Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (14)
- Columbia Law School (12)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- Emory University School of Law (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Washington University in St. Louis (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Duke Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (22)
- Judicial review (8)
- Chevron (7)
- Deregulation (6)
- Government (6)
-
- Law (6)
- Administration (5)
- COVID-19 (5)
- Ohio (5)
- Regulation (5)
- State law; State administrative decision (5)
- Trump (5)
- Administrative (4)
- Agencies (4)
- Congress (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Court (4)
- Democracy (4)
- History (4)
- Litigation (4)
- President (4)
- Regulations (4)
- Rule of law (4)
- Transparency (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Administrative Procedure Act (3)
- Artificial intelligence (3)
- Biden (3)
- Brown (3)
- Civil (3)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- All Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Articles (10)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (5)
-
- Publications (5)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Online Publications (4)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (2)
- Law Librarian Scholarship (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Reports & Public Policy Documents (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Upper Level Writing Requirement Research Papers (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Amici Briefs (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Center on Children, Families, and the Law: Faculty Publications (1)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (1)
- Duke Law Journal Online (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 116
Full-Text Articles in Law
Transition Administration, Michael Herz, Katherine A. Shaw
Transition Administration, Michael Herz, Katherine A. Shaw
Articles
The period from November 3, 2020 to January 20, 2021, was unlike any presidential transition in our history. President Donald Trump refused to accept his ballot-box defeat, instead battling to overturn the election’s outcome. This dramatic public campaign was waged in state and federal courts, state legislatures, the offices of state and local election officials, the Department of Justice, and finally the halls of Congress, where on January 6, 2021, a mob incited by the President stormed the Capitol with the explicit goal of preventing the final counting of electoral votes for Joe Biden. These efforts had more mundane and …
Mass Comments’ Opportunity Costs, Michael Herz
Mass Comments’ Opportunity Costs, Michael Herz
Online Publications
Agencies, courts, and academics agree that notice-and-comment rulemaking is not a referendum. But that conceptualization presents a challenge when an agency is confronted with mass comments. If agencies are not counting but reading comments, and if mass comments are duplicative and often devoid of content beyond a strong expression of values or preference, then what do they add?
Researching Administrative Law, Keith Lacy
Researching Administrative Law, Keith Lacy
Law Librarian Scholarship
Administrative law is a broad subject area concerning the laws and procedures governing administrative agencies. It also encompasses the substantive law produced by those agencies — most commonly in the form of regulations (rules) or agency decisions. This article highlights a few major resources for researching administrative law in the United States.
'Good Administration' And The 'Good': The Normative Foundation For The Protection Of Legitimate Expectations, Wei Yao, Kenny Chng
'Good Administration' And The 'Good': The Normative Foundation For The Protection Of Legitimate Expectations, Wei Yao, Kenny Chng
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
An idea that has gained significant traction in both case law and academic commentary as a justification for the protection of legitimate expectations is the concept of ‘good administration’. Going beyond the usual criticisms of the concept’s ambiguity, this article aims to highlight an additional set of difficulties with the invocation of ‘good administration’ as the normative justification for the doctrine. This article’s central argument is that the concept of ‘good’ invoked by the idea of ‘good administration’ inevitably falls to be substantiated by a particular conception of what the ‘good’ requires as a matter of political philosophy. And given …
Regulating New Tech: Problems, Pathways, And People, Cary Coglianese
Regulating New Tech: Problems, Pathways, And People, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
New technologies bring with them many promises, but also a series of new problems. Even though these problems are new, they are not unlike the types of problems that regulators have long addressed in other contexts. The lessons from regulation in the past can thus guide regulatory efforts today. Regulators must focus on understanding the problems they seek to address and the causal pathways that lead to these problems. Then they must undertake efforts to shape the behavior of those in industry so that private sector managers focus on their technologies’ problems and take actions to interrupt the causal pathways. …
Comment Of Proposed Department Of Labor Regulations On Esg Investing, Prudence And Loyalty, Edward A. Zelinsky
Comment Of Proposed Department Of Labor Regulations On Esg Investing, Prudence And Loyalty, Edward A. Zelinsky
Testimony
DOL’s proposed regulations about ERISA’s fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty weaken the protection of America’s workers and retirees. Accordingly, these proposed regulations should be amended to delete the imprudent, unproven and ambiguous term “ESG,” to add more balanced examples which reduce misperceptions of ERISA’s fiduciary duties, and to expunge altogether the concept of tie-breaking which violates the duty of loyalty by encouraging the pursuit of collateral benefits.
