Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- First Amendment (9)
- Human Rights Law (9)
- Criminal Law (8)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Internet Law (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legal History (2)
- National Security Law (2)
- Rule of Law (2)
- African Languages and Societies (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Communication (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Elder Law (1)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Robert Kahn (3)
- Alan E Garfield (2)
- David Barnhizer (2)
- Germán M. Teruel Lozano (2)
- Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London (2)
-
- ALFREDO COLL (1)
- Berta E. Hernández-Truyol (1)
- Bill Ong Hing (1)
- Charlotte H. Taylor (1)
- Daniel Koontz (1)
- Danielle Keats Citron (1)
- Deborah W. Post (1)
- Diane Orentlicher (1)
- Gregory S. Gordon (1)
- Kate Kovarovic (1)
- Neil J Foster (1)
- Noah B Novogrodsky (1)
- Rod Smolla (1)
- Sarah E Ryan (1)
- Steven H. Shiffrin (1)
- Thomas A. Schweitzer (1)
- Victor C. Romero (1)
- W. Bradley Wendel (1)
- Wilson R. Huhn (1)
- raphael cohen-almagor (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hate Speech Debate Has Roots In Us History, Rodney A. Smolla
Hate Speech Debate Has Roots In Us History, Rodney A. Smolla
Rod Smolla
No abstract provided.
Hate Speech And The First Amendment, Alan E. Garfield
Hate Speech And The First Amendment, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
This Is Why We Protect Hate Speech, Alan E. Garfield
This Is Why We Protect Hate Speech, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
Why Confronting The Internet’S Dark Side?, Raphael Cohen-Almagor
Why Confronting The Internet’S Dark Side?, Raphael Cohen-Almagor
raphael cohen-almagor
Raphael Cohen-Almagor, the author of Confronting the Internet's Dark Side, explains his motivation for exploring the dangerous side of the world wide web. This new book is the first comprehensive book on social responsibility on the Internet.
La Libertad De Expresión Frente A Los Delitos De Negacionismo Y De Provocación Al Odio Y A La Violencia: Sombras Sin Luces En La Reforma Del Código Penal, Germán M. Teruel Lozano
La Libertad De Expresión Frente A Los Delitos De Negacionismo Y De Provocación Al Odio Y A La Violencia: Sombras Sin Luces En La Reforma Del Código Penal, Germán M. Teruel Lozano
Germán M. Teruel Lozano
Racist and negationist speeches are at the border of tolerable messages in a democratic society. This paper will explore the limits to freedom of speech in the Spanish law, which is configured as a constitutional order «open» and based on the idea of «person», contrasting with the militant model characteristic of the European Convention on Human Rights. Then, once outlined the content of this freedom, the paper will submit to constitutional review the Holocaust denial crime and hate speech crimes after the reform of the Criminal Code in 2015, from a constitutional-criminal law perspective.
Rethinking The Context Of Hate Speech Regulation, Robert Kahn
Rethinking The Context Of Hate Speech Regulation, Robert Kahn
Robert Kahn
In this essay I review Michael Herz and Peter Molnar (eds.) The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses (Cambridge University Press 2012). As I show in the review, the Herz and Molnar volume advances our understanding of comparative hate speech regulation in three ways. First, the essays suggest that local context has a role to play in understanding, assessing, and applying hate speech regulations, even in an age when online hate speech is pressuring states and regions to reach common solutions to these problems. Second, the essays rebut the commonly held premise that the United States …
Racist Speech, Outsider Jurisprudence, And The Meaning Of America, Steven H. Shiffrin
Racist Speech, Outsider Jurisprudence, And The Meaning Of America, Steven H. Shiffrin
Steven H. Shiffrin
No abstract provided.
Restricting Hate Speech Against Private Figures: Lessons In Power-Based Censorship From Defamation Law, Victor C. Romero
Restricting Hate Speech Against Private Figures: Lessons In Power-Based Censorship From Defamation Law, Victor C. Romero
Victor C. Romero
This article examines the debate between those who favor greater protection for minorities vulnerable to hate speech and First Amendment absolutists who are skeptical of any burdens on pure speech. The author also provides another perspective on the debate by highlighting the "public/private figure" distinction as an area within First Amendment law that acknowledges differences in power, a construct anti-hate speech advocates should use to further their cause. Specifically, the author places the "public/private figure" division in a theoretical and historical context and then provides empirical support for the thesis that whites enjoy a more prominent societal role and greater …
“Certain Fundamental Truths”: A Dialectic On Negative And Positive Liberty In Hate-Speech Cases, W. Bradley Wendel
“Certain Fundamental Truths”: A Dialectic On Negative And Positive Liberty In Hate-Speech Cases, W. Bradley Wendel
W. Bradley Wendel
Matthew Hale is a white supremacist who likes to attract media attention. He set himself up as the leader of a racist "church" called the World Church of the Creator and immediately went about attempting to put an articulate, polite face on the organization. Hale's application to become a licensed attorney in Illinois, his subsequent denial and the litigation that followed are discussed.
