Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Court Documents (9)
- Land Claims (9)
- Sandia Mountain (9)
- Sandia Pueblo (9)
- Groundwater (3)
-
- Priority (3)
- Reservation (3)
- Resolution (3)
- Settlement (3)
- Surface (3)
- Transfer (3)
- US (3)
- Waiver (3)
- "Bernalillo County (2)
- AFY (2)
- Acre-feet per year (2)
- Adjudication (2)
- Authorize (2)
- Contract (2)
- Dispute (2)
- Diversion (2)
- Effective (2)
- Federal (2)
- Fish (2)
- Fund (2)
- Immunity (2)
- Impound (2)
- Instream (2)
- Interior (2)
- Lease (2)
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Confederated Tribes Of The Warm Springs Reservation Water Rights Settlement Agreement, Confederated Tribes Of The Warm Springs Reservation Et Al
Confederated Tribes Of The Warm Springs Reservation Water Rights Settlement Agreement, Confederated Tribes Of The Warm Springs Reservation Et Al
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
Reservation, and long-term cooperative management of the waters. The Tribes shall not convert any existing non-consumptive use to a consumptive use. The Agreement designates the amounts of instream flows and diverted water for the Tribes. The Tribes have the first priority for their Tribal Reserved Water Right; however, existing State law water rights will not be curtailed in favor of the Tribal Reserved water right. The water right may be obtained from surface or groundwater. A part of the Tribal Reserved Water Right may be used off reservation, subject to federal, state and Tribal Law. While used on Reservation the …
Order Granting Motion For Extension, Harold H. Greene
Order Granting Motion For Extension, Harold H. Greene
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Plaintiff's Reply To Intervenor-Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Intervenor-Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Plaintiff's Response To Bernalillo County's Proposed Uncontroverted Facts, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Plaintiff's Response To Bernalillo County's Proposed Uncontroverted Facts, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Bernalillo's County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Bernalillo's County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
Defendant-Intervenor Bernalillo County, New Mexico adopts this cross-motion in support of the Federal Defendants' Cross-motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support (filed June 27, 1997). As set out in the Federal Defendants Memorandum in Support, the administrative record demonstrates that Secretary Hodel's decision not to grant the Pueblo's claim was fully supported by the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious, and that Secretary Babbitt's inaction on the Pueblo's claim does not constitute reviewable final agency action and/or was not arbitrary and capricious.
Intervenor-Defendant Bernalillo County's Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment And In Support Of County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Intervenor-Defendant Bernalillo County's Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment And In Support Of County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
Intervenor-defendant Bernalillo County, New Mexico states its opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Pueblo of Sandia (filed June 26, 1996) and joins in with and adopts the United States' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (filed June 27, 1997). Further, Defendant Bernalillo County moves the Court to grant it summary judgment on the same grounds on which it opposes Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion.
Plaintiff's Reply To Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Plaintiff's Reply To Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Federal Defendants' Statement Of Genuine Issues In Response To Plaintiff's Statement Of Undisputed Facts, Andrew M. Eschen
Federal Defendants' Statement Of Genuine Issues In Response To Plaintiff's Statement Of Undisputed Facts, Andrew M. Eschen
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
San Carlos Apache Tribe Amendments To Act Of 1992, 1997 Amendment To The San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement, 105th Congress
San Carlos Apache Tribe Amendments To Act Of 1992, 1997 Amendment To The San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement, 105th Congress
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
Federal Legislation: Department of the Interior, General Provisions - San Carlos Apache Tribe Amendments to Act of 1992, Chapter 5 of Emergency Supplemental Appropriations For Recovery From Natural Disasters, And For Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those In Bosnia, PL 105-18, 111 Stat. 158, 181-187 (Jun. 12, 1997). Parties: US & San Carlos Apache Tribe. 1992 Settlement Act amended 3711 to move deadline to Mar. 31, 1999 & effect on deadline of submission of a proposed Settlement Agreement to Gila Adjudication court; and addition of certain parties & definitions to the 1992 Settlement Agreement. The provisions address the transfer of the …
Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Compact, Mt, Chippewa-Cree Tribe
Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Compact, Mt, Chippewa-Cree Tribe
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
Settlement - State Legislation: There is no stand alone settlement agreement: Water Rights Compact - MT, Chippewa-Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy's Reservation & US of 1997 (MCA 85-20-601) This Compact arose out of a MT state court water rights adjudication. It serves both as settlement agreement and state legislation. The Compact sets forth the Tribe’s rights and involve Stoneman Reservoir, East Fork Reservoir, Gravel Coulee, Lower Big Sandy Creek, Ancestral Missouri River Channel Aquifer, Box Elder Creek, Beaver Creek, Camp Creek, Duck Creek, Gorman Creek, Lake Elwell, Bonneau Reservoir, Brown’s Reservoir, and new impoundments. It identifies rights in groundwater and …
Order Granting Motion To Intervene, Harold H. Greene
Order Granting Motion To Intervene, Harold H. Greene
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Stipulation For Enlargement Of Time To Answer Complaint, Andrew M. Eschen
Stipulation For Enlargement Of Time To Answer Complaint, Andrew M. Eschen
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments, Kevin Washburn
Recent Developments, Kevin Washburn
Faculty Scholarship
Summary of cases in the areas of environmental law, taxation of natural resources, and water rights cases involving Native American tribes.