Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- UC Law SF (4)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
-
- Wayne State University (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of South Carolina (1)
- Keyword
-
- Death penalty (4)
- Capital punishment (3)
- Eighth Amendment (2)
- Fifth amendment (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
-
- Police (2)
- Search and seizure (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- After-discovered evidence (1)
- Aggravating United States v. McCormick (1)
- Aggravating factors (1)
- Arizona State Law Journal (1)
- Berkemer (1)
- Capital (1)
- Capital case (1)
- Carella (1)
- Character impeachment evidence (1)
- Civil forfeiture (1)
- Clear and convincing evidence (1)
- Colonial criminal procedure (1)
- Colorado Constitution (1)
- Commission par omission (1)
- Community policing (1)
- Conclusive mandatory presumptions (1)
- Consent exception (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional theory (1)
- Credibility (1)
- Crime and disorder (1)
- Criminal cases (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (16)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- California Agencies (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Publications (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Ambiguity Of Accountability: Deaths In Custody, And The Regulation Of Police Power, Mark Findlay
The Ambiguity Of Accountability: Deaths In Custody, And The Regulation Of Police Power, Mark Findlay
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Policing is power. Police authority relies on transactions or relationships of power and influence. The nature of that authority depends on, and takes its form from specific environments of opportunity. Opportunity is, in turn, designated by the aspirations for such relationships, and structures and processes at work towards their regulation. Police authority can be confirmed either legitimately or illegitimately, depending on its context. Essential to the operation of police authority are the "boundaries of permission" which designate the dominion of police power. A principal regulator of police authority, and therefore an important mechanism whereby boundaries of permission are determined, is …
Testing Penry And Its Progeny , Deborah W. Denno
Testing Penry And Its Progeny , Deborah W. Denno
Faculty Scholarship
In Penry v. Lynaugh, the United States Supreme Court held that the Texas death penalty statute was applied unconstitutionally because the trial court gave no instructions allowing the jury to “consider and give effect to” the defendant's mitigating evidence of organic brain damage, moderate retardation, and disadvantaged background. The Court considered these mitigating factors relevant because of society's steadfast belief in the lesser culpability of defendants whose criminal acts are due to a disadvantaged background, or to emotional and mental disorders. The jury must have full consideration of such evidence in order to give its “reasoned moral response” to the …
Prosecutors And Domestic Violence: Local Leadership Makes A Difference, Janet E. Findlater, Dawn Van Hoek
Prosecutors And Domestic Violence: Local Leadership Makes A Difference, Janet E. Findlater, Dawn Van Hoek
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy, The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, And The Subsequent-Prosecution Dilemma, Elizabeth T. Lear
Double Jeopardy, The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, And The Subsequent-Prosecution Dilemma, Elizabeth T. Lear
UF Law Faculty Publications
The choice to embrace a real-offense regime probably constitutes the single most controversial decision made by the Federal Sentencing Commission in drafting the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"). Real-offense sentencing bases punishment on a defendant's actual conduct as opposed to the offense of conviction. The Guidelines sweep a variety of factors into the sentencing inquiry, including criminal offenses for which no conviction has been obtained. Under the Guidelines, therefore, prosecutorial charging decisions and even verdicts of acquittal after jury trial may have little impact at sentencing.
Long before the adoption of the Guidelines, courts bent on rationalizing the real-offense regime devised …
A Town Hall Meeting On Three Strikes And You're Out, The Hon. William J. Cahill, Moderator
A Town Hall Meeting On Three Strikes And You're Out, The Hon. William J. Cahill, Moderator
California Agencies
A community discussion of the new law, the initiative, alternatives to prison .
