Law Commons^™

Horton V. O'Cheskey Opinion, Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

Becker V. Becker, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 85 (Oct. 29, 2015), Paul George

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

In response to a certified question by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, the Court concluded that under NRS 21.090(1)(bb) a debtor can exempt his stock in the corporations described in NRS 78.746(2), but his economic interest in that stock is still subject to the charging order remedy in NRS 78.746(1).

Implementing Symmetric Treatment Of Financial Contracts In Bankruptcy And Bank Insolvency, Edward Janger

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Framework For A Formal Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism: The Kiss Principle (Keep It Simple, Stupid) And Other Guiding Principles, Charles W. Mooney Jr.

All Faculty Scholarship

Given the ongoing work on a multilateral restructuring process for sovereign debt in the UN, consideration of the content and implementation of a sovereign debt restructuring mechanism (SDRM) is timely. The framework and content of the SDRM proposed here differs from earlier proposals in several important respects. For the classification and supermajority voting of claims in the approval a restructuring plan, it would mimic the structure and operation of the model collective action clauses (Model CACs) proposed by the International Capital Markets Association. Restructuring under a qualified sovereign debt restructuring law (QSDRL) would be guided by four principles: (i) observe …

Who Gets Paid? Section 365(N) Royalty Payments Under "Zombie Licenses" After A Sale Of Ip, Christopher G. Bradley

Law Faculty Popular Media

This short article discusses the Bankruptcy Code's unusual treatment of certain intellectual property licenses. First, it gives a brief overview of § 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. It then provides a short analysis of a difficult but important question: If a licensee of a debtor’s intellectual property opts to retain its license rights under § 365(n), who should receive the stream of licensing payments in the event that the IP is sold: the buyer of the IP, or the debtor in bankruptcy? The answer that has emerged in some of the case law is somewhat surprising -- after providing nuanced …

In Re Montierth, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 55, Walter Fick

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court held that the separation of a promissory note, held by a principal, and the deed of trust, held by an agent of the principal, does not render either instrument “void,” or require the reunification of the note and the deed of trust in order to foreclose. The Court further held that, under Nevada law and in the case of a contractual principal-agent relationship, the recordation of an assignment of a deed of trust is a “ministerial act.”

Bankruptcy Weapons To Terminate A Zombie Mortgage, Andrea Boyack, Robert Berger

Faculty Publications

Bankruptcy’s strongest public policy is the possibility of a fresh start for a borrower – a way for a debtor to free himself from the burdens of pre-petition obligations and re-commence his or her financial life. A debtor can surrender property burdened by a lien to the lien-holder and thereby release him or herself from ongoing obligations under the loan. This is true even in cases where the collateral’s value is less than the secured loan – for in bankruptcy, a lender’s secured claim is limited to the value of its lien. In chapter 13, a debtor who elects to …

Templeton V. O'Cheskey Opinion, Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

The New Synthesis Of Bank Regulation And Bankruptcy In The Dodd-Frank Era, David A. Skeel Jr.

All Faculty Scholarship

Since the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, U.S. bank regulation and bankruptcy have become far more closely intertwined. In this Article, I ask whether the new synthesis of bank regulation and bankruptcy is coherent, and whether it is likely to prove effective.

I begin by exploring some of the basic differences between bank resolution, which is a highly administrative process in the U.S., and bankruptcy, which relies more on courts and the parties themselves. I then focus on a series of remarkable new innovations designed to facilitate the rapid recapitalization of systemically important financial institutions: convertible contingent capital …

Two Cheers For Universalism: Nortel's Nifty Novelty, John A. E. Pottow

Book Chapters

Individuals in the cross-border bankruptcy community hiding under rocks may not have heard about the monumental decisions in the co-trials in the Canadian-United States Nortel bankruptcy proceedings, In re Nortel Networks, Inc and Re Nortel Networks Corp. The decisions are thoughtful, innovative, practical, and important. They warrant a detailed case comment or two in their own right. This brief article, however, will not provide such worthy treatment. Those hungering for in-depth reports of the cases and their holdings may stop reading now and devote their labours elsewhere. What this article will be is an appreciation of Nortel, explaining …

Beyond Carve-Outs And Toward Reliance: A Normative Framework For Cross-Border Insolvency Choice Of Law, John A. E. Pottow

Law & Economics Working Papers

Choice of law in cross-border insolvency is gaining increased attention, not just by lowly academics but by policymakers who actually matter. I argue it is time to bring some normative guidance to the burgeoning reform efforts. At the highest level of theoretical purity, universalism seems to have (rightly) captured the biggest following. But it has been scaled back by what I call “second-order” considerations of pragmatics to its lesser, modified form. I take that retrenchment as necessary and note how it has been deployed through a carveout-based regime of subject-specific exceptions from lex fori concursus. Given that lay of the …

