Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Senate (2)
- Abercrombie (1)
- Amici curiae (1)
- Chapman v. California (1)
- Confirmation hearing (1)
-
- Confirmation hearings (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional common law (1)
- Constitutional error (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Employment (1)
- FISC (1)
- Federalist papers (1)
- Foreign Intelligence Court (1)
- Harmless-error (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Misperception (1)
- Religion (1)
- Religious discrimination (1)
- Right to Education (1)
- Section 702 (1)
- Supreme Court nominees (1)
- Title VII (1)
- Transparency (1)
- VPN (1)
- Virtual Private Network (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Difficult Questions For The Senate Minority, John M. Greabe
Difficult Questions For The Senate Minority, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
This column is the first in a biweekly Constitutional Connections series that will examine the constitutional implications of various topics in the news. The author, John Greabe, teaches constitutional law and related subject at the University of New Hampshire School of Law. He also serves on the board of trustees of the New Hampshire Institute for Civics Education.
My Turn: 'We The People' And The Garland Nomination, John M. Greabe
My Turn: 'We The People' And The Garland Nomination, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
[Excerpt] "Because I teach constitutional law, a friend recently asked me whether Judge Merrick Garland or President Obama might successfully sue to compel the Senate to take action on the nomination of Judge Garland to fill the vacancy on the United States Supreme Court.
Almost certainly not, I told him. Under settled precedent, a judge would dismiss such a case as raising a non-legal ''political" question. It would be very difficult to develop acceptable decisional standards for such a claim. Moreover, courts are reluctant to entertain lawsuits challenging mechanisms that the Senate uses to oversee the judiciary."
The Riddle Of Harmless Error Revisited, John M. Greabe
The Riddle Of Harmless Error Revisited, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
Half a century ago, in Chapman v. California, the Supreme Court imposed on appellate courts an obligation to vacate or reverse criminal judgments marred by constitutional error unless the government demonstrates that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. But the Court did not explain the juridical status of this obligation or its relation to the federal harmless-error statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2111. In the intervening years, commentators have struggled to make sense of Chapman. Some see it as a constitutional mandate. Others view it as an example of constitutional common law. In THE RIDDLE OF HARMLESS ERROR, written …
Reauthorizing The Fisa Amendments Act: A Blueprint For Enhancing Privacy Protections And Preserving Foreign Intelligence Capabilities, Peter Margulies
Reauthorizing The Fisa Amendments Act: A Blueprint For Enhancing Privacy Protections And Preserving Foreign Intelligence Capabilities, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Religious Discrimination Based On Employer Misperception, Dallan F. Flake
Religious Discrimination Based On Employer Misperception, Dallan F. Flake
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article addresses the circuit split over whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on an employer's misperception of an employee's religion. This is an especially critical issue because misperception-based religious discrimination is likely to increase as the United States continues to experience unprecedented religious diversification. Some courts read Title VII narrowly to preclude such claims, reasoning that the statutory text only prohibits discrimination based on an individual's actual religion. Other courts interpret the statute more expansively in concluding such claims are cognizable because the employer's intent is equally malicious in misperception and conventional discrimination cases. I argue that the statutory …
Reconstituting The Right To Education, Joshua Weishart
Reconstituting The Right To Education, Joshua Weishart
Law Faculty Scholarship
Confronting persistent and widening inequality in educational opportunity, advocates have regarded the right to education as a linchpin for reform. In the forty years since the Supreme Court relegated that right to the domain of state constitutional law, its power has surged and faded in litigation challenging state school finance systems. Like so many of the students it is meant to protect, however, the right to education has generally underachieved, in part because those wielding it have not always appreciated its distinctive forms and function.
Deconstructed, the right to education held by children has been formulated doctrinally as both a …