Globally Speaking - Honoring The Victims' Stories: Matsuda's Human Rights Praxis, Berta E. Hernández-Truyol
Globally Speaking - Honoring The Victims' Stories: Matsuda's Human Rights Praxis, Berta E. Hernández-Truyol
Berta E. Hernández-Truyol
Globally speaking, international law and the vast majority of domestic legal systems strive to protect the right to freedom of expression. The United States’ First Amendment provides an early historical protection of speech—a safeguard now embraced around the world. The extent of this protection, however, varies among states. The United States stands alone in excluding countervailing considerations of equality, dignitary, or privacy interests that would favor restrictions on speech. The gravamen of the argument supporting such American exceptionalism is that free expression is necessary in a democracy. Totalitarianism, the libertarian narrative goes, thrives on government control of information to the …
La Lucha Del Derecho Contra El Negacionismo: Una Peligrosa Frontera. Particular Estudio De Los Ordenamientos Italiano Y Español, Germán M. Teruel Lozano
La Lucha Del Derecho Contra El Negacionismo: Una Peligrosa Frontera. Particular Estudio De Los Ordenamientos Italiano Y Español, Germán M. Teruel Lozano
Germán M. Teruel Lozano
The struggle of the Law against negationism: a dangerous border. Particular study of the Spanish and Italian legal system (PhD. Thesis) - The document content an abstract of the thesis in English, Spanish and Italian.
Recent Uk Case Connected With Sexual Orientation “Hate Speech”, Neil J. Foster
Recent Uk Case Connected With Sexual Orientation “Hate Speech”, Neil J. Foster
Neil J Foster
Discusses the decision in R (On the Application Of Core Issues Trust) v Transport for London [2014] EWCA Civ 34 (27 January 2014) dealing with signs on London buses alleged to be "homophobic".
Surveillance, Speech Suppression And Degradation Of The Rule Of Law In The “Post-Democracy Electronic State”, David Barnhizer
Surveillance, Speech Suppression And Degradation Of The Rule Of Law In The “Post-Democracy Electronic State”, David Barnhizer
David Barnhizer
None of us can claim the quality of original insight achieved by Alexis de Tocqueville in his early 19th Century classic Democracy in America in his observation that the “soft” repression of democracy was unlike that in any other political form. It is impossible to deny that we in the US, the United Kingdom and Western Europe are experiencing just such a “gentle” drift of the kind that Tocqueville describes, losing our democratic integrity amid an increasingly “pretend” democracy. He explained: “[T]he supreme power [of government] then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society …
The Forgotten Nuremberg Hate Speech Case: Otto Dietrich And The Future Of Persecution Law, Gregory S. Gordon
The Forgotten Nuremberg Hate Speech Case: Otto Dietrich And The Future Of Persecution Law, Gregory S. Gordon
Gregory S. Gordon
Among international jurists, the conventional wisdom is that atrocity speech law sprang fully formed from two judgments issued by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (IMT): the crimes against humanity conviction of Nazi newspaper editor Julius Streicher, and the acquittal on the same charge of Third Reich Radio Division Chief Hans Fritzsche. But the exclusive focus on the IMT judgments as the founding texts of atrocity speech law is misplaced. Not long after Streicher and Fritzsche, and in the same courtroom, the United States Nuremberg Military Tribunal (NMT) in the Ministries Case, issued an equally significant crimes against …
Why Do Europeans Ban Hate Speech? A Debate Between Karl Loewenstein And Robert Post, Robert Kahn
Why Do Europeans Ban Hate Speech? A Debate Between Karl Loewenstein And Robert Post, Robert Kahn
Robert Kahn
European countries restrict hate speech, the United States does not. This much is clear. What explains this difference? Too often the current discussion falls back on a culturally rich but normatively vacant exceptionalism (American or otherwise) or a normatively driven convergence perspective that fails to address historical, cultural and experiential differences that distinguish countries and legal systems. Inspired by the development discourse of historical sociology, this article seeks to record instances where Americans or Europeans have argued their approach to hate speech laws was more “advanced” or “modern.”