The fundamental claims of ESG advocates are economically implausible. Such advocates assert that they consistently outperform and manipulate competitive markets. This claim is unpersuasive.
ESG proponents assert that a person making an …
Presidential Primacy Amidst Democratic Decline, Arshaf Ahmed, Karen Tani
Presidential Primacy Amidst Democratic Decline, Arshaf Ahmed, Karen Tani
All Faculty Scholarship
Fifty years ago, when the Harvard Law Review asked Professor Harry Kalven, Jr., to take stock of the Supreme Court’s 1970 Term, Kalven faced a task not unlike Professor Cristina Rodríguez’s. That Term’s Court had two new members, Justices Harry Blackmun and Warren Burger. The Nixon Administration was young, but clearly bent on making its own stamp on American law, including via the Supreme Court. Kalven thus expected to see “dislocations” when he reviewed the Court’s recent handiwork. He reported the opposite. Surveying a Term that included such cases as Palmer v. Thompson, Younger v. Harris, Boddie v. …
Habeas Corpus Unbound, Sheila Wildeman
Habeas Corpus Unbound, Sheila Wildeman
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Sites of incarceration present stress tests to our theories and practices of administrative law. They yield insights, too, into how law distributes power across the administrative state. While studying administrative law as prison law reveals certain distinctions between the law that rules in prisons and everyday administrative state operations, it also reveals continuities—for instance, between the surveillance and control characterizing prisons and the routine surveillance and control that police, child welfare, social assistance, mental health, and public health authorities concentrate upon Indigenous, Black, disabled, and poor people in ways that produce and reproduce subordination and disproportionate incarceration. We begin to …
Chevron Flip-Flops Of A Different Sort - Understanding The Shifting Politics Of Deference, Michael E. Herz
Chevron Flip-Flops Of A Different Sort - Understanding The Shifting Politics Of Deference, Michael E. Herz
Online Publications
Like vaccinations, voter fraud, guns, taking a knee, and, well, everything, views on Chevron deference have become not just ideologically tinged but ideologically determined. Progressives are Chevron enthusiasts; conservatives are Chevron skeptics. Chevron is under siege, and the battle lines are familiar. Yet, on its face, Chevron is politically neutral. It increases agency power at the expense of judicial power; whether that is politically helpful depends on whether your team controls the White House or if it controls the courts. Furthermore, the current ideological array has not always been the case. When Chevron was decided, the enthusiasts were …
Who Defends: Judge Sutton's Vision And The Challenge Of A Plural Executive, Katherine A. Shaw
Who Defends: Judge Sutton's Vision And The Challenge Of A Plural Executive, Katherine A. Shaw
Online Publications
It’s no secret that this is a perilous moment for American democracy. We’re nine months out from a deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol, launched with the explicit goal of disrupting the peaceful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election. Congress appears gridlocked on basic questions of debt and spending, and the possibility of a default before the end of the year remains a live one, with the covid pandemic still ongoing. The U.S. Supreme Court is facing an unprecedented legitimacy deficit in the eyes of the public. Election experts warn that future American elections, including the 2024 election, …
The Case For Chevron Deference To Immigration Adjudications, Patrick J. Glen
The Case For Chevron Deference To Immigration Adjudications, Patrick J. Glen
Duke Law Journal Online
Chevron skepticism is in vogue in legal academia, as Professors Shoba Wadhia and Christopher Walker’s recent entry in the genre demonstrates. They place their project within the broader academic trend of arguing for limitations on the application of deference to various administrative decisions, but their aim is ultimately narrower— to show that “this case against Chevron has . . . its greatest force when it comes to immigration.”
The Professors are incorrect. Immigration adjudication presents one of the strongest cases for deference to administrative adjudication. This case is founded in the text of the statute itself and its myriad general …
How Chevron Deference Fits Into Article Iii, Kent H. Barnett
How Chevron Deference Fits Into Article Iii, Kent H. Barnett
Scholarly Works
U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, along with Professor Philip Hamburger, assert that Chevron deference-under which courts defer to reasonable agency statutory interpretations-violates Article III. Chevron does so because, they argue, it either permits agencies, not courts, "to say what the law is" or requires judges to forgo independent judgment by favoring the government's position. If they are correct, Congress could not require courts to accept reasonable agency statutory interpretations under any circumstances. This Article does what these critics, perhaps surprisingly, do not do-situates challenges to Chevron within the broad landscape of the Court's current Article III …
Department Of Homeland Security V. Regents Of The University Of California And Its Implications, Brian Wolfman
Department Of Homeland Security V. Regents Of The University Of California And Its Implications, Brian Wolfman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Trump Administration's effort to get rid of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, failed before the Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1896 (2020). In this essay -- based on a presentation given to an American Bar Association section in September 2020 -- I review DACA, the Supreme Court's decision, and its potential legal implications.
