Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- China (1)
-
- Clerks (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional torts (1)
- Democratic Accountability (1)
- Federal Regulation (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Footnote Four (1)
- Judicial Activism (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- Official immunity (1)
- Qi v. Chen (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Rehnquist (1)
- State Attorney Generals (1)
- State Regulation (1)
- State Taxation (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Unempoweredness principle (1)
- United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Federalism And Accountability: State Attorneys General, Regulatory Litigation, And The New Federalism, Timothy L. Meyer
Federalism And Accountability: State Attorneys General, Regulatory Litigation, And The New Federalism, Timothy L. Meyer
Scholarly Works
This Comment will examine how one particular state institution, state attorneys general (SAGs), has operated within a unique set of institutional and political constraints to create state-based regulation with nationwide impact in policy areas including consumer protection, antitrust, environmental regulation, and securities regulation. This state-based regulation casts doubt on one of the principle rationales advanced in the Supreme Court's anticommandeering line of cases for limiting federal power; namely, that such a move enhances electoral accountability, a concept central to our democracy. If in the absence of federal regulation a series of narrowly accountable state-based actors can create nationwide regulation in …
Fifteen Curious Facts About The Federalist Papers, Dan T. Coenen
Fifteen Curious Facts About The Federalist Papers, Dan T. Coenen
Popular Media
University Professor and Hosch Professor Dan Coenen shares 15 interesting facts about The Federalist Papers, which were written to promote the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
The Essential Holding Of Casey: Rethinking Viability, J. Randy Beck
The Essential Holding Of Casey: Rethinking Viability, J. Randy Beck
Scholarly Works
The Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey plurality acknowledged an obligation to "justify the lines we draw." The corollary would seem to be an obligation to eschew lines that defy principled justification. In the decades since Roe v. Wade, the Court has offered no adequate rationale for the viability standard, notwithstanding persistent judicial and academic critiques. Exacerbating this country's divisions over abortion and placing us out of step with the world community, the viability rule seems a strong candidate for abandonment as the Court continues to rethink its abortion jurisprudence in the aftermath of Casey.
Judicial Activism: An Empirical Examination Of Voting Behavior On The Rehnquist Natural Court, Lori A. Ringhand
Judicial Activism: An Empirical Examination Of Voting Behavior On The Rehnquist Natural Court, Lori A. Ringhand
Scholarly Works
This paper attempts to quantify one of the most deeply contested terms in constitutional law: “judicial activism.” Most discussions of “judicial activism” define activism either in reference to a particular political ideology (such as complaints about “liberal activist judges”) or a particular method of constitutional interpretation (such as assertions that a decision was “activist” because it was not based on the original meaning of the Constitution). This paper sidesteps those debates, focusing instead on an empirical examination of how recent U.S. Supreme Court justices have in fact exercised their judicial power. I do this by examining the voting records of …
The Future Of Footnote Four, Dan T. Coenen
The Future Of Footnote Four, Dan T. Coenen
Scholarly Works
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Carolene Products Co. generated the most famous footnote-and perhaps the most famous passage-in all of the American Judiciary's treatment of constitutional law. Among other things, Footnote Four suggested that "prejudice against discrete and insular minorities may be a special condition, which tends seriously to curtail the operation of those political processes ordinarily to be relied upon to protect minorities, and which may call for a correspondingly more searching judicial inquiry." The importance of this principle cannot be overstated. It pervaded the work of the Warren Court and has played a prominent role …
Imports Or Made-In-China: Comparison Of Two Constitutional Cases In China And The United States, Xiao Li
Imports Or Made-In-China: Comparison Of Two Constitutional Cases In China And The United States, Xiao Li
LLM Theses and Essays
When its economic increase attracts the global attention, China is also looking for a break-through in its judicial reform. The Qi v. Chen case (2001) was considered to be the Chinese version of Marbury v. Madison and gave rise to a heated discussion of the judicial review power in China. This article will analyze the doubts on the Qi case and the prospects of judicial review it indicates through comparison with Marbury v. Madison. Although Qi v. Chen opened the door for constitutional litigation, its dramatic facts and strained application of the Constitution threw it into question. Nevertheless, its effect …
Clerks, Peter B. Rutledge
Clerks, Peter B. Rutledge
Scholarly Works
Book Review of Sorcerers' Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court, Artemus Ward and David L. Weiden. NYU, 2006. Pp xiv, 337. and Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of the Supreme Court Law Clerk, Todd C. Peppers. Stanford, 2006. Pp xv, 301
The "Order-Of-Battle" In Constitutional Litigation, Michael Wells
The "Order-Of-Battle" In Constitutional Litigation, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
This article examines and defends a procedural rule that figures prominently in constitutional tort litigation, has drawn sharp criticism from the federal judiciary, and seems to have lost the support of at least four sitting Supreme Court Justices. In order to recover damages, plaintiffs must not only prove a constitutional violation but also fend off assertions of official immunity. In ruling on motions to dismiss the complaint and motions for summary judgment, a preliminary question is the sequence in which the two issues should be addressed-a problem the Justices call the "order-of-battle." Morse v. Frederick, the "Bong Hits Jesus" case, …
Is "Internal Consistency" Dead?: Reflections On An Evolving Commerce Clause Restraint On State Taxation, Walter Hellerstein
Is "Internal Consistency" Dead?: Reflections On An Evolving Commerce Clause Restraint On State Taxation, Walter Hellerstein
Scholarly Works
Under the "internal consistency" doctrine articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court under the dormant Commerce Clause, a state tax must be structured so that if every state were to impose an identical tax, interstate commerce would fare no worse than intrastate commerce. Although a relatively recent addition to the Court's Commerce Clause jurisprudence, the doctrine has played a significant role as the basis for the judicial invalidation of a wide array of state and local taxes. In American Trucking Associations, Inc., v. Michigan Public Service Commission, 545 U.S. 429 (2005), however, the Court sustained an admittedly "internally inconsistent" $100 per …