Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative hearings (1)
- CeRI (1)
- Citizen participation in government (1)
- Civic engagement (1)
- Cornell eRulemaking Initiative (1)
-
- E-government (1)
- E-rulemaking (1)
- EGovernment (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Federal administrative agencies (1)
- Frank Michelman (1)
- Kelo v. City of New London (1)
- Moral warrant (1)
- Online policy deliberation (1)
- Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of Detroit (1)
- Public interest groups (1)
- Public participation (1)
- RegulationRoom.org (1)
- Rulemaking (1)
- SmartParticipation.com (1)
- Social networking (1)
- Takings law (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Comment Data From Ceri, 4-3-2017, Cornell Erulemaking Initiative
Comment Data From Ceri, 4-3-2017, Cornell Erulemaking Initiative
Cornell e-Rulemaking Initiative Publications
This file contains comment data from ten live policy discussions held on RegulationRoom.org and SmartParticipation.com from May 2010 to November 2016. A cross-disciplinary group of Cornell researchers, the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative (CeRI), created the experimental platforms for public participation in policymaking processes. CeRI used selected live federal agency rulemakings and other policy discussions to discover how the design and process of online engagement can support public discussion that is informed, inclusive and insightful.
Rulemaking 2.0: Understanding And Getting Better Public Participation, Cynthia R. Farina, Mary J. Newhart
Rulemaking 2.0: Understanding And Getting Better Public Participation, Cynthia R. Farina, Mary J. Newhart
Cornell e-Rulemaking Initiative Publications
More than a decade after the launch of Regulations.gov, the government-wide federal online rulemaking portal, and nearly four years since the Obama Administration directed agencies to use “innovative tools and practices that create new and easier methods for public engagement,” there are still more questions than answers about what value social media and other Web 2 .0 technologies can bring to rulemaking–and about how agencies can realize that value.
This report, commissioned by the IBM Center for the Business of Government, begins to provide those answers. Drawing on insights from a number of disciplines and on three years of actual …
Kelo's Moral Failure, Laura S. Underkuffler
Kelo's Moral Failure, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Why, Where And How Of Broadened Public Participation In The Administrative Process, Roger C. Cramton
The Why, Where And How Of Broadened Public Participation In The Administrative Process, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The actions of federal administrative agencies – rules, orders, licenses, loans, grants, contracts, and the like – have enormous effects on individuals and groups. Yet affected persons and groups are not always accorded the opportunity to participate in decision making procedures that affect them. Mr. Cramton argues that broadened public participation will improve administrative decisions and give them greater legitimacy and acceptance. After discussing the types of proceedings in which public participation is desirable and the limitations that should be placed upon it, Mr. Cramton evaluates various proposals for assuring the desired degree of public participation.