The failure of the Trump Administration to eliminate DACA may have had significant political consequences, and it surely had immediate and momentous consequences for many of DACA’s hundreds of thousands …
It's Time To Reform The U.S. Vulnerabilities Equities Process, Amy Gaudion
It's Time To Reform The U.S. Vulnerabilities Equities Process, Amy Gaudion
Faculty Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Connection Between Policies And Decisions Made Pursuant To Policies, Wei Yao, Kenny Chng
The Connection Between Policies And Decisions Made Pursuant To Policies, Wei Yao, Kenny Chng
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Policies are an indispensable feature of administrative governance. By providing default guidelines for decision-making, policies streamline the everyday administrative work of public authorities, helping to manage the gargantuan task of keeping the machinery of the modern administrative state running smoothly. This article will analyse an issue in the law regulating the usage of administrative policies that has received little attention to date – the connection between the unlawfulness of a policy in itself and the unlawfulness of a decision made pursuant to such a policy. This article will highlight that there is a degree of analytical ambiguity in this area …
Left/Right: Managing The Coming Clash Between Congressional Rights Enforcement And Judicial Doctrine, William D. Araiza
Left/Right: Managing The Coming Clash Between Congressional Rights Enforcement And Judicial Doctrine, William D. Araiza
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
23rd Annual Open Government Summit: Access To Public Records Act, Open Meetings Act Powerpoint Presentation 07-30-2021, Office Of Attorney General State Of Rhode Island, Peter F. Neronha
23rd Annual Open Government Summit: Access To Public Records Act, Open Meetings Act Powerpoint Presentation 07-30-2021, Office Of Attorney General State Of Rhode Island, Peter F. Neronha
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
23rd Annual Open Government Summit: Attorney General State Of Rhode Island : Access To Public Records Act & Open Meetings Act July 30, 2021, Office Of The Attorney General State Of Rhode Island
23rd Annual Open Government Summit: Attorney General State Of Rhode Island : Access To Public Records Act & Open Meetings Act July 30, 2021, Office Of The Attorney General State Of Rhode Island
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Deference Is Dead, Long Live Chevron, Nathan D. Richardson
Deference Is Dead, Long Live Chevron, Nathan D. Richardson
Faculty Publications
Chevron v. NRDC has stood for more than 35 years as the central case on judicial review of administrative agencies’ interpretations of statutes. Its contours have long been debated, but more recently it has come under increasing scrutiny, with some—including two sitting Supreme Court Justices—calling for the case to be overturned. Others praise Chevron, calling deference necessary or even inevitable. All seem to agree the doctrine is powerful and important.
This standard account is wrong, however. Chevron is not the influential doctrine it once was and has not been for a long time. It has been eroded from the outside …
The Clean Air Act Of 1963: Postwar Environmental Politics And The Debate Over Federal Power, Adam D. Orford
The Clean Air Act Of 1963: Postwar Environmental Politics And The Debate Over Federal Power, Adam D. Orford
Scholarly Works
This Article explores the development of the Clean Air Act of 1963, the first law to allow the federal government to fight air pollution rather than study it. The Article focuses on the postwar years (1945-1963) and explores the rise of public health medical research, cooperative federalism, and the desire to harness the powers of the federal government for domestic social improvement, as key precursors to environmental law. It examines the origins of the idea that the federal government should "do something" about air pollution, and how that idea was translated, through drafting, lobbying, politicking, hearings, debate, influence, and votes, …
Legitimacy, Legality, Legacy, And The Life Of Democracy, Joshua Ulan Galperin
Legitimacy, Legality, Legacy, And The Life Of Democracy, Joshua Ulan Galperin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The Trump Administration challenged notions of good governance. It challenged our expectation of majoritarian legitimacy to the extent only a minority of voters elected President Donald Trump in 2016. It challenged our demands for reasoned decision-making insofar as the President sought to dismantle the administrative state and govern by fiat. It challenged our expectation of checks and balances in the way it approached appointments and removals to accumulate power at the expense of congressional design. These challenges sound in different legal theories, but they all reflect shattered expectations of good governance. And yet, the most lasting legacy of the Trump …
The Unmeritorious ‘Legality’/‘Merits’ Distinction In Singapore Administrative Law, Benjamin Joshua Ong
The Unmeritorious ‘Legality’/‘Merits’ Distinction In Singapore Administrative Law, Benjamin Joshua Ong
