Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Critical theory (2)
- Abolition democracy (1)
- Belief (1)
- Criminal punishment (1)
- Critical debate (1)
-
- Critical praxis (1)
- Democracy (1)
- Distributive justice (1)
- Equality (1)
- Focault Studies (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Governance (1)
- Government (1)
- Intention (1)
- Justice (1)
- Law (1)
- Law and emotions (1)
- Meritocracy (1)
- Moral interest (1)
- Moral philosophy (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Political revolution (1)
- Politics (1)
- Public good (1)
- Racialized mass incarceration (1)
- Radical experimentation (1)
- Republic (1)
- Social movement (1)
- Thought crime doctrine (1)
- Transformative justice (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
What Is "United" About The United States?, Gary S. Lawson
What Is "United" About The United States?, Gary S. Lawson
Faculty Scholarship
Jack Balkin’s The Cycles of Constitutional Time aims, among other things, to preserve and promote what Jack regards as “democracy and republicanism,” understood as “a joint enterprise by citizens and their representatives to pursue and promote the public good.” My question is whether and how this normative project is possible in a world full of perceptions of social, political, and moral phenomena akin to the white dress/blue dress internet controversy of 2015. Even if Madison had the better of Montesquieu in 1788 (and that is questionable), the United States has grown dramatically since the founding era, in a patchwork, and …
Precedent As Rational Persuasion, Brian N. Larson
Precedent As Rational Persuasion, Brian N. Larson
Faculty Scholarship
The ways that judges and lawyers make and justify their arguments and decisions have profound impacts on our lives. Understanding those practices in light of theories of reasoning and argumentation is thus critical for understanding law and the society it shapes. An inquiry that explores the very foundations of all legal reasoning leads to a broad, important question: How do lawyers and judges use cited cases in their legal arguments? It turns out there is practically no empirical research to suggest the answer. As the first step in a comprehensive empirical effort to answer this question, this article performs a …
Think Again: The Thought Crime Doctrine And The Limits Of Criminal Law, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Think Again: The Thought Crime Doctrine And The Limits Of Criminal Law, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Faculty Scholarship
According to the thought crime doctrine, neither beliefs nor intentions may be subject to criminal punishment. The doctrine is widely endorsed, but puzzling in its scope. Beliefs have a free speech credential: they play a straightforward role in the sincere exchange of ideas. Moreover, they are harmless, in the specific sense that they do not aim at action and so not at lawbreaking. But intentions are otherwise. They do not necessarily further the exchange of ideas and they may aim at wrongful, illegal conduct.
So why should the thought crime doctrine categorically protect them in addition to beliefs? Why not …
“Let Those Who Have An Experience Of Prison Speak”: The Critique & Praxis Of The Prisons Information Group (1970-1980), Bernard E. Harcourt
“Let Those Who Have An Experience Of Prison Speak”: The Critique & Praxis Of The Prisons Information Group (1970-1980), Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
As the May ’68 revolution reached a boiling point, a remarkable assemblage of philosophers, writers, and incarcerated persons, doctors, nurses, social workers, and sociologists, activists and organizers, and militants in France turned their attention to the problem of the prison. At a time when prisons were mostly hidden from view, practically impenetrable in France to outsiders, at a time long before we recognized mass incarceration in countries like the United States, the Prisons Information Group (the Groupe d’information sur les prisons or the “GIP”) coalesced to spotlight the travesty of justice that is the prison – one that continues unabated …
The Critique And Praxis Of Rights, Bernard E. Harcourt
The Critique And Praxis Of Rights, Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
The critique of rights has played a crowning role in critical philosophy. From Hegel to Marx, to Foucault and beyond – Duncan Kennedy, Christoph Menke, the contributors to this Symposium – the critique of rights has always represented an essential and inescapable step in the critique of modern Western society. The reason is plain: conceptions of natural rights, human rights, and civil rights have been central to the founding of modern political thought (from Hobbes, Locke, and Wollstonecraft forward), to the birth and flourishing of legal and political liberalism (in Rawls and Habermas), to the establishment of regimes of civil …
Can Sandel Dethrone Meritocracy?, Robert L. Tsai
Can Sandel Dethrone Meritocracy?, Robert L. Tsai
Faculty Scholarship
This is an invited review essay of Michael Sandel, The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good? (FSG 2020), for the inaugural issue of The American Journal of Law and Inequality (R. Kennedy, M. Minow, C. Sunstein, eds.). Sandel makes three principal arguments: (1) meritocracy is deeply flawed because it worsens inequality and fills meritocracy's winners with hubris and losers with shame; (2) universities should introduce a lottery into the admissions process; and (3) this reform, coupled with increased emphasis on the dignity of labor, will repair the politics of resentment that now roil our country.
I respond …