Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judges (2)
- Civil rights (1)
- Complaints (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Corporate capitalism (1)
-
- Empirical (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Gerald Berk (1)
- Judicial Decision Making (1)
- Judicial Disqualification (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Law & psychology (1)
- Law & society (1)
- Law and politics (1)
- Louis Brandeis (1)
- Notice pleading (1)
- Plausibility pleading (1)
- Pleading (1)
- Regulated competition (1)
- Regulations (1)
- Regulatory state (1)
- Rule 8 (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Twombly (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Activism And The Interpretation Of The Voting Rights Act, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Judicial Activism And The Interpretation Of The Voting Rights Act, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Articles by Maurer Faculty
From the moment the U.S. Supreme Court first confronted the difficult constitutional questions at the heart of the Voting Rights Act, its posture has been one of deference. This posture has continued to this day. In contrast, the Court has interpreted the language of the Act dynamically, often in total disregard to the text of the law or the intent of Congress. But as this Article explains, the Roberts Court appears poised to unsettle this longstanding narrative. The Act is in serious constitutional danger. One way to explain this move on the part of the Court is by invoking the …
Why Judicial Disqualification Matters. Again., Charles G. Geyh
Why Judicial Disqualification Matters. Again., Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Book Review. Louis D. Brandeis And The Making Of Regulated Competition, 1900-1932 By Gerald Berk, Ajay K. Mehrotra
Book Review. Louis D. Brandeis And The Making Of Regulated Competition, 1900-1932 By Gerald Berk, Ajay K. Mehrotra
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009) from a social psychological perspective, and empirically studies Iqbal’s effect on claims of race discrimination.
In Twombly and then Iqbal, the Court recast Rule 8 from a notice-based rule into a plausibility standard. Under Iqbal, federal judges must evaluate whether each complaint contains sufficient factual matter “to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” When doing so, Iqbal requires judges to draw on their “judicial experience and common sense.” Courts apply Iqbal at the pleading stage, before evidence has been …