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The Singapore courts often state that judicial review of executive decision-making ought only to involve an inquiry into the ‘legality’ of a decision or the ‘decision-making process’, and not the ‘decision itself’ or its ‘merits’ – let us call this the ‘Distinction’. This paper argues that the Distinction should be expunged from Singapore law. The Distinction has its roots in English case law which aimed to prevent the courts from arbitrarily substituting their decision for the executive’s by reason of mere disagreement. But Singapore case law has gone further and treated the Distinction as a general principle applicable to all …
The Deregulation Deception, Cary Coglianese, Natasha Sarin, Stuart Shapiro
The Deregulation Deception, Cary Coglianese, Natasha Sarin, Stuart Shapiro
All Faculty Scholarship
President Donald Trump and members of his Administration repeatedly asserted that they had delivered substantial deregulation that fueled positive trends in the U.S. economy prior to the COVID pandemic. Drawing on an original analysis of data on federal regulation from across the Trump Administration’s four years, we show that the Trump Administration actually accomplished much less by way of deregulation than it repeatedly claimed—and much less than many commentators and scholars have believed. In addition, and also contrary to the Administration’s claims, overall economic trends in the pre-pandemic Trump years tended simply to follow economic trends that began years earlier. …
Appeal No. 0990: Ll&B Headwater Ii. L.P. V.Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0990: Ll&B Headwater Ii. L.P. V.Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2020-275; Randall A. Unit (Eclipse Resources I, LP)
The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text, Laverne Jacobs, Martin Anderson, Rachel Rohr, Tom Perry
The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text, Laverne Jacobs, Martin Anderson, Rachel Rohr, Tom Perry
Law Publications
An accessible MS Word version of this document as well as related tables are available for download at the bottom of this screen under "Additional files".
The Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, S.C. 2019, c. 10, which is commonly known as the Accessible Canada Act (ACA) came into force on July 11, 2019. It is Canada’s first piece of federal legislation focusing on accessibility for persons with disabilities.
As a piece of federal legislation, the ACA regulates accessibility for those sectors of the economy that fall under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 91 of the Constitution Act …
Appeal No. 0981:Viking Resources Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0981:Viking Resources Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2019-387
Rwu Law News: The Newsletter Of Roger Williams University School Of Law 04-2021, Michael M. Bowden, Barry Bridges, Political Roundtable
Rwu Law News: The Newsletter Of Roger Williams University School Of Law 04-2021, Michael M. Bowden, Barry Bridges, Political Roundtable
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Fraudulent Transfers And Juries: Was Granfinanciera Rightly Decided?, David G. Carlson
Fraudulent Transfers And Juries: Was Granfinanciera Rightly Decided?, David G. Carlson
Articles
In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that a third party recipient of a fraudulent conveyance had a Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial when a bankruptcy trustee brought suit for a money judgment under Bankruptcy Code section 550(a). This was because, in 1791, an English bankruptcy trustee would have brought fraudulent transfer litigation in a court of law (not a court of equity) and would have obtained a money judgment. I maintain that the Supreme Court committed the classical logical error of Quaternio Terminorum—a false analogy. The analogy was that American bankruptcy trustees are like 18th century English bankruptcy …
Unrules, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, Daniel Walters
Unrules, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, Daniel Walters
All Faculty Scholarship
At the center of contemporary debates over public law lies administrative agencies’ discretion to impose rules. Yet, for every one of these rules, there are also unrules nearby. Often overlooked and sometimes barely visible, unrules are the decisions that regulators make to lift or limit the scope of a regulatory obligation, for instance through waivers, exemptions, and exceptions. In some cases, unrules enable regulators to reduce burdens on regulated entities or to conserve valuable government resources in ways that make law more efficient. However, too much discretion to create unrules can facilitate undue business influence over the law, weaken regulatory …
Unrules, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, Daniel E. Walters
Unrules, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, Daniel E. Walters
Faculty Scholarship
At the center of contemporary debates over public law lies administrative agencies’ discretion to impose rules. Yet for every one of these rules, there are also unrules nearby. Often overlooked and sometimes barely visible, unrules are the decisions that regulators make to lift or limit the scope of a regulatory obligation through, for instance, waivers, exemptions, or exceptions. In some cases, unrules enable regulators to reduce burdens on regulated entities or to conserve valuable government resources in ways that make law more efficient. However, too much discretion to create unrules can facilitate undue business influence over the law, weaken regulatory …