Law Commons^™

A State Law Approach To Preserving Fair Use In Academic Libraries, David R. Hansen

David R Hansen

Rethinking Commodification: Cases And Readings In Law And Culture, Martha Ertman, Joan Williams

Martha M. Ertman

What is the price of a limb? A child? Ethnicity? Love? In a world that is often ruled by buyers and sellers, those things that are often considered priceless become objects to be marketed and from which to earn a profit. Ranging from black market babies to exploitative sex trade operations to the marketing of race and culture, Rethinking Commodification presents an interdisciplinary collection of writings, including legal theory, case law, and original essays to reexamine the traditional legal question: ̶To commodify or not to commodify?” In this pathbreaking course reader, Martha M. Ertman and Joan C. Williams present the …

Investing In Distressed Italian Companies Under The Reformed Italian Bankruptcy Law - A Comparison With The Us Bankruptcy Code, Pierantonio Musso

Pierantonio Musso

This article presents a scheme to profitably invest in distressed Italian companies by taking advantage of the Italian Bankruptcy Law in comparison with the US Bankruptcy Code. The risks connected to the insolvency proceeding are analyzed under their economic effects and foreseen in their general appearance. Specific remedies to avoid or mitigate the potential risks are provided. Singular advantages, available only in the proposed investment scheme under the Italian Law, are described. As a result the investment produces a less risky and more profitable outcome than an investment in a non-distressed and non-Italian target company.

The Promise Principle And Contract Interpretation, Juliet P. Kostritsky

Juliet P Kostritsky

The promise principle and its roots in a certain type of morality of individual obligation, which play the central role in Charles Fried’s vision of Contract law, have importantly contributed to rescuing Contract law from absorption into Tort law and from the imposition of externally imposed standards that are collective in origin. It makes a mammoth contribution to alerting us to the tyranny of interference with individual self-determination. However, this essay questions whether a promise centered system derived from a moral philosophy of promising (without an observable and testable foundation in reality) and geared to internal individual obligation and duty …

Damages To Business Interests, R. Steven Thing

R. Steven Thing

No abstract provided.

A Pro-Congress Approach To Arbitration And Unconscionability, Stephen Friedman

Stephen E Friedman

This Essay endeavors to resolve a current controversy involving the application of the unconscionability doctrine to arbitration agreements. The pro-arbitration policies of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and the anti-arbitration instincts of the unconscionability doctrine are difficult to reconcile. Instead of clarity in this area of law, we have a series of hints and clues, often contradictory, from the Supreme Court. Although Professor David Horton and I share a desire to clarify this area of the law, we have nearly opposite views about how this should be accomplished. This Essay sets forth my position and also responds to Unconscionability Wars, …

Contract + Tort = Property: The Trade Secret Illustration, Matthew E. Cavanaugh Mba Cpa Esq.

Matthew E. Cavanaugh MBA CPA Esq.

This article commences with an introduction to the use of Hegel’s famous dialectical method as an arithmetic analysis of law. It reviews Hegel’s assertion that the sum of property and contract is tort and crime, and then suggests a better dialectic is that contract plus tort equals property. This article then reviews the doctrines of contract, tort, and property, focusing on the plaintiff’s rights and remedies, and who can be defendants in each of the three doctrines. The article next reviews the law of one particular type of intellectual property, trade secrets, because this article uses trade secrets as a …

Development Lending To Municipalities By The World Bank Group, Asheesh Bhalla

Asheesh Bhalla

The World Bank Group has recently shifted its development lending policies to have a greater focus on lending to municipalities and developing financial institutions and systems of market creation at the local level. The author reviews this policy shift, and the consequences of such policy changes on local government institutions and law.

The Hierarchy That Wasn't There: Elevating ‘Usage’ To Its Rightful Position For Contracts Governed By The Cisg, William P. Johnson

William P. Johnson

The term ‘usage’ generally refers to any practice that is habitual or customary within a given industry, trade or region. Under domestic U.S. sales law, the term ‘usage of trade’ is defined specifically to refer to any practice or method of dealing that has such regularity of observance as to justify an expectation that parties to a particular contract will observe the usage, even though the parties have not expressly incorporated the usage into their contract. Usage of trade can be used under domestic U.S. sales law to interpret, supplement or explain a written agreement. But usage of trade may …

Finding Room For Fairness In Formalism--The Sliding Scale Approach To Unconscionability, Melissa T. Lonegrass

Melissa T. Lonegrass

No abstract provided.

Is Privity Dead? Should It Be?, David F. Tavella

David F. Tavella

Privity, a concept that is over 150 years old, may have worked well in the 19th Century, seems outdated in a time national accounting firms and law firms. In the 19th and early 20th Centuries, when a person may have gone to an agent, accountant, or other service provider for advice, there was no thought that the advice would be distributed to potentially millions of people with the possibility of billions of dollars in losses for negligent performance. Today, this is common in the accounting and insurance industries. The question is whether a concept, even one firmly rooted in American …

Serious Flaw Of Employee Invention Ownership Under The Bayh-Dole Act In Stanford V. Roche: Finding The Missing Piece Of The Puzzle In The German Employee Invention Act, Toshiko Takenaka Prof.

