Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Contract interpretation (2)
- Performance (2)
- Arbitration (1)
- Article 2 (1)
- Breaches of contract (1)
-
- Clients (1)
- Collective bargaining agreements (1)
- Compensation (1)
- Contract formation (1)
- Contract reader (1)
- Contract reading (1)
- Contract terms (1)
- Damages (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Expectations (1)
- External law and public policy (1)
- Information (1)
- Judicial review of arbitration awards (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Lost profits (1)
- Mandatory arbitration (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Offer and acceptance (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Role of arbitrators (1)
- Secrecy (1)
- UCC (1)
- Uniform Commercial Code (1)
- Value (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Mandatory Arbitration: Bane Or Boon?, Theodore St. Antoine
Mandatory Arbitration: Bane Or Boon?, Theodore St. Antoine
Other Publications
Buy a new car that turns out to be a lemon and you may find you can't sue. Fine print in the sales contract often restricts you to arbitration. That means presenting your case before a private person instead of a judge and jury. And the arbitrator may be someone drawn from a panel compiled by the car seller.
Presidential Address: Contract Reading Revisited, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Presidential Address: Contract Reading Revisited, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Book Chapters
A quarter century ago, in a presentation at the Academy’s annual meeting, I used the phrase “contract reader” to characterize the role an arbitrator plays in construing a collective bargaining agreement. That two-word phrase may be the only thing I ever said before this body which has been remembered. Unfortunately, it is almost invariably misunderstood. Time and again members have reproached me: “What’s the big deal about contract reading, anyway? Isn’t it just the same as contract interpretation?” Or, more substantively scathing: “Do you really think, Ted, that all you have to do to interpret a labor agreement is to …
Autistic Contracts (Symposium), James J. White
Autistic Contracts (Symposium), James J. White
Articles
In this paper I address the question whether the law should affirm the offeror's inference and should bind the offeree to the terms proposed by the offeror even in circumstances where the offeree may not intend to accept those terms and where an objective observer might not draw the inference of agreement from the offeree's act. Modem practice and current proposals concerning contract formation in Revised Article 2 and in the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (nee Article 2B) press these issues on us more forcefully than old practices and different law did. 1 But contractual autism is not new; …
The Secrecy Interest In Contract Law, Omri Ben-Shahar, Lisa Bernstein
The Secrecy Interest In Contract Law, Omri Ben-Shahar, Lisa Bernstein
Articles
A long and distinguished line of law-and-economics articles has established that in many circumstances fully compensatory expectation damages are a desirable remedy for breach of contract because they induce both efficient performance and efficient breach. The expectation measure, which seeks to put the breached-against party in the position she would have been in had the contract been performed, has, therefore, rightly been chosen as the dominant contract default rule. It does a far better job of regulating breach-or-perform incentives than its leading competitors-the restitution measure, the reliance measure, and specific performance. This Essay does not directly take issue with the …