To that end this article focuses on two authors whose writing appears …
"Linguistic Cleansing": Strategies For Redesigning Human Perception And Behavior, David Barnhizer
"Linguistic Cleansing": Strategies For Redesigning Human Perception And Behavior, David Barnhizer
David Barnhizer
James Madison recognized the need to balance competing interests in his analysis of factious groups. In Federalist No. 10, Madison sets out the idea of faction in the following words. “By a faction I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” Madison goes on to describe two “cures” for faction. One is to “destroy the liberty” that allows it to bloom, …
Criminalizing Hate Speech: A Comment On The Ictr’S Judgment In The Prosecutor V. Nahimana, Et Al., Diane F. Orentlicher
Criminalizing Hate Speech: A Comment On The Ictr’S Judgment In The Prosecutor V. Nahimana, Et Al., Diane F. Orentlicher
Diane Orentlicher
No abstract provided.
Who's The Fascist? Uses Of The Nazi Past At The Geert Wilders Trial, Robert Kahn
Who's The Fascist? Uses Of The Nazi Past At The Geert Wilders Trial, Robert Kahn
Robert Kahn
ABSTRACT: This essay looks at how, during his trial, Geert Wilders and his opponents used references to the Nazi era – including but not limited to the Holocaust – to frame debates over Muslim immigration, Wilders himself, and the acceptability of hate speech trials. The Wilders trial is especially interesting because each side sought to call the other a “fascist.” For Wilders, the Quran was a fascist book, an Islamic Mein Kampf. To his opponents, Wilders was a “prototypical” fascist, one who spoke to the gut not the mind. But perhaps the strongest use of the Nazi past involved victims. …
Judging Stories, Noah Novogrodsky
Judging Stories, Noah Novogrodsky
Noah B Novogrodsky
Judging Stories Abstract This Article uses the confluence of incitement to genocide and hate speech in a single case to explore the power of stories in law. That power defines how we see the world, how we form communities of meaning and how we speak to one another. Previous commentators have recognized that law is infused with stories, from the narratives of litigants, to the rhetoric of lawyers, to the tales that judges interpret and create in the form of written opinions. This Article builds on those insights to address the problems posed by transnational speech and the question of …
Fulfilling The U.S. Obligation To Prevent Exterminationism: A Comprehensive Approach To Regulating Hate Speech And Dismantling Systems Of Genocide., Sarah E. Ryan
Sarah E Ryan
No abstract provided.
Race, Riots And The Rule Of Law, Deborah Waire Post
Race, Riots And The Rule Of Law, Deborah Waire Post
Deborah W. Post
No abstract provided.
Hate Speech On Campus And The First Amendment: Can They Be Reconciled?, Thomas Schweitzer
Hate Speech On Campus And The First Amendment: Can They Be Reconciled?, Thomas Schweitzer
Thomas A. Schweitzer
No abstract provided.
Intermediaries And Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship For Our Information Age, Danielle Keats Citron, Helen L. Norton
Intermediaries And Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship For Our Information Age, Danielle Keats Citron, Helen L. Norton
Danielle Keats Citron
No longer confined to isolated corners of the web, cyber hate now enjoys a major presence on popular social media sites. The Facebook group Kill a Jew Day, for instance, acquired thousands of friends within days of its formation, while YouTube has hosted videos with names like How to Kill Beaners, Execute the Gays, and Murder Muslim Scum. The mainstreaming of cyber hate has the troubling potential to shape public expectations of online discourse. Internet intermediaries have the freedom and influence to seize this defining moment in cyber hate’s history. We believe that a thoughtful and nuanced intermediary-based approach to …
Freedom Of Speech In American & Spanish Law: A Comparative Perspective, Alfredo Coll
Freedom Of Speech In American & Spanish Law: A Comparative Perspective, Alfredo Coll
ALFREDO COLL
The Supreme Court of the United States, particularly in the area of obscenity within freedom of speech, has imposed stringent procedural requirements on governmental action aimed at controlling the exercise of first amendment rights. This study argues that several lessons can be learned from these cases: that a judicial body, following an adversary hearing, must decide on the protected character of the speech, and that the judicial determination must either precede or immediately follow any governmental action which restricts speech. The authors also compare and contrast free speech protection in the United States as compared to Spain by analyzing several …
One Spark Can Set A Fire: The Role Of Intent In Incitement To Genocide, Kate Kovarovic
One Spark Can Set A Fire: The Role Of Intent In Incitement To Genocide, Kate Kovarovic
Kate Kovarovic