Toshiko Takenaka Prof.

In Stanford v. Roche, the Supreme Court highlighted a serious flaw of employee invention ownership under the Bayh-Dole Act (BDA). This article argues that the current BDA is incomplete without a mechanism for contractors to secure the ownership of all federally funded inventions and proposes a revision to introduce such a mechanism from the German Employee Invention Act (EIA). Because the EIA influenced the drafting of the BDA, the EIA and BDA share key features, which make it easy for the BDA to adopt an ownership transfer mechanism from the EIA. This article also proposes to adopt a mechanism to …

Judicial Intervention As Risk Reduction, Juliet P. Kostritsky

Juliet P Kostritsky

JUDICIAL INTERVENTION AS RISK REDUCTION J. P. Kostritsky Employing an economics-based consequentialist approach to contract interpretation (focusing on the prospective effect and the factors that might justify intervention) this Article attempts to identify the precise parameters of an optimal framework for contract interpretation. Such a framework would seek to maximize gains from trade. The issue in such cases is always, given the words the parties used, what is the best (surplus maximizing) interpretation of the bargain. Courts can achieve that interpretation by, in part, minimizing the interpretive risk that parties face when they draft an express contract but fail to …

Rescission In Texas, A Suspect Remedy, George P. Roach

George P Roach

Rescission in Texas, A Suspect Remedy

Equitable remedies are sometimes overlooked even when favorable ex post changes in values or operating performance warrant their serious consideration. Due to liberalized standards for pleading and electing alternative remedies, rescission in Texas can provide a windfall to the claimant in comparison to standard monetary damages especially after favorable ex post changes. Texas courts are aware of the windfall incentive and can treat the claimant’s plea for rescission as suspect or opportunistic. Litigators on either side of a plea for rescission should consider how their case supports or refutes the suspicion that rescission would …

Social Media And The Rise In Consumer Bargaining Power, Wayne Barnes

Wayne Barnes

Consumers are constantly entering into form contracts, both offline and online. They do not read most of the terms, but the duty to read says the contracts are nevertheless fully enforceable. Moreover, consumers lack any real bargaining power when assenting to such contracts with merchants. Not only that, but if the products malfunctions, or they are somehow damaged by it, they will likely face the prospect of being limited in their available remedies because of boilerplate terms which are favorable to the merchant. In the “old days,” the consumer had no real recourse but to call a 1-800 number, and …

Social Media And The Rise In Consumer Bargaining Power, Wayne Barnes

Wayne Barnes

Consumers are constantly entering into form contracts, both offline and online. They do not read most of the terms, but the duty to read says the contracts are nevertheless fully enforceable. Moreover, consumers lack any real bargaining power when assenting to such contracts with merchants. Not only that, but if the products malfunctions, or they are somehow damaged by it, they will likely face the prospect of being limited in their available remedies because of boilerplate terms which are favorable to the merchant. In the “old days,” the consumer had no real recourse but to call a 1-800 number, and …

Social Media And The Rise In Consumer Bargaining Power, Wayne Barnes

Wayne Barnes

Consumers are constantly entering into form contracts, both offline and online. They do not read most of the terms, but the duty to read says the contracts are nevertheless fully enforceable. Moreover, consumers lack any real bargaining power when assenting to such contracts with merchants. Not only that, but if the products malfunctions, or they are somehow damaged by it, they will likely face the prospect of being limited in their available remedies because of boilerplate terms which are favorable to the merchant. In the “old days,” the consumer had no real recourse but to call a 1-800 number, and …

Social Media And The Rise In Consumer Bargaining Power, Wayne Barnes

Wayne Barnes

Consumers are constantly entering into form contracts, both offline and online. They do not read most of the terms, but the duty to read says the contracts are nevertheless fully enforceable. Moreover, consumers lack any real bargaining power when assenting to such contracts with merchants. Not only that, but if the products malfunctions, or they are somehow damaged by it, they will likely face the prospect of being limited in their available remedies because of boilerplate terms which are favorable to the merchant. In the “old days,” the consumer had no real recourse but to call a 1-800 number, and …

A Consequentialist Approach To Interpretation, Probabilistic Mechanisms, And Risk: Let’S Not Limit Courts’ Techniques Of Common Law Adjudication; Rethinking Judicial Intervention From Contracts To The Chrysler Bankruptcy, Juliet P. Kostritsky

Juliet P Kostritsky

Employing an economics-based consequentialist approach to contract interpretation (focusing on the prospective effect and the factors that might justify intervention) this Article attempts to identify the precise parameters of an optimal framework for contract interpretation. Such a framework would seek to maximize gains from trade. The issue in such cases is always, given the words the parties used, what is the best (surplus maximizing) interpretation of the bargain. Courts can achieve that interpretation by, in part, minimizing the interpretive risk that parties face when they draft an express contract but fail to completely resolve all possible issues. This Article uses …