Sovereign Defaults Before International Courts And Tribunals, John A. E. Pottow, Emily Himes Iversen

Law & Economics Working Papers

This book review probes Michael Waibel’s new book, Sovereign Defaults Before International Courts and Tribunals. Waibel's project is ambitious, exploring international attempts to address sovereign defaults over the past century and a half. Through painstaking and comprehensive historical analysis, Waibel shows how we've been here before -- a sober reminder for those thinking Argentina is simply part of a new fad in financial default. With the UN now turning its attention to sovereign debt issues, this study is especially timely. Although somewhat disappointing in the lightness of its normative content, the book should nevertheless prove helpful to those considering the …

Brief Of Professor Margaret Howard As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Respondents: Bank Of America, N.A. V. Caulkett, Margaret Howard

Scholarly Articles

None available.

May A Bankruptcy Court Award Fees To Debtor's Counsel For Its Work Defending Its Fee Application: Baker Botts V. Asarco (14-103) [Notes], Marshall E. Tracht

Other Publications

The Bankruptcy Code authorizes the retention of lawyers and other professionals to provide necessary services to the trustee or debtor in possession. The lawyers and other professionals must submit fee applications itemizing their work for approval by the bankruptcy court, and those applications can be challenged by creditors and other parties in interest. This case asks whether a bankruptcy court has the authority to award fees to a law firm to cover its work in defending against challenges brought to its fee applications.

Bankruptcy And Education, Keith Sharfman

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Bankruptcy law interacts with education law in a number of respects. A bankrupt educational institution loses access to student financial aid, and its accreditation status is excluded from the bankruptcy estate. Actions by accreditation agencies against bankrupt educational institutions are not subject to the automatic stay. And absent a showing of undue hardship, student loans are not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

The exceptional treatment of educational institutions and their students in bankruptcy reflects a fundamental tension between the goals of bankruptcy law on the one hand and education policy on the other. While bankruptcy law generally seeks to maximize value …

Review Of Sovereign Defaults Before International Courts And Tribunals, John A. E. Pottow, Emily Iversen

Reviews

This book review probes Michael Waibel’s new book, Sovereign Defaults Before International Courts and Tribunals. Waibel's project is ambitious, exploring international attempts to address sovereign defaults over the past century and a half. Through painstaking and comprehensive historical analysis, Waibel shows how we've been here before -- a sober reminder for those thinking Argentina is simply part of a new fad in financial default. With the UN now turning its attention to sovereign debt issues, this study is especially timely. Although somewhat disappointing in the lightness of its normative content, the book should nevertheless prove helpful to those considering the …

Letter To Judge Rhodes: An Evaluation Of The Expert Report Of Martha E.M. Kopacz Regarding The Feasibility Of The City Of Detroit Plan Of Adjustment, Peter J. Hammer

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Motions To Withdraw The Reference - An Empirical Study, Laura B. Bartell

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Stay Imposed - The Failed Policy Of Section 362(C)(4), Laura B. Bartell

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Reflections Of The World Bank’S Report On The Treatment Of The Insolvency Of Natural Persons In The Newest Consumer Bankruptcy Laws: Colombia, Italy, Ireland, 27 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 306 (2015), Jason J. Kilborn

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Pensions Or Paintings?: The Detroit Institute Of Arts From Bankruptcy To Grand Bargain, 24 U. Miami Bus. L. Rev. 1 (2015), Maureen Collins

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

This article examines the issues faced by the City of Detroit and the Detroit Institute of Arts when Detroit filed for municipal bankruptcy. Creditors called for the sale of the highly esteemed DIA art collection to pay outstanding municipal pension obligations. The DIA and the Michigan Attorney General viewed the collection not as an asset, but as a charitable public trust. Simply put, the City faced the question of what mattered most – pensions or paintings? Along the way, the parties and courts struggled with valuation of the art collection, a history of judicial decisions and lawmaking regarding charitable trusts …

"Deemed" Security Interests In Ucc Article 9: Avoiding Traps For The Unwary, 14 Depaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 79 (2015), Paul T. Wangerin

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) Section 1-201(35) provides in its detailed definition of security interests that “security interest” means “an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation.” Other parts of the UCC demonstrate that two relatively distinct kinds of security interests exist. First, the UCC notes that parties to transactions can create security interests by executing “security agreements.” For convenience sake, the security interests created by security agreements can be called “conventional” or “agreed upon” security interests. Second, various sections of the UCC describe security interests that come into existence by operation of law …

