Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (2)
- Administrative rules and regulations (2)
- Judicial deference to IRS rulemaking (2)
- Taxation (2)
- APA (1)
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Administrative state (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Chevron doctrine (1)
- Cooperative federalism (1)
- Deregulation (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Filed rate (1)
- Good cause exception (1)
- Home Concrete (1)
- IRS interpretive regulations (1)
- IRS legislative regulations (1)
- IRS rulings (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Law and Technology (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Mayo Foundation (1)
- New Deal (1)
- Poverty law (1)
- Public Interest (1)
- Public benefits (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Regulatory practice (1)
- Retroactive rules (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antitrust And The 'Filed Rate' Doctrine: Deregulation And State Action, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Antitrust And The 'Filed Rate' Doctrine: Deregulation And State Action, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
In its Keogh decision the Supreme Court held that although the Interstate Commerce Act did not exempt railroads from antitrust liability, a private plaintiff may not recover treble damages based on an allegedly monopolistic tariff rate filed with a federal agency. Keogh very likely grew out of Justice Brandeis's own zeal for regulation and his concern for the protection of small business — in this case, mainly shippers whom he felt were protected from discrimination by filed rates. The Supreme Court's Square D decision later conceded that Keogh may have been “unwise as a matter of policy,” but reaffirmed it …
Enhancing Public Access To Online Rulemaking Information, Cary Coglianese
Enhancing Public Access To Online Rulemaking Information, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
One of the most significant powers exercised by federal agencies is their power to make rules. Given the importance of agency rulemaking, the process by which agencies develop rules has long been subject to procedural requirements aiming to advance democratic values of openness and public participation. With the advent of the digital age, government agencies have engaged in increasing efforts to make rulemaking information available online as well as to elicit public participation via electronic means of communication. How successful are these efforts? How might they be improved? In this article, I investigate agencies’ efforts to make rulemaking information available …
The Regulatory Practitioner, John F. Cooney
The Regulatory Practitioner, John F. Cooney
The Regulatory Review in Depth
No abstract provided.
A Concrete Shoe For Brand X?, David J. Shakow
A Concrete Shoe For Brand X?, David J. Shakow
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s decision in Home Concrete raises new questions about the deference to be given to administrative pronouncements that conflict with prior judicial decisions. Unfortunately, the opinions of a divided Court leave practitioners to puzzle over the boundaries of its decision.
Who’S Afraid Of The Apa?, David J. Shakow
Who’S Afraid Of The Apa?, David J. Shakow
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States means that tax practitioners must be more sensitive to administrative law and judicial deference to administrative rules. This includes gaining some familiarity with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the major cases that deal with judicial deference to administrative action, starting with Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. While the Supreme Court spends a lot more time considering issues of administrative law rather than tax law, the many decisions don’t result in a clear set of rules as to how courts are …
Welfare And Rights Before The Movement: Rights As A Language Of The State, Karen M. Tani
Welfare And Rights Before The Movement: Rights As A Language Of The State, Karen M. Tani
All Faculty Scholarship
In conversations about government assistance, rights language often emerges as a danger: when benefits become “rights,” policymakers lose flexibility, taxpayers suffer, and the poor lose their incentive to work. Absent from the discussion is an understanding of how, when, and why Americans began to talk about public benefits in rights terms. This Article addresses that lacuna by examining the rise of a vibrant language of rights within the federal social welfare bureaucracy during the 1930s and 1940s. This language is barely visible in judicial and legislative records, the traditional source base for legal-historical inquiry, but amply evidenced by previously unmined …