Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Freedom of speech (2)
- Freedom of the press (2)
- Natural rights (2)
-
- AI (1)
- Adjudication (1)
- Common law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Cyborg (1)
- Dormant Commerce Clause (1)
- Employment law (1)
- First Amendment Federalism (1)
- Human/AI teaming (1)
- Judging (1)
- Labor law (1)
- Law and inequality (1)
- Natural right (1)
- Nexus (1)
- Quill (1)
- Sales Tax (1)
- State Tax (1)
- State and Local Tax (1)
- Substantial Nexus (1)
- Tax (1)
- Tax Compliance (1)
- Tax Jurisdiction (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Use Tax (1)
- Wayfair (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Scotus Gerrymandering Case: Roberts Didn't Defend Constitutional Democracy, Bruce Ledewitz
Scotus Gerrymandering Case: Roberts Didn't Defend Constitutional Democracy, Bruce Ledewitz
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Invention Of First Amendment Federalism, Jud Campbell
The Invention Of First Amendment Federalism, Jud Campbell
Law Faculty Publications
When insisting that the Sedition Act of 1798 violated the First Amendment, Jeffersonian Republicans cast their argument in historical terms, claiming that the Speech and Press Clauses eliminated any federal power to restrict expression. Scholars, in turn, have generally accepted that Republicans had a consistent understanding of the First Amendment throughout the 1790s. But Founding Era constitutionalism was dynamic in practice, even while often conservative in rhetoric, and scholars have missed the striking novelty of the principal argument against the Sedition Act. Republicans had taken a rights provision and transformed it into a federalism rule.
Mostly ignored in the literature, …
"Cyborg Justice" And The Risk Of Technological-Legal Lock-In, Rebecca Crootof
"Cyborg Justice" And The Risk Of Technological-Legal Lock-In, Rebecca Crootof
Law Faculty Publications
Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already of use to litigants and legal practitioners, we must be cautious and deliberate in incorporating AI into the common law judicial process. Human beings and machine systems process information and reach conclusions in fundamentally different ways, with AI being particularly ill-suited for the rule application and value balancing required of human judges. Nor will “cyborg justice”—hybrid human/AI judicial systems that attempt to marry the best of human and machine decisionmaking and minimize the drawbacks of both—be a panacea. While such systems would ideally maximize the strengths of human and machine intelligence, they might also …
Navigating 21st Century Tax Jurisdiction, Hayes R. Holderness
Navigating 21st Century Tax Jurisdiction, Hayes R. Holderness
Law Faculty Publications
Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. brought dated state tax jurisdiction standards into the twenty-first century, freeing the states to tax internet vendors. However, the decision left the larger state tax jurisdiction doctrine undertheorized and at a crossroads: should the doctrine concern itself only with notice and fairness issues akin to those found in the due process personal jurisdiction realm, or should it also concern itself with protecting interstate commerce from undue state tax burdens?
This Article argues for the latter path by developing a robust theory …
The Enumerated-Rights Reading Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause: A Response To Barnett And Bernick, Kurt T. Lash
The Enumerated-Rights Reading Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause: A Response To Barnett And Bernick, Kurt T. Lash
Law Faculty Publications
In prior scholarship, I have argued that the historical evidence suggests that the public originally understood the Privileges or Immunities Clause as protecting enumerated constitutional rights, including (though not limited to) those rights listed in the first eight amendments, but not as protecting absolute enumerated rights such as the unenumerated right to contract protected in cases like Lochner v. New York. In a recent article, Randy Barnett and Evan Bernick canvass more than two decades of my historical work on the Fourteenth Amendment and claim that I have failed to present a persuasive argument in favor of what they call …
Compelled Subsidies And Original Meaning, Jud Campbell
Compelled Subsidies And Original Meaning, Jud Campbell
Law Faculty Publications
The rule against compelled subsidization of speech is at the forefront of modem First Amendment disputes. Challenges to mandatory union dues, laws preventing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and the federal "contraceptive mandate" have all featured variants of the anti-subsidization principle, reasoning that the government cannot compel people to support the objectionable activities of others. But the literature currently fails to evaluate modem compelled-subsidy doctrine in terms of the original meaning of the First Amendment. This Essay takes up that task.
Approaching any question of original meaning requires a willingness to encounter a constitutional world that looks very …
The Workers' Constitution, Luke Norris
The Workers' Constitution, Luke Norris
Law Faculty Publications
This Article argues that the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, Social Security Act of 1935, and Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 should be understood as a “workers’ constitution.” The Article tells the history of how a connected wave of social movements responded to the insecurity that wage earners faced after the Industrial Revolution and Great Depression by working with government officials to bring about federal collective bargaining rights, wage and hour legislation, and social security legislation. It argues that the statutes are tied together as a set of “small c” constitutional commitments in both their histories and theory. …