Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ADA (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Antidiscrimination statutes (1)
- Arbitration (1)
-
- Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Disability discrimination law (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Farrel v. U.S. International Trade Commission (1)
- GATT obligations (1)
- HIV infection (1)
- International trade law (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Medical treatment decisions (1)
- New York Convention (1)
- Pediatric HIV (1)
- Private dispute settlements (1)
- Sovereign international trade obligations (1)
- U.S. Federal Arbitration Act (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Of Diagnoses And Discrimination: Discriminatory Nontreatment Of Infants With Hiv Infection, Mary Crossley
Of Diagnoses And Discrimination: Discriminatory Nontreatment Of Infants With Hiv Infection, Mary Crossley
Articles
Evidence of physician attitudes favoring the withholding of needed medical treatment from infants infected with HIV compels a reassessment of the applicability and adequacy of existing law in dealing with selective nontreatment. Although we can hope to have learned some lessons from the Baby Doe controversy of the mid-1980s, whether the legislation emerging from that controversy, the Child Abuse Amendments of 1984, has ever adequately dealt with the problem of nontreatment remains far from clear. Today, the medical and social characteristics of most infants infected with HIV introduce new variables into our assessment of that legislation. At stake are the …
International Trade Law And The Arbitration Of Administrative Law Matters: Farrel V. U.S. International Trade Commission, Ronald A. Brand
International Trade Law And The Arbitration Of Administrative Law Matters: Farrel V. U.S. International Trade Commission, Ronald A. Brand
Articles
With support from the executive branch, Congress, and the courts, arbitration has become an increasingly popular method of international dispute resolution. While agreements to arbitrate traditionally were frowned upon, particularly when the dispute involved certain “public law” or “statutory” matters, the situation has changed dramatically in the past few decades. United States courts now routinely order arbitration of disputes implicating important policy issues in securities, antitrust, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”), and employment law matters. By the end of the 1980’s, the presence of a public or “statutory” issue seemed no longer to be a distinguishing factor; arbitration, when …