Assuming Facts Not In Evidence: A Response To Russell M. Coombs, Reforming New Jersey Evidence Law On Fresh Complaint Of Rape, Sherry F. Colb
Assuming Facts Not In Evidence: A Response To Russell M. Coombs, Reforming New Jersey Evidence Law On Fresh Complaint Of Rape, Sherry F. Colb
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Law, Culture, And Harassment, Anita Bernstein
Law, Culture, And Harassment, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Guilty Pleas, Meredith Kolsky Lewis
A World Without Privacy: Why Property Does Not Define The Limits Of The Right Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures, Sherry F. Colb
A World Without Privacy: Why Property Does Not Define The Limits Of The Right Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures, Sherry F. Colb
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Overbroad Civil Forfeiture Statutes Are Unconstitutionally Vague, Deborah Duseau, David Schoenbrod
Overbroad Civil Forfeiture Statutes Are Unconstitutionally Vague, Deborah Duseau, David Schoenbrod
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Connecticut V. Doehr And Procedural Due Process Requirements For Prejudgment Remedies: The Sniadach Tetrad Revisited, Linda Beale
Connecticut V. Doehr And Procedural Due Process Requirements For Prejudgment Remedies: The Sniadach Tetrad Revisited, Linda Beale
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
An Introduction To Post-Conviction Remedies, Practice And Procedure In South Carolina, John H. Blume
An Introduction To Post-Conviction Remedies, Practice And Procedure In South Carolina, John H. Blume
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The purpose of this article is to discuss various aspects of an inmate's available post-conviction remedies in South Carolina. Very little has been written about this topic, perhaps because post-conviction is considered by many to be the "redheaded stepchild of the legal system." Despite the importance of post-conviction remedies as a safeguard against unjust, unconstitutional, and erroneous confinements, this systemic devaluing of the importance of the post-conviction process is widespread. Convicted persons in South Carolina raising post-conviction challenges rely almost exclusively on appointed counsel, most of whom have little experience in this area of the law. Counsels' enthusiasm for the …
Police Interrogation: The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, The Right To Counsel, And The Incomplete Metamorphosis Of Justice White, 48 U. Miami L. Rev. 511 (1994), Ralph Ruebner
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Of Myths And Mapp: A Response To Professor Magee, Sheri Johnson
Of Myths And Mapp: A Response To Professor Magee, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Sentencing: Capital Punishment, Jodi L. Short, Mark D. Spoto
Sentencing: Capital Punishment, Jodi L. Short, Mark D. Spoto
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Theories Of Federal Habeas Corpus, Evan Tsen Lee
The Theories Of Federal Habeas Corpus, Evan Tsen Lee
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
"Other Crimes" Evidence In Sex Offense Cases, Roger C. Park, David P. Bryden
"Other Crimes" Evidence In Sex Offense Cases, Roger C. Park, David P. Bryden
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Spelling Guilt Out Of A Record? Harmless Error Review Of Conclusive Mandatory Presumptions And Elemental Misdescriptions, John M. Greabe
Spelling Guilt Out Of A Record? Harmless Error Review Of Conclusive Mandatory Presumptions And Elemental Misdescriptions, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
Part I of this Article summarizes the history of harmless-error review. Part II explains more fully the constitutional infirmities generated by conclusive mandatory presumptions and elemental misdescriptions, and demonstrates that the unique nature of these infirmities complicates the question of how courts should review them for harmlessness. It also examines the Supreme Court's attempts to answer the questions of whether, and how, conclusive mandatory presumptions and elemental misdescriptions should be reviewed for harmlessness. In so doing, it focuses particularly on how these attempts have been undermined by the Court's failure to take account of the structural rights undermined by these …
Depravity Thrice Removed: Using The 'Heinous, Cruel, Or Depraved' Factor To Aggravate Convictions Of Nontriggermen Accomplices In Capital Cases, Richard W. Garnett
Depravity Thrice Removed: Using The 'Heinous, Cruel, Or Depraved' Factor To Aggravate Convictions Of Nontriggermen Accomplices In Capital Cases, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
In Tison v. Arizona, the Tison brothers' appeal from their death sentences, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a nontriggerman convicted of first-degree felony murder could constitutionally be executed if he was a major participant in the crime and if he exhibited a reckless disregard for human life. This decision blurred the bright-line rule announced just five years earlier in Enmund v. Florida, which limited the death penalty to defendants who kill, attempt to kill, or at least intend to kill. Tison thus dramatically increased the exposure of nontriggermen to capital punishment, undercutting the death penalty's limited purpose of identifying …
