Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Law & Religion (16)
- Arbitration (6)
- AT&T (1)
- Applicability (1)
- Arbitration agreement (1)
-
- Business (1)
- Class action (1)
- Common law (1)
- Concepcion (1)
- Consumer (1)
- Corporation (1)
- Discover Bank Rule (1)
- Dispute (1)
- Dispute Resolution (1)
- FAA (1)
- Federal Arbitration Act (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Invalidate (1)
- Jewish Law (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Revocation (1)
- Revoke (1)
- State courts (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Validity (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Speaker, “Religion’S Footnote Four: Church Autonomy As Arbitration”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Religion’S Footnote Four: Church Autonomy As Arbitration”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
No, Bloomberg Isn't Banning Circumcision, Michael Helfand
No, Bloomberg Isn't Banning Circumcision, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Religion’S Footnote Four: Church Autonomy As Arbitration”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Religion’S Footnote Four: Church Autonomy As Arbitration”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Church Autonomy And Religious Arbitration: Two Models Of Legal Pluralism”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Church Autonomy And Religious Arbitration: Two Models Of Legal Pluralism”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Postscript: Religious Boundaries, Michael Helfand
Postscript: Religious Boundaries, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Hebrew National Must Answer To A Higher Authority, Michael Helfand
Hebrew National Must Answer To A Higher Authority, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
The Boundaries Of Religious Freedom, Michael Helfand
The Boundaries Of Religious Freedom, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Church Autonomy And Religious Arbitration: Two Models Of Legal Pluralism”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Church Autonomy And Religious Arbitration: Two Models Of Legal Pluralism”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Taking Beth Din Judgments Into Secular Court”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Taking Beth Din Judgments Into Secular Court”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Speaker, “Litigating Religion”, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Purpose, Precedent, And Politics: Why Concepcion Covers Less Than You Think (Video), Michael Helfand
Purpose, Precedent, And Politics: Why Concepcion Covers Less Than You Think (Video), Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Symposium Introduction: The Competing Claims Of Law And Religion: Who Should Influence Whom?, Michael Helfand
Symposium Introduction: The Competing Claims Of Law And Religion: Who Should Influence Whom?, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
This introduction provides a preface to the Pepperdine Law Review symposium from the Third Annual Religious Legal Theory Conference on "The Competing Claims of Law & Religion: Who Should Influence Whom." As the introduction notes, the relationship between law and religion is both fraught with tension but also provides great opportunity. In so doing, the introduction sketches some of the varied responses to conflicts between law and religion, providing a brief overview of the papers included in the symposium issue.
Purpose, Precedent, And Politics: Why Concepcion Covers Less Than You Think, Michael A. Helfand
Purpose, Precedent, And Politics: Why Concepcion Covers Less Than You Think, Michael A. Helfand
Michael A Helfand
This article sketches some possible limitations on the impact AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion will have going forward. While many have seen the Supreme Court’s decision as simultaneously signaling an end to the viability of class action lawsuits and undermining principles of federalism, there may be reasons to believe that it will not have implications quite so far reaching. Specifically, this article proposes three reasons why Concepcion’s impact may be limited. First, the decision lends itself to a more narrow reading, which simply demands that courts take the entire of an arbitration agreement into account before deploying common law defenses to …