Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adequacy (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Campus speech codes (1)
- Children (1)
- Disabilities (1)
-
- Discriminatory speech (1)
- Doe v. University of Michigan (1)
- Education for All Handicapped Children Act (1)
- Educational policy (1)
- Elementary schools (1)
- Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District RE-1 (1)
- Equality (1)
- Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools (1)
- No Child Left Behind Act (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Public schools (1)
- Race-based harassment (1)
- Racial hate speech (1)
- Schools (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Educational Equality For Children With Disabilities: The 2016 Term Cases, Samuel R. Bagenstos
Educational Equality For Children With Disabilities: The 2016 Term Cases, Samuel R. Bagenstos
Book Chapters
One of the most longstanding debates in educational policy pits the goal of equality against the goal of adequacy: Should we aim to guarantee that all children receive an equal education? Or simply that they all receive an adequate education? The debate is vexing in part because there are many ways to specify “equality” and “adequacy.” Are we talking about equality of inputs (which inputs?), equality of opportunity (to achieve what?), or equality of results (which results?)? Douglas Rae and his colleagues famously argued that there are no fewer than 108 structurally distinct conceptions of equality. And how do we …
Doe V. University Of Michigan: Free Speech On Campus 25 Years Later, Leonard M. Niehoff
Doe V. University Of Michigan: Free Speech On Campus 25 Years Later, Leonard M. Niehoff
Articles
I would like to use as the launching pad for my remarks today the 1989 federal district court decision in Doe v. University of Michigan. Doe is the seminal case on campus speech codes and it just recently passed its twenty-fifth anniversary. I thought this symposium would be a good occasion to look back, see where we were, assess where we are, and ask whether we have made any progress. Spoiler alert: the news is not good.