Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Series

Criminal Law

Evidence

Golden Gate University School of Law

Articles 1 - 13 of 13

Full-Text Articles in Law

Why Cops Lie, Peter Keane Mar 2011

Why Cops Lie, Peter Keane

Publications

Police officer perjury in court to justify illegal dope searches is commonplace. One of the dirty little not-so-secret secrets of the criminal justice system is undercover narcotics officers intentionally lying under oath. It is a perversion of the American justice system that strikes directly at the rule of law. Yet it is the routine way of doing business in courtrooms everywhere in America.


Ninth Circuit Strikes Out On Hearsay, Peter Keane Jan 2011

Ninth Circuit Strikes Out On Hearsay, Peter Keane

Publications

The recent Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opinion, United States v. Barry Bonds , is a murky distortion of an important Federal Rule of Evidence. Quite apart from any celebrity status about a decision regarding the upcoming perjury trial of the former Giants' slugger, the ruling significantly affects the admissibility of evidence in the federal courts in an unfortunate and erroneous way.


People V. Granados [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Dec 1957

People V. Granados [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Defendant was entitled to modification of his conviction of first degree murder to second degree murder because no competent evidence established that he engaged in sexual molestation of a child under the age of 14.


People V. Craig, Jesse W. Carter Nov 1957

People V. Craig, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Without a showing of premeditation or a showing that a murder was committed in an attempt to commit rape, a first degree murder conviction should have been a second degree murder conviction for the killing of the female victim by defendant.


People V. Duroncelay [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jun 1957

People V. Duroncelay [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Defendant's rights were not violated and results of the alcohol test were properly admitted in evidence in trial for driving under the influence of alcohol when extraction was made in a medically approved manner and was incident to the lawful arrest.


People V. Moore [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter May 1957

People V. Moore [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A verdict of first-degree murder was proper under the felony murder doctrine because the evidence showed that the killing occurred in the course of an attempted rape.


People V. Hardenbrook, Jesse W. Carter Apr 1957

People V. Hardenbrook, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

The prior consistent statement of a witness was properly admitted to refute an inference of recent fabrication of the testimony. A lay witness was not competent to testify as to defendant's ability to commit premeditated murder.


People V. Riser [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Dec 1956

People V. Riser [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

In a capital murder prosecution, a trial court's grant of the prosecution's challenge to a juror, who stated that in no event would he vote for the death penalty, was not error.


People V. Linson, Jesse W. Carter Nov 1956

People V. Linson, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Defendant was properly convicted of second degree burglary because there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, and the prosecutor did not commit prejudicial misconduct in his closing argument to the jury.


People V. Cole [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1956

People V. Cole [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Medical opinion as to whether the victim's wound could have been self-inflicted was admissible and sufficient evidence supported the verdict finding defendant guilty of first-degree murder.


People V. Penny, Jesse W. Carter Jul 1955

People V. Penny, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A conviction for involuntary manslaughter was reversed because the jury was erroneously instructed on a civil standard of negligence rather than criminal negligence and the lack of due caution and circumspection.


People V. Costa [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jan 1953

People V. Costa [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A deceased passenger's statement that defendant caused an automobile accident was admissible in defendant's trial for manslaughter as a spontaneous declaration.


People V. Dessauer, Jesse W. Carter Mar 1952

People V. Dessauer, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A defendant's murder trial did not violate due process where evidence was in form of transcript testimony taken at preliminary examination, agreed to by defendant's counsel and, showed that the issue of guilt and sanity were separately considered.