Law Commons^™

Appeal No. 0670: Kermit Harris & Pearl Hendricks V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-73

The Engineering Aspects Of The Implied Covenant To Protect Against Drainage, Henry C. Coutret

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0663: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 99-20

Appeal No. 0661: Halwell Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 99-24

Appeal No. 0589: Estate Of M. Morrison V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-161

Appeal No. 0668: Dr. James Papitran V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-69

Appeal No. 0667: Century Well Service V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-64

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 47, Fall Issue, 1999, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0669: Dr. James Papritan V. Division Of Oil & Gas & Belden & Blake, Et Al.,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 99-70

Appeal No. 0671: Art & Carol Crann V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-103

Appeal No. 0662: William C. Barteles, Et Al V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-11 (Energy Resources of America)

Appeal No. 0665: Pennzoil Exploration & Production V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 99-38

Appeal No. 0664: Alsid Oil & Gas Development Co., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 99-39

Appeal No. 0656: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 98-81

Appeal No. 0655: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 98-80

Appeal No. 0659: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 98-103

Appeal No. 0660: Mc Oil Producers V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 98-122

Appeal No. 0657: Estate Of Nova A. Christman V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 98-97

Appeal No. 0658: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 98-102

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 46, Spring Issue, 1999, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: An Overview Of New Cases, Legislation & Regulations Affecting The Oil & Gas Industry-Natural Resources Industries, Thomas A. Daily

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Calculating Royalty: "Costs" Subsequent To Production, Owen L. Anderson

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0650: Alsid Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 98-41

Determining The Legal Ramifications Of Express Oil And Gas Lease Provisions: Do The Rules Of Document Interpretation Provide Predictability?, Laura H. Burney

Faculty CLE

The oil and gas lease has served as the basic contract for the petroleum industry since 1853. Throughout the decades, the “typical” oil and gas lease clauses have been developed and revised in response to judicial decisions. To provide an update on the evolution of today’s oil and gas lease, it is necessary to review selected court decisions construing lease clauses.

Theoretically, the rules of document interpretation should provide a reliable guide when courts are asked to determine the legal ramifications of express lease provisions. However, review of relevant cases, including recent decisions and older cases providing unique lessons about …

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 45, Winter Issue, 1999, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Farmout Agreements And Related Issues, John S. Lowe

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

No abstract provided.

Intermediate Sanctions: Controlling The Tax-Exempt Organization Manager, Alex Ritchie

Faculty Scholarship

On August 4, 1988, the Department of the Treasury issued proposed intermediate sanctions regulations that allow the Internal Revenue Service to impose significant excise taxes on executives of tax-exempt organizations who receive compensation in excess of reasonable compensation or in excess of amounts that would ordinarily be paid for like services by like enterprises. Exempt organization theory holds that government provides a tax exemption to further social goals, but those goals are frustrated when management has conflicting incentives. In a for-profit entity, management and firm owners have conflicting goals when control is separated from ownership, but in a tax-exempt entity, …