Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Judicial Safeguards Of Federalism, John C. Yoo May 2015

The Judicial Safeguards Of Federalism, John C. Yoo

John C Yoo

No abstract provided.


Saving Originalism, Robert J. Delahunty, John Yoo May 2015

Saving Originalism, Robert J. Delahunty, John Yoo

John C Yoo

It is sometimes said that biographers cannot help but come to admire, even love, their subjects. And that adage seems to ring true of Professor Amar, the foremost “biographer” of the Constitution. He loves it not just as a governing structure, or a political system, but as a document. He loves the Constitution in the same way that a fan of English literature might treasure Milton’s Paradise Lost or Shakespeare’s Macbeth. He loves the Constitution not just for the good: the separation of powers, federalism, and the Bill of Rights. He also loves it for its nooks and crannies, idiosyncrasies, …


Who's Afraid Of The Eleventh Amendment - The Limited Impact Of The Court's Sovereign Immunity Rulings, Jesse H. Choper, John C. Yoo May 2015

Who's Afraid Of The Eleventh Amendment - The Limited Impact Of The Court's Sovereign Immunity Rulings, Jesse H. Choper, John C. Yoo

John C Yoo

No abstract provided.


What Are The Limits Of Presidential Power?, John C. Yoo, Neil J. Kinkopf May 2015

What Are The Limits Of Presidential Power?, John C. Yoo, Neil J. Kinkopf

John C Yoo

No abstract provided.


Globalization And Structure, Julian Ku, John Yoo May 2015

Globalization And Structure, Julian Ku, John Yoo

John C Yoo

No abstract provided.


Clio At War: The Misuse Of History In The War Powers Debate, John C. Yoo May 2015

Clio At War: The Misuse Of History In The War Powers Debate, John C. Yoo

John C Yoo

No abstract provided.


Against Foreign Law, Robert J. Delahunty, John Yoo May 2015

Against Foreign Law, Robert J. Delahunty, John Yoo

John C Yoo

The article looks at the practice of several U.S. Supreme Court justices who have considered the decisions of foreign and international courts for guidance in interpreting the U.S. constitution. This practice has occurred in several controversial, high profile cases. There are two main reasons to think that use of foreign or international decisions extends beyond mere ornamentation.