Feeling Insecure—A State View Of Whether Investors In Municipal General Obligation Bonds Have A Mere Promise To Pay Or A Binding Obligation, Randle B. Pollard

Scholarly Articles

The City of Detroit's filing for municipal bankruptcy in July, 2013, has added to a continuing controversy of whether general obligation bondholders have a secured lien. The City of Detroit claimed its general obligation bondholders did not have a fully secured lien because the law of the state of Michigan did not create a statutory lien. Without the creation of a lien by state law, during the insolvency or bankruptcy of municipalities, general obligation bondholders will potentially have a mere promise to pay versus a binding obligation to pay, and therefore, will not have a secured lien. Treating otherwise secured …

Rule 9011 Of The Federal Rule Of Bankruptcy Procedure, Nancy Bello

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Rule 9011(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the bankruptcy counterpart to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 11”), provides, that in presenting a pleading to the court, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, that: (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by …

Whether Undistributed Chapter 13 Payment Plan Funds Held By A Chapter 13 Trustee Should Be Distributed To The Debtor Or The Debtor’S Creditors After Conversion From Chapter 13 To Chapter 7, Rosa Aliberti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Qualified individuals seeking to reorganize their debts may file under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under chapter 13, a debtor makes payments according to a court approved payment plan, which is administered by a chapter 13 trustee, and remains in possession of all the property of the estate. Once a debtor makes all his payments under the chapter 13 payment plan, he has a right to seek a discharge, provided that he meets certain requirements. These requirements include that the debtor: (1) certifying that he paid all domestic support obligations prior to the certification being made; (2) received …

The Earmarking Doctrine: Can It Be Used To Protect Late-Recorded Mortgages In Preference Action?, Michael Benzaki

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Borrowers often seek to refinance their home loan mortgages in order to attain more favorable interest rates and other terms. Essentially, in these refinancing transactions, “the parties are looking simply to exchange one more expensive secured loan for another less expensive secured loan.” Typically, as part of the transaction, a refinancing lender will discharge the original mortgage and record a new mortgage. It is not uncommon for a delay to occur such that the new mortgage is recorded over thirty days after the lender transferred the funds to pay off the original loan. In such a case, if the …

The Enforceability Of Abatement Provisions, Shantel Castro

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The moment a lease is executed, a set of obligations and rights are created between the landlord and tenant. In exchange for the payment of rent, the landlord is required to provide a space suited for the intended purpose of the rental. In addition, both parties are obligated to abide by any specific terms in the lease. Among those terms may be an abatement provision. An abatement provision is a clause in the lease that releases a lessee from the obligation to pay rent when a particular event occurs. The specific triggering event is usually listed in the lease. …

Equitable Subordination- Where Is Applies, What It Does, And The Implications That Result, Lauren Casparie

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Equitable subordination, as permitted under section 510(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, provides the court the ability to reorganize creditor’s debt in the light of any inequitable conduct. The code gives courts the ability to subordinate the level of priority of a creditor’s claim in light of any inequitable conduct committed by that creditor. This remedy is applied in cases where the creditor has acted in an inequitable manner, causing injury or creating unjust positions for other creditors. This remedy is remedial, not punitive, and limited only to the extent necessary to remedy the damage caused by the wrongdoing creditor. …

Does The Fdcpa Apply In Bankruptcy?, Garam Choe

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In 1977, Congress enacted the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) to remedy rampant abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors. A year later, the Bankruptcy Code was enacted under Title 11 of the United States Code. Conflicts arise as to whether which law applies when debt collectors use abusive debt collection practices while seeking to recover from a debtor in a bankruptcy case. Circuit courts are split as to whether the Bankruptcy Code displaces the FDCPA in the bankruptcy context. Some circuit courts have concluded that the Bankruptcy Code displaces the FDCPA in the bankruptcy context. Alternatively, some …

Chapter 11 Liquidations And The Termination Of Collective Bargaining Agreements, Cecilia Ehresman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code governs the modification or rejection of a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) by a chapter 11 trustee or debtor-in-possession. To modify or reject a CBA, a trustee or debtor-in-possession must (1) make a proposal to the union which provides the “necessary modifications in the employees benefits and protections that are necessary to permit the reorganization of the debtor”; (2) provide the union with relevant information as is necessary to evaluate the proposal; and (3) meet with the union and confer in good faith. For the modification or rejection to take place, the union must …