Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Mitigating Financial Risk For Small Business Entrepreneurs, Michelle M. Harner Dec 2011

Mitigating Financial Risk For Small Business Entrepreneurs, Michelle M. Harner

Michelle M. Harner

Financial distress by definition threatens a company’s viability. Entrepreneurial and start-up entities are particularly vulnerable to this threat. Yet, much of the discussion following the recent recession focuses almost exclusively on financial institutions and “too-big-to-fail” entities. This essay re-examines lessons gleaned from the recession in the context of smaller, entrepreneurial entities. Specifically, it analyzes how small business entrepreneurs might invoke principles of enterprise risk management to mitigate the long-term impact of financial distress on their business models. It also considers related refinements to extant small business regulations, including the U.S. bankruptcy laws. The essay’s primary objective is to help policymakers, …


Risk In Sentencing: Constitutionally-Suspect Variables And Evidence-Based Sentencing, James C. Oleson Mar 2011

Risk In Sentencing: Constitutionally-Suspect Variables And Evidence-Based Sentencing, James C. Oleson

James C Oleson

It is said that imposing punishment is one of the most difficult things a judge will ever do. Implicit in the imposition of punishment are a number of competing philosophical considerations: retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, and rehabilitation, among others. In many jurisdictions, judges enjoy broad authority over sentencing decisions; in others, judicial discretion is limited by mandatory-minimum penalties or sentencing guidelines. A new, actuarial approach to sentencing (“evidence-based sentencing”) focuses upon the reduction of recidivism, using data to maximize the utilitarian ends of sentencing. Research suggests that statistical assessments outperform clinical judgment of even trained experts. But which variables should judges …


The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act: What Caused The Financial Crisis And Will Dodd-Frank Succeed In Preventing Future Crises?, Charles W. Murdock Feb 2011

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act: What Caused The Financial Crisis And Will Dodd-Frank Succeed In Preventing Future Crises?, Charles W. Murdock

Charles W. Murdock

Summary: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: What Caused the Financial Crisis and Will Dodd-Frank Succeed in Preventing Future Crises?

We are still experiencing the devastating impact of the financial crisis which came to a head on September 18, 2008 when Secretary Paulson told Congressional leaders that “[u]nless you act, the financial system of this country and the world will melt down in a matter of days.”

To prevent future crises of this magnitude, last year Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. However, this year, legislation has already been introduced to repeal …


Creativity, Improvisation, And Risk: Copyright And Musical Innovation, Olufunmilayo B. Arewa Dec 2010

Creativity, Improvisation, And Risk: Copyright And Musical Innovation, Olufunmilayo B. Arewa

Olufunmilayo B. Arewa

The goals and beneficiaries of copyright frameworks have long been contested in varied contexts. Copyright is often treated as a policy tool that gives creators incentives to create new works. Incentive theories of copyright often emphasize appropriability, which enables copyright owners to ensure that they profit from their copyrighted works by exercising control over uses of, and access to, such works. Although copyright clearly imposes costs in the form of restrictions on access to copyright-protected works and inefficiencies in the form of deadweight loss, the benefits of copyright are thought by many to outweigh the costs. Copyright discussions may at …


Liability For Future Harm, Alex Stein, Porat Ariel Dec 2010

Liability For Future Harm, Alex Stein, Porat Ariel

Alex Stein

This Article considers the possibility of imposing liability in torts for a wrongfully created risk of future harm. We examine the American and English court decisions pertaining to this issue and consider whether a probability-based compensation for the victim’s expected—albeit not yet materialized—harm is just and efficient. We demonstrate how the virtues of a legal regime that allows a tort victim to recover compensation for her expected harm overshadow its vices. We conclude that a person’s risk of sustaining harm in the future should be actionable whenever the risk is substantial. We further conclude that it should be left to …