Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (4)
- Arbitration (2)
- Choice of court (2)
- Forum selection (2)
- Private international law (2)
-
- Procedure (2)
- Recognition and enforcement of judgments (2)
- The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (2)
- Transnational contracts (2)
- Antitrust Law (1)
- Bias (1)
- Civil Law and Procedure (1)
- Civil Litigation (1)
- Civil justice system (1)
- Contract damages (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Empirical research (1)
- Empty rights (1)
- Expansion of mandatory claims reporting (1)
- Expectation (1)
- Forum non conveniens (1)
- Incomplete knowledge (1)
- Insurance law (1)
- Intellectual property law (1)
- International Law (1)
- International Litigation (1)
- International cooperation (1)
- International judicial cooperation (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jury instructions (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Whose Regulatory Interests? Outsourcing The Treaty Function, Stephen B. Burbank
Whose Regulatory Interests? Outsourcing The Treaty Function, Stephen B. Burbank
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
In this article I describe the status quo in the area of foreign judgment recognition, with attention to the tension between domestic interests and international cooperation. Precisely because the future of the status quo is in doubt, I then consider current proposals for change, particularly the effort to implement the Hague Choice of Court Convention in the United States. Prominent among the normative questions raised by my account is whose interests, in addition to the litigants’ interests, are at stake – those of the United States, those of the several states, or those of interest groups waving a federal or …
The Relational Contingency Of Rights, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
The Relational Contingency Of Rights, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
In this Article, we demonstrate, contrary to conventional wisdom, that all rights are relationally contingent. Our main thesis is that rights afford their holders meaningful protection only against challengers who face higher litigation costs than the rightholder. Contrariwise, challengers who can litigate more cheaply than a rightholder can force the rightholder to forfeit the right and thereby render the right ineffective. Consequently, in the real world, rights avail only against certain challengers but not others. This result is robust and pervasive. Furthermore, it obtains irrespectively of how rights and other legal entitlements are defined by the legislator or construed by …
Locking The Doors To Discovery? Assessing The Effects Of Twombly And Iqbal On Access To Discovery, Jonah B. Gelbach
Locking The Doors To Discovery? Assessing The Effects Of Twombly And Iqbal On Access To Discovery, Jonah B. Gelbach
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
Many observers believe the Supreme Court’s Twombly and Iqbal opinions have curtailed access to civil justice. But previous empirical studies looking only at Rule 12(b)(6) grant rates have failed to capture the full effect of these cases because they have not accounted for party selection—changes in party behavior that can be expected following changes in pleading standards. In this Note, I show how party selection can be expected to undermine the empirical usefulness of simple grant-rate comparisons. I then use a conceptual model of party behavior that allows me to derive an adjusted measure of Twombly/Iqbal’s impact and show …
Instructing Juries On Noneconomic Contract Damages, David A. Hoffman, Alexander Radus
Instructing Juries On Noneconomic Contract Damages, David A. Hoffman, Alexander Radus
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
Gathering pattern contract jury instructions from every State, we examine jurisdictions' treatment of noneconomic damages. While the conventional account holds that there is a uniform preference against awards of noneconomic damages, we find four different approaches in pattern instructions, with only one state explicitly prohibiting juries from considering noneconomic losses. Lay juries have considerably more freedom to award the promisee's noneconomic damages than the hornbooks would have us believe. We substantiate this claim with an online survey experiment asking respondents about a common contract case, and instructing them using the differing pattern forms. We found that subjects routinely awarded more …
A Tea Party At The Hague?, Stephen B. Burbank
A Tea Party At The Hague?, Stephen B. Burbank
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
In this article, I consider the prospects for and impediments to judicial cooperation with the United States. I do so by describing a personal journey that began more than twenty years ago when I first taught and wrote about international civil litigation. An important part of my journey has involved studying the role that the United States has played, and can usefully play, in fostering judicial cooperation, including through judgment recognition and enforcement. The journey continues but, today, finds me a weary traveler, more worried than ever about the politics and practice of international procedural lawmaking in the United States. …
International Civil Litigation In U.S. Courts: Becoming A Paper Tiger?, Stephen B. Burbank
International Civil Litigation In U.S. Courts: Becoming A Paper Tiger?, Stephen B. Burbank
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
No abstract provided.
Transparency Through Insurance: Mandates Dominate Discretion, Tom Baker
Transparency Through Insurance: Mandates Dominate Discretion, Tom Baker
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
This chapter describes how liability insurance has contributed to the transparency of the civil justice system. The chapter makes three main points. First, much of what we know about the empirics of the civil justice system comes from access to liability insurance data and personnel. Second, as long as access to liability insurance data and personnel depends on the discretion of liability insurance organizations, this knowledge will be incomplete and, most likely, biased in favor of the public policy agenda of the organizations providing discretionary access to the data. Third, although mandatory disclosure of liability insurance data would improve transparency, …