Law Commons^™

Judge In Gay Marriage Case Subject To Speculation - The Associated Press (Quotes: Gerard Bradley) August 6, 2010, Gerard Bradley

Gerard V. Bradley

Judge in gay marriage case subject to speculation - The Associated Press (Quotes: Gerard Bradley) August 6, 2010

Gerard Bradley, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, published a Fox News column in the hours before Walker filed his opinion faulting the media for not forcing Walker to address if he had a personal interest in the outcome of the case.

"I am not saying that Judge Walker should have recused himself in Perry v. Schwarzenegger," Bradley said. "I am not saying so because nowhere (as far as I know) has Judge Walker volunteered or been made to …

State Constitutions And The Basic Structure Doctrine, Manoj Mate

Manoj S. Mate

Think Of The Children: Advancing Marriage Equality By Renewing The Focus On Same-Sex Adoption Litigation, Jacob M. Reif

Jacob M Reif

No abstract provided.

The Future Of Same-Sex Marriage In California, Elizabeth Hollis

Elizabeth Hollis

This article will discuss in detail the issues relating to the rights of same-sex couples wishing to get married in California. First the article examines the history of same-sex marriage in California prior to the most recent Perry v. Brown ruling. The article then focuses on the named plaintiffs in this case, concentrating particularly on their history and how they became involved in the case. Next, the litigation process of Perry v. Brown and the recent decision handed down by Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will be reviewed. Finally, the …

Legal Consciousness And Lgbt Research: The Importance Of Law In The Everyday Lives Of Lgbt Individuals, Nancy J. Knauer

Nancy J. Knauer

The law occupies a prominent place in the everyday lives of LGBT individuals, and the continuing regulation and policing of sexuality and gender weighs heavily on many people who identify as LGBT. Despite remarkable progress in the area of LGBT civil rights, LGBT individuals in the United States still lack formal equality and are denied many of the protections that are afforded other historically disadvantaged groups. These legal disabilities represent an ongoing source of minority stress and can produce a correspondingly high degree of “legal consciousness” within the LGBT community. Given the importance of law in LGBT lives, it is …

Standing At The Crossroads: A Review Of The Novel Issues Of Standing At Play In Perry V. Schwarzenegger, Natasha Mennecke

Natasha Mennecke

This piece examines whether the Proponents of Proposition 8 have standing to appeal the district court's decision invalidating the measure. The paper examines the question of federal Article III standing and whether California Law creates a Liberty Interest sufficient for federal standing.

A Rational Approach To California's Proposition 8, Jennifer Sirrine

Jennifer Sirrine

This comment focuses on California's Proposition 8 and the more searching rational basis test, arguing that the more searching rational basis test is distinct from the traditional level of review. It first analyzes the Supreme Court's precedent regarding the more searching rational basis test, then parses out when the test is applied, and the elements of the test itself. It then applies the more searching rational basis test to California's Proposition 8. Due to the fact the Supreme Court's jurisprudence regarding classifications involving homosexuals is convoluted at best, it further argues that the more searching rational basis test should be …

Reconsidering Arizonans: Proposition 8, Direct Democracy, And The Supreme Court, Frank M. Dickerson Iii, Reid Bolton

Frank M. Dickerson III

The most interesting issue raised by the Proposition 8 litigation in California is the question of standing for ballot-initiative sponsors in defensive litigation and how courts should deal with these unique public “representatives”. This Article argues that ballot-initiative sponsors such as ProtectMarriage.com meet the relevant Article III standing criteria and should be allowed to appeal a district court’s judgments against the proposition. Standing for ballot-initiative sponsors is consistent with both the Constitutional and the prudential concerns underlying the doctrine of standing and allows the proper party to defend an initiative when the government chooses not to. Ballot initiative sponsors play …

Just The Facts: The Perils Of Expert Testimony And Findings Of Fact In Gay Rights Litigation, Libby Adler

Libby S. Adler

ABSTRACT Just the Facts: The Perils of Expert Testimony and Findings of Fact in Gay Rights Litigation Before Perry v. Schwarzenegger, striking down Proposition 8 in California, the judicial victories for same-sex marriage all had been decided on motions for summary judgment. None required the testimony of witnesses; none produced a trial transcript; none resulted in findings of fact. But Judge Vaughn Walker of the Northern District of California presided over a trial. He made eighty separate factual findings, many of them facts about gay people drawn from the testimony of plaintiffs’ experts – and many are contradictory. The plaintiffs …

On Equality: The Anti-Interference Principle, Donald J. Kochan

Donald J. Kochan

This Essay introduces the “Anti-Interference Principle” – a new term on the meaning of equality, or at least one not yet so-named in the equality lexicon – as a necessary foundation for achieving the goal of true equality. Equality has a long-standing place in the discussion of politics and jurisprudence and remains a struggle of definition today. Rather than rehash the mass of scholarship, this Essay seeks to summarize the general equality concept, and propose that the legal discourse on equality center on a requirement that governmental power must protect and respect equal treatment and opportunity, unconstrained, not equal outcomes. …

Standing In The Age Of Citizen Revolt: Legislative Standing, Direct Democracy, And The Supreme Court, Frank M. Dickerson Iii, Reid M. Bolton

Frank M. Dickerson III

One of the most interesting questions raised by California’s Proposition 8 is the question of standing for ballot-initiative supporters in defensive litigation. This Article addresses the question raised in the Proposition 8 case and the issue of standing for ballot initiative supporters to defend their initiative on appeal more generally. It suggests that such standing for ballot-initiative sponsors is consistent with both prior Supreme Court precedent and the Constitutional and prudential concerns underlying the doctrine of standing.

'Activist Courts,' Misleading Wedge Politics And The Tragedy Of Proposition 8, M. Katherine B. Darmer

M. Katherine B. Darmer

This paper explains that Proposition 8 was uniquely devastating in that it stripped vested marriage rights away from a protected minoirty group. Previously, where voters sought to define marriage narrowly to exlude gay and lesbian couples, voters did so in advance of gay and lesbian couples having such rights. The paper defends the California Supreme Court's decision in the May 15, 2008 "Marriage Cases," criticizes misleading advertising ploys of the Proposition 8 campaign and broadly defends the role of the courts in ensuring equal protection, drawing parallels between the current fight for marriage equality and earlier fights for the rights …

Truth And Consequences: Mitt Romney, Proposition 8, And Public Reason, Frederick Mark Gedicks

Frederick Mark Gedicks

Although formal religious tests for federal office are constitutionally prohibited, they have long been a fact of political life in presidential elections. John Kennedy remains the only nonProtestant ever elected President, and the major political parties have only nominated three others for president, all Democrats. The "Judeo-Christian tradition" notwithstanding, no major party has ever nominated a Jew for president-let alone a Buddhist, Hindu, Mormon, Muslim, or unbeliever. Against this electoral history, it was perhaps predictable that mainstream Christian commentators would feel free to legitimate religious attacks on Mitt Romney during the Republican presidential primaries on the ground that Mormonism is …

Moving Beyond The 'Immutability Debate' In The Fight For Equality After, M. Katherine B. Darmer

M. Katherine B. Darmer

On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its historic decision regarding marriage rights for same-sex couples. In the course of its opinion, the court found that classifications based upon sexual orientation are subject to the protections of "strict scrutiny" for purposes of the state's equal protection clause. The court also found that marriage is a fundamental right that extends to same-sex couples.

On November 4, 2008, 52% of California voters voted for Proposition 8, which purported to "amend" the state constitution by adding fourteen words in a new clause following the equal protection clause: "only marriage between a …