Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Tax Strategies And Key Tax Issues In Selling A Business, Part 2, Robert G. Mcelroy
Tax Strategies And Key Tax Issues In Selling A Business, Part 2, Robert G. Mcelroy
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Estate Planning For The Closely Held Business, Dennis I. Belcher, William I. Sanderson
Estate Planning For The Closely Held Business, Dennis I. Belcher, William I. Sanderson
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Tax Strategies And Key Tax Issues In Selling A Business, Part 1, L. Michael Gracik Jr.
Tax Strategies And Key Tax Issues In Selling A Business, Part 1, L. Michael Gracik Jr.
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Using - And Not Losing - Tax Losses, Part 1: Protecting Tax Losses From A Section 382 Ownership Change (Slides), Mark C. Van Deusen
Using - And Not Losing - Tax Losses, Part 1: Protecting Tax Losses From A Section 382 Ownership Change (Slides), Mark C. Van Deusen
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Using - And Not Losing - Tax Losses, Part 2 (Slides), Steven M. Friedman
Using - And Not Losing - Tax Losses, Part 2 (Slides), Steven M. Friedman
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks - Emerging Tax Issues For Distressed Real Estate Assets And Partnerships (Slides), Michael G. Frankel, David A. Miller
Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks - Emerging Tax Issues For Distressed Real Estate Assets And Partnerships (Slides), Michael G. Frankel, David A. Miller
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks - Emerging Tax Issues For Distressed Real Estate Assets And Partnerships, Michael G. Frankel, David A. Miller
Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks - Emerging Tax Issues For Distressed Real Estate Assets And Partnerships, Michael G. Frankel, David A. Miller
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Debt As Venture Capital, Darian M. Ibrahim
Debt As Venture Capital, Darian M. Ibrahim
Faculty Publications
Venture debt, or loans to rapid-growth start-ups, is a puzzle. How are start-ups with no track records, positive cash flows, tangible collateral, or personal guarantees from entrepreneurs able to attract billions of dollars in loans each year? And why do start-ups take on debt rather than rely exclusively on equity investments from angel investors and venture capitalists (VCs), as well-known capital structure theories from corporate finance would seem to predict in this context? Using hand-collected interview data and theoretical contributions from finance, economics, and law, this Article solves the puzzle of venture debt by revealing that a start-up’s VC backing …
Financing The Next Silicon Valley, Darian M. Ibrahim
Financing The Next Silicon Valley, Darian M. Ibrahim
Faculty Publications
Silicon Valley’s success has led other regions to attempt their own high-tech transformations, yet most imitators have failed. Entrepreneurs may be in short supply in these “non-tech” regions, but some non-tech regions are home to high-quality entrepreneurs who relocate to Silicon Valley due to a lack of local financing for their start-ups. Non-tech regions must provide local finance to prevent entrepreneurial relocation and reap spillover benefits for their communities. This Article compares three possible sources of entrepreneurial finance—private venture capital, state-sponsored venture capital, and angel investor groups—and finds that angel groups have distinct advantages when it comes to funding innovation …
A Primer On Protecting Tax Losses From A Section 382 Ownership Change, Mark C. Van Deusen
A Primer On Protecting Tax Losses From A Section 382 Ownership Change, Mark C. Van Deusen
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Debunking The Purchaser Welfare Account Of Section 2 Of The Sherman Act: How Harvard Brought Us A Total Welfare Standard And Why We Should Keep It, Alan J. Meese
Faculty Publications
The last several years have seen a vigorous debate among antitrust scholars and practitionersa bout the appropriates tandardf or evaluating the conduct of monopolists under section 2 of the Sherman Act. While most of the debate over possible standards has focused on the empirical question of each standard's economic utility, this Article undertakes a somewhat different task: It examines the normative benchmark that courts have actually chosen when adjudicating section 2 cases. This Article explores three possible benchmarks-producer welfare, purchaser welfare, and total welfare-and concludes that courts have opted for a total welfare normative approach to section 2 since the …