The world was introduced to an entirely new method of warfare during World War II: that which was fought with words. Hitler mastered the art of media manipulation, and the world struggled to overcome his capacity to influence the German people. After the war, the international community felt compelled to restrict the type of conduct that had enabled Hitler to so easily gain control of his audiences. However, legal scholars struggled to balance this need with the protection of free speech. Eventually, the Genocide Convention was drafted to explicitly prohibit direct and public incitement to genocide, but not mere hate …
Hate Speech And Government Speech, Charlotte H. Taylor
Hate Speech And Government Speech, Charlotte H. Taylor
Charlotte H. Taylor
Hate Speech and Government Speech
After a spate of hate speech incidents involving nooses provoked outcry in 2007, the immediate response was regulation. A number of states passed laws proscribing the placing of a noose on private property with the intent to intimidate. This response reanimates the familiar debate between those who seek to ban hate speech—the “anti-subordination camp”—and those who oppose such prohibitions on speech—the “free speech camp.” At loggerheads since the movement to institute anti-hate speech laws first gathered momentum in the late 1980s, these two camps fundamentally disagree over how to reconcile the constitutional value of equality …
Wild-West Cowboys Versus Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys: Some Problems In Comparative Approaches To Extreme Speech, Eric Heinze
Wild-West Cowboys Versus Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys: Some Problems In Comparative Approaches To Extreme Speech, Eric Heinze
Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London
All European states ban some form of hate speech. US law precludes such bans. In view of the political and symbolic importance of free speech, it becomes tempting to assume that trans-Atlantic differences towards hate speech reflect deeper cultural divisions.
However, we must pay attention to comparative methodology before drawing ambitious conclusions about cross-cultural social and political differences that derive solely from differences in formal, black-letter norms. In this volume, Robert Post claims that formal, constitutional requirements of content-neutral regulation reflect a freer public sphere in the US, in contrast to the European public sphere.
Yet a legal-realist approach casts …
Cumulative Jurisprudence And Hate Speech: Sexual Orientation And Analogies To Disability, Age And Obesity, Eric Heinze
Cumulative Jurisprudence And Hate Speech: Sexual Orientation And Analogies To Disability, Age And Obesity, Eric Heinze
Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London
Non-discrimination norms in human rights instruments generally enumerate specified categories for protection, such as race, ethnicity, sex or religion, etc. They often omit express reference to sexual minorities.
Through open-ended interpretation, however, sexual minorities subsequently become incorporated. That ‘cumulative jurisprudence’ yields protections for sexual minorities through norms governing privacy, employment, age of consent, or freedoms of speech and association.
Hate speech bans, too, are often formulated with reference to traditionally recognised categories, particularly race and religion. It might be expected that the same cumulative jurisprudence should therefore be applied to include sexual minorities. In this article, that approach is challenged. …
Cross Burning A Hate Speech Under The First Amendment To The United States Constitution, Wilson Huhn
Cross Burning A Hate Speech Under The First Amendment To The United States Constitution, Wilson Huhn
Wilson R. Huhn
Under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, ‘hate speech’ is constitutionally protected unless the circumstances of the case indicate that the speaker intended to threaten violence or provoke an immediate act of violence. While a person may be removed from a classroom or fired from employment for engaging in ‘hate speech’, under the First Amendment a person may be charged with a crime only if their statements constitute a threat or provocation of immediate violence. Moreover, even in cases where it is clear that a person is threatening violence or that violence is imminent, the person …
Hostile Public Accommodations Laws And The First Amendment, Daniel Koontz
Hostile Public Accommodations Laws And The First Amendment, Daniel Koontz
Daniel Koontz
State and municipal Human Rights Commissions have recently begun aggressively interpreting public accommodations laws to punish the speech of proprietors of bars, restaurants, country clubs, and other public accommodations. The theory is that if a proprietor says something to a customer—or even displays artwork, decorations, or signs—that could potentially offend the customer based on race, religion, sex, or ancestry, the proprietor has created a “hostile environment” which denies the customer “full and equal enjoyment” of the public accommodation.
Proprietors can face liability even in the absence of allegations that they refused service to a customer. In one case, a human …