Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (45)
- First Amendment (12)
- Courts (10)
- Criminal Law (9)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (8)
-
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Judges (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Conflict of Laws (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Military, War, and Peace (3)
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Communications Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Chemerinsky (15)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (13)
- Supreme Court (13)
- Section 1983 (6)
- Supreme court (6)
-
- Federalism (5)
- Qualified immunity (5)
- Due process (4)
- Freedom of speech (4)
- Schwartz (4)
- Supreme Court Review (4)
- First amendment (3)
- Free speech (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Race discrimination (3)
- Second Amendment (3)
- 1st amendment (2)
- 2005 (2)
- 2006 (2)
- Abood (2)
- Absolute immunity (2)
- Anthony Kennedy (2)
- Church and State (2)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Color of state law (2)
- Constitutional Interpretation (2)
- Constitutional rights (2)
- Court (2)
- Davenport (2)
- Davenport v. Washington Education Association (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 253
Full-Text Articles in Law
In Defense Of Judicial Supremacy, Erwin Chemerinsky
In Defense Of Judicial Supremacy, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
“Judicial supremacy” is the idea that the Supreme Court should be viewed as the authoritative interpreter of the Constitution and that we should deem its decisions as binding on the other branches and levels of government, until and unless constitutional amendment or subsequent decision overrules them. This is desirable because we want to have an authoritative interpreter of the Constitution and the Court is best suited to play this role. Under this view, doctrines which keep federal courts from enforcing constitutional provisions—such as denying standing for generalized grievances, the political question doctrine, and the state secrets doctrine—are misguided and should …
Protect The Press: A First Amendment Standard For Safeguarding Aggressive Newsgathering, Erwin Chemerinsky
Protect The Press: A First Amendment Standard For Safeguarding Aggressive Newsgathering, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
Few occu.pations or professions rank lower than reporters in public esteem. In July 1999, Justice Stephen Breyer participated as a panelist at the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference and was challenged by Associated Press reporter Linda Deutsch about the absence of cameras in the Supreme Court. Justice Breyer explained that the Court did not want to risk its relatively high level of public esteem by placing itself on television. Justice Breyer noted the lack of respect for the media and said that the Court did not want to see its esteem ratings lowered to that of the press.
Judging Opportunity Lost: Assessing The Viability Of Race-Based Affirmative Action After Fisher V. University Of Texas, Mario L. Barnes, Erwin Chemerinsky, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Judging Opportunity Lost: Assessing The Viability Of Race-Based Affirmative Action After Fisher V. University Of Texas, Mario L. Barnes, Erwin Chemerinsky, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Panel Discussion: Log Cabin Republicans V. United States: Litigating "Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Danielle Hart, Terry Hatter, Dan Woods, Erwin Chemerinsky
Panel Discussion: Log Cabin Republicans V. United States: Litigating "Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Danielle Hart, Terry Hatter, Dan Woods, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Turning Sharply To The Right, Erwin Chemerinsky
Turning Sharply To The Right, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
The Kennedy Court: October Term 2005, Erwin Chemerinsky
The Kennedy Court: October Term 2005, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Toward A Practical Definition Of The Rule Of Law, Erwin Chemerinsky
Toward A Practical Definition Of The Rule Of Law, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Protecting Lawyers From Their Profession: Redefining The Lawyer's Role, Erwin Chemerinsky
Protecting Lawyers From Their Profession: Redefining The Lawyer's Role, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Marijuana Laws And Federalism, Erwin Chemerinsky
Introduction: Marijuana Laws And Federalism, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of Judicial Supremacy, Erwin Chemerinsky
In Defense Of Judicial Supremacy, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
The End Of An Era: October Term 2004, Erwin Chemerinsky
The End Of An Era: October Term 2004, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of The Proposed California Civil Rights Initiative, Erwin Chemerinsky
The Impact Of The Proposed California Civil Rights Initiative, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Students Do Leave Their First Amendment Rights At The Schoolhouse Gates: What's Left Of Tinker?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Students Do Leave Their First Amendment Rights At The Schoolhouse Gates: What's Left Of Tinker?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Constitution And Fundamental Rights, Erwin Chemerinsky
Foreword: The Constitution And Fundamental Rights, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Everything Changed: October Term 2015, Erwin Chemerinsky
Everything Changed: October Term 2015, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Federalism Not As Limits, But As Empowerment, Erwin Chemerinsky
Federalism Not As Limits, But As Empowerment, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Defining The "Best Interests": Constitutional Protections In Involuntary Adoptions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Defining The "Best Interests": Constitutional Protections In Involuntary Adoptions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Abortion: A Woman's Private Choice, Erwin Chemerinsky, Michele Goodwin
Abortion: A Woman's Private Choice, Erwin Chemerinsky, Michele Goodwin
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Enemy Combatants And Separation Of Powers, Erwin Chemerinsky
Enemy Combatants And Separation Of Powers, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of Judicial Review: The Perils Of Popular Constitutionalism, Erwin Chemerinsky
In Defense Of Judicial Review: The Perils Of Popular Constitutionalism, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Charlie, Erwin Chemerinsky
Have The Rehnquist Court's Federalism Decisions Increased Liberty, Erwin Chemerinsky
Have The Rehnquist Court's Federalism Decisions Increased Liberty, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
When It Matters Most, It Is Still The Kennedy Court, Erwin Chemerinsky
When It Matters Most, It Is Still The Kennedy Court, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong About The Solomon Amendment, Erwin Chemerinsky
Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong About The Solomon Amendment, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
The Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. FAIR abandoned basic First Amendment principles. The decision cannot be reconciled with other cases concerning freedom of speech and association. Indeed, if followed, Rumsfeld v. FAIR sets a disturbing and dangerous precedent.
Wrong Questions Get Wrong Answers: An Analysis Of Professor Carter’S Approach To Judicial Review, Erwin Chemerinsky
Wrong Questions Get Wrong Answers: An Analysis Of Professor Carter’S Approach To Judicial Review, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Why Write?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Why Write?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
This wonderful collection of reviews of leading recent books about law provides the occasion to ask a basic question: why should law professors write? There are many things that law professors could do with the time they spend writing books and law review articles. More time and attention could be paid to students and to instructional materials. More professors could do pro bono legal work of all sorts. In fact, if law professors wrote much less, teaching loads could increase, faculties could decrease in size, and tuition could decrease substantially. The answer to the question "why write" is neither intuitive …
Why The Rehnquist Court Is Wrong About The Establishment Clause, Erwin Chemerinsky
Why The Rehnquist Court Is Wrong About The Establishment Clause, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Why Justice Breyer Was Wrong In Van Orden V. Perry, Erwin Chemerinsky
Why Justice Breyer Was Wrong In Van Orden V. Perry, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Training The Ethical Lawyer: A Rejoinder To Schneyer, Erwin Chemerinsky
Training The Ethical Lawyer: A Rejoinder To Schneyer, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Wartime Security And Constitutional Liberty: Detainees, Erwin Chemerinsky
Wartime Security And Constitutional Liberty: Detainees, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.