Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 2014 AALL Annual Meeting (1)
- American Association of Law Libraries (1)
- Authentication (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Class certification (1)
-
- Colorado (1)
- Counties (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- FRCP (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- MRP (1)
- Mississippi College Law Library Legislative History Project (1)
- Online version (1)
- Prejudice (1)
- Primary law (1)
- Public Access to Government Information (PAGI) Award (1)
- Race (1)
- Robert L. Oakley Advocacy Award (1)
- Rule 23 (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Sarah (Sally) G. Holterhoff (1)
- Section 2 (1)
- Section 5 (1)
- States (1)
- Stereotypes (1)
- Summary judgment (1)
- Trans-substantivity (1)
- UELMA (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Congratulations To The 2014 Recipients Of The Oakley Advocacy And Pagi Awards!, Susan Nevelow Mart
Congratulations To The 2014 Recipients Of The Oakley Advocacy And Pagi Awards!, Susan Nevelow Mart
Publications
No abstract provided.
A Diamond In The Rough: Trans-Substantivity Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure And Its Detrimental Impact On Civil Rights, Suzette Malveaux
A Diamond In The Rough: Trans-Substantivity Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure And Its Detrimental Impact On Civil Rights, Suzette Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.
Uelma - Another First For Colorado, Susan Nevelow Mart
Uelma - Another First For Colorado, Susan Nevelow Mart
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Geography Of Racial Stereotyping: Evidence And Implications For Vra ‘Preclearance’ After Shelby County, Christopher S. Elmendorf, Douglas M. Spencer
The Geography Of Racial Stereotyping: Evidence And Implications For Vra ‘Preclearance’ After Shelby County, Christopher S. Elmendorf, Douglas M. Spencer
Publications
The Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) effectively enjoined the preclearance regime of the Voting Rights Act. The Court deemed the coverage formula, which determines the jurisdictions subject to preclearance, insufficiently grounded in current conditions. This Article proposes a new, legally defensible approach to coverage based on between-state differences in the proportion of voting age citizens who subscribe to negative stereotypes about racial minorities and who vote accordingly. The new coverage formula could also account for racially polarized voting and minority population size, but, for constitutional reasons, subjective discrimination by voters is the essential criterion. We demonstrate that …