Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- American Law (1)
- And Comparative Jewish Law (1)
- Chief Justice Warren (1)
- Comparative study (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
-
- Freud (1)
- International law (1)
- International legal process (1)
- International relations (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal realism (1)
- Legal scholarship (1)
- Levine (1)
- Mishneh Torah (1)
- Norms (1)
- Rabbi Lamm (1)
- Rambam (1)
- Rules (1)
- Samuel Levine (1)
- Self-incrimination (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- The Fifth Amendment (1)
- U.S. foreign relations (1)
- United States (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rabbi Lamm, The Fifth Amendment, And Comparative Jewish Law, Samuel J. Levine
Rabbi Lamm, The Fifth Amendment, And Comparative Jewish Law, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
Rabbi Norman Lamm’s 1956 article, “The Fifth Amendment and Its Equivalent in the Halakha,” provides important lessons for scholarship in both Jewish and American law. Sixty-five years after it was published, the article remains, in many ways, a model for interdisciplinary and comparative study of Jewish law, drawing upon sources in the Jewish legal tradition, American legal history, and modern psychology. In so doing, the article proves faithful to each discipline on its own terms, producing insights that illuminate all three disciplines while respecting the internal logic within each one. In addition to many other distinctions, since its initial publication, …
Are We (Americans) All International Realists Now?, Harlan G. Cohen
Are We (Americans) All International Realists Now?, Harlan G. Cohen
Scholarly Works
Is American international law distinctly legal realist? The claim is often made, but underexplored. What would it mean for American international law scholarship and practice to be legal realist in its orientation? Where would such an orientation come from, and what do those origin stories mean for current international law work? Are there common realist-inspired approaches within the varied schools of American international law scholarship? Does wielding those approaches produce distinctly American views on international law doctrine, its operation, or its function? And if American international law scholarship and practice is, in these ways, somewhat distinct, what does it mean …