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
How Reasonable Is The Reasonable Man?: Police And Excessive Force, Geoffrey P. Alpert, William C. Smith
How Reasonable Is The Reasonable Man?: Police And Excessive Force, Geoffrey P. Alpert, William C. Smith
Faculty Publications
The authority of the police to use force represents one of the most misunderstood powers granted to representatives of government. Police officers are authorized to use both psychological and physical force to apprehend criminals and solve crimes. This Article focuses on issues of physical force. After a brief introduction and a review of current legal issues in the use of force, the Article discusses "reasonableness" and the unrealistic expectation which is placed on police to understand, interpret, and follow vague "reasonableness" guidelines. Until the expectations and limitations on the use of force are clarified, in behavioral terms, police officers will …
Deciding To Kill: Revealing The Gender In The Task Handed To Capital Jurors, Joan W. Howarth
Deciding To Kill: Revealing The Gender In The Task Handed To Capital Jurors, Joan W. Howarth
Scholarly Works
Day after day, across this country, ordinary people are summoned to court for a selection process that ultimately leaves them in a room deciding, with other jurors, whether a criminal defendant should be killed. The task handed to these jurors is an awesome, personal, moral decision, encased within the complex legal standards and procedures that constitute modern capital jurisprudence. The doctrine that created and sustains this moment of conscience reflects an ongoing struggle of rule against uncertainty, reason against emotion, justice against mercy, and thus, at one level, male against female. Capital jurisprudence -- the law for deciding whether to …
Fifth Amendment Compelled Statements: Modeling The Contours Of Their Protected Scope, Kate Bloch
Fifth Amendment Compelled Statements: Modeling The Contours Of Their Protected Scope, Kate Bloch
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Gregory M. Matoesian, Reproducing Rape, Dorothy E. Roberts
Book Review Of Gregory M. Matoesian, Reproducing Rape, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In Part I of this Comment, I present a short version of my argument against the admissibility of character impeachment evidence of criminal defendants, showing how the key elements ofthis argument are present in Professor Uviller's own Article. In Part II, I suggest that, notwithstanding Professor Uviller's comments to the contrary, an asymmetrical result-never admitting character evidence to impeach criminal defendants but admitting such evidence in some circumstances to impeach other witnesses- is perfectly reasonable. Finally, in Part III, I contend that Professor Uviller's interesting judicial surveys support the solution I have proposed for the problem of character impeachment evidence.
Is Electrocution An Unconstitutional Method Of Execution? The Engineering Of Death Over The Century, Deborah W. Denno
Is Electrocution An Unconstitutional Method Of Execution? The Engineering Of Death Over The Century, Deborah W. Denno
Faculty Scholarship
This Article provides the Eighth Amendment analysis of electrocution that the courts thus far have not approached. The analysis has two parts. The first inquires whether, according to available scientific evidence, electrocution amounts to cruel and unusual punishment even if it is administered as planned. The second inquires whether, in light of the frequency with which electrocutions are botched, continuing the practice amounts to cruel and unusual punishment even if the properly administered electrocution would not.
When Terry Met Miranda: Two Constitutional Doctrines Collide, Mark A. Godsey
When Terry Met Miranda: Two Constitutional Doctrines Collide, Mark A. Godsey
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Of Laws And Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View Of Criminal Procedure, Bruce A. Green, Daniel C. Richman
Of Laws And Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View Of Criminal Procedure, Bruce A. Green, Daniel C. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The New Reno Bluesheet: A Little More Candor Regarding Prosecutorial Discretion, Sara Sun Beale
The New Reno Bluesheet: A Little More Candor Regarding Prosecutorial Discretion, Sara Sun Beale
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Categorical And Individualized Rights-Ordering On Federal Habeas Corpus, Daniel B. Yeager
Categorical And Individualized Rights-Ordering On Federal Habeas Corpus, Daniel B. Yeager
Faculty Scholarship
This Article criticizes the Supreme Court's treatment of both individualized and categorical bases of relief on federal habeas corpus. Part I notes the Court's trend toward trimming the process that is due in criminal and prisoner litigation generally. This trend may explain the drop in process on habeas as well, but generally declining process cannot explain which rights, if any, should survive the decline. That would require our weighting, if not reconciling, accuracy and dignitary norms, which is the subject of Part II. In Part II, I examine Withrow v Williams, a case from the Court's 1992 Term, which, for …