Social Media And The Rise In Consumer Bargaining Power, Wayne R. Barnes

Wayne R. Barnes

The End Of Mortgage Securitization? Electronic Registration As A Threat To Bankruptcy Remotenes, John P. Hunt, Richard Stanton, Nancy Wallace

John P Hunt

A central tenet of asset securitization in the United States—that assets are bankruptcy remote from their sponsors—may be threatened by innovations in the transfer of mortgage loans from the loan-originators (sponsors) to the legal entities that own the mortgage pools (the Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs)). The major legal argument advanced in the paper is that because the mortgage is an interest in real property, the bankruptcy-remoteness rules applicable to real property, including § 544(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code, create a risk to the bankruptcy remoteness of mortgage transactions unless proper recording occurs. We review the traditional mortgage transfer process and …

Mixed Reality: How The Laws Of Virtual Worlds Govern Everyday Life, Joshua A.T. Fairfield

Joshua A.T. Fairfield

Just as the Internet linked human knowledge through the simple mechanism of the hyperlink, now reality itself is being hyperlinked, indexed, and augmented with virtual experiences. Imagine being able to check the background of your next date through your cell phone, or experience a hidden world of trolls and goblins while you are out strolling in the park. This is the exploding technology of Mixed Reality, which augments real places, people and things with rich virtual experiences. As virtual and real worlds converge, the law that governs virtual experiences will increasingly come to govern everyday life. The problem is that …

The Availability Of Takeover Defenses And Deal Protection Devices For Anglo-American Target Companies, Albert "Chip" Saulsbury Iv

Albert "Chip" Saulsbury IV

On July 21, 2011 the U.K.’s Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (the “Panel”) released amendments to the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the “Takeover Code”). These amendments, which take effect on September 19, 2011, will have a significant impact on the manner in which companies in the U.K. engage in mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) and will amplify the differences between British and American deal activity. Because of these amendments to the Takeover Code within the last month, the following Article, The Availability of Takeover Defenses and Deal Protection Devices for Anglo-American Target Companies, is especially timely and will provide …

Arbitration Agreements Used By Nursing Homes: An Empirical Study And Critique Of At&T Mobility V. Concepcion, Lisa Tripp

Lisa Tripp

Although the health care industry had historically been one of the fields that had not embraced pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements, that reluctance appears to be changing in at least one sector of the health care field. An examination of admission contracts used by North Carolina nursing homes and telephone survey of North Carolina nursing homes revealed that 43 percent of nursing homes now incorporate pre-dispute binding arbitration provisions into their admission contracts. All of the major nursing home chains operating in North Carolina use pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements in at least some of their facilities, while smaller operators use them …

Freedom Of Contract In An Augmented Reality: The Case Of Consumer Contracts, Scott Peppet

Scott Peppet

This Article argues that freedom of contract will take on different meaning in a world in which ubiquitous information about places, goods, people, firms and contract terms is available to contracting parties anywhere, any time. In particular, our increasingly “augmented reality” calls into question leading justifications for distrusting consumer contracts—and thereby strengthens traditional understandings of freedom of contract as enforcing contracts as written. This is largely a descriptive and predictive argument: the Article aims to introduce contract law to these technologies and consider their most likely effects. It certainly has normative implications, however. Given that the vast majority of consumer …

Rhetoric, Reality & The Wrongful Abrogation Of The Collateral Source Rule In Personal Injury Cases., Lori A. Roberts

Lori A Roberts

RHETORIC, REALITY & THE WRONGFUL ABROGATION OF THE COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES. LORI A. ROBERTS Abstract: There are few certainties in litigation, but one that any injured plaintiff with health care insurance can rely on is that a defendant-tortfeasor will argue that the plaintiff’s health care bills are “illusory” and that the plaintiff will recover a “windfall” if he is allowed to recover the full amount of those bills as economic damages. The issue addressed in this Article, whether the difference between the billed rate for medical care and the actual amount paid by a plaintiff’s insurer …

Selling Sex: Analyzing The Improper Use Defense To Contract Enforcement Through The Lens Of Carroll Versus Beardon, Julie M. Spanbauer

Julie M. Spanbauer

The 1963 decision of the Supreme Court of Montana in Carroll v. Beardon, occupies less than three full pages in the Pacific Reporter and involves a simple real estate transaction in which a “madam” sold a house used for prostitution to another “madam.” The opinion is the last in a long line of cases to speak specifically to the issue of enforcement of facially legitimate contracts that in some manner arguably involve or are related to prostitution and is commonly cited in treatises and hornbooks as representative of the movement by courts toward enforcement of such contracts under the law …

Testamentary Substitutes: Retained Interests, Custodial Accounts And Contractual Transactions—A New Approach, Sidney Kwestel, Rena C. Seplowitz

Rena C. Seplowitz

No abstract provided.

Testamentary Substitutes—A Time For Statutory Clarification, Sidney Kwestel, Rena Seplowitz

Rena C. Seplowitz

No abstract provided.

Huch V. