Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Sexual harassment (2)
- Affirmative defense (1)
- Agency (1)
- Consent (1)
- Employment law (1)
-
- Hostile work environment (1)
- Negligence. (1)
- One-time incident (1)
- Prompt corrective action (1)
- Propensity (1)
- Reasonable care to prevent (1)
- Recidivist harasser (1)
- Repeat harasser (1)
- Sexual assault (1)
- Supervisor (1)
- Supervisory harassment (1)
- Tangible employment action (1)
- Violent rape (1)
- Women (1)
- Workplace (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Monetizing Diaspora: Liquid Sovereigns, Fertile Workers, And The Interest-Convergence Around Remittance, Jose M. Gabilondo
Monetizing Diaspora: Liquid Sovereigns, Fertile Workers, And The Interest-Convergence Around Remittance, Jose M. Gabilondo
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Consenting Adults? Why Women Who Submit To Supervisory Sexual Harassment Are Faring Better In Court Than Those Who Say No…And Why They Shouldn’T, Kerri Lynn Stone
Consenting Adults? Why Women Who Submit To Supervisory Sexual Harassment Are Faring Better In Court Than Those Who Say No…And Why They Shouldn’T, Kerri Lynn Stone
Faculty Publications
Today, as a sexual harassment plaintiff who failed to report harassment before bringing suit, you likely will fare better under the law if you submitted to your harasser and engaged in relations with him, than you would if you had passively resisted until you were driven out of your employment. This Article examines the law’s illogical preference for plaintiffs who acquiesced to the propositions of their supervisors over those who resisted harassment but nonetheless failed to report it. It explores the roots of such a preference in society, as well as its consequences. Ultimately, this Article asks critical questions that …
License To Harass: Holding Defendants Accountable For Retaining Recidivist Harassers, Kerri Lynn Stone
License To Harass: Holding Defendants Accountable For Retaining Recidivist Harassers, Kerri Lynn Stone
Faculty Publications
Harassment victims who suffer a "tangible employment action," which the Supreme Court defines as a "significant change in employment status such as hiring, firing, failure to promote, reassignment, or a decision causing a significant change in benefits," enjoy unfettered recourse when they sue their employers. However, victims who do not endure what a court will deem a "tangible employment action" will have their prima facie case of harassment then rendered vulnerable to the interposition of an affirmative defense by a defendant-employer, who will escape liability if it can show "(a) that the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct …