Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Courts (4)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Appellate Courts (1)
- Appellate Jurisdiction (1)
- Appellate Procedure (1)
-
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
- Courts (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal Judges (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Injunctions (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Reform (1)
- Judicial Selection & Appointment (1)
- Law students (1)
- Legal Precedent (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Remand (Venue) (1)
- Statutory Interpretation (1)
- Technology & Law (1)
- Television (1)
- United States Constitution (1)
- United States. Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Eager To Follow: Methodological Precedent In Statutory Interpretation, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Eager To Follow: Methodological Precedent In Statutory Interpretation, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Faculty Publications
An important recent development in the field of statutory interpretation is the emergence of a movement calling for "methodological precedent"--a regime under which courts give precedential effect to interpretive methodology. In such a system, a case would establish not only what a particular statute means but could also establish binding rules of methodology--which tools are valid, in what order, and so on. The movement for methodological precedent has attracted sharp criticism on normative grounds. But both sides of the normative debate agree on the premise that the federal courts generally do not give precedential effect to interpretive methodology today.
This …
We Must Restore Americans' Faith In Our Federal Bench, A. Benjamin Spencer
We Must Restore Americans' Faith In Our Federal Bench, A. Benjamin Spencer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Remand Power And The Supreme Court's Role, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
The Remand Power And The Supreme Court's Role, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Faculty Publications
"Reversed and remanded." Or "vacated and remanded." These familiar words, often found at the end of an appellate decision, emphasize that an appellate court's conclusion that the lower court erred generally does not end the litigation. The power to remand for further proceedings rather than wrap up a case is useful for appellate courts because they may lack the institutional competence to bring the case to a final resolution (as when new factual findings are necessary) or lack an interest in the fact-specific work of applying a newly announced legal standard to the particular circumstances at hand. The modern Supreme …
Professor Katherine Mims Crocker: Reflections On The Fall 2020 Semester, Katherine Mims Crocker
Professor Katherine Mims Crocker: Reflections On The Fall 2020 Semester, Katherine Mims Crocker
Law School Personal Reflections on COVID-19
No abstract provided.
First, We'll Neuter All The Judges, A. Benjamin Spencer
First, We'll Neuter All The Judges, A. Benjamin Spencer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Here There Be Dragons: The Likely Interaction Of Judges With The Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem, Fredric I. Lederer
Here There Be Dragons: The Likely Interaction Of Judges With The Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem, Fredric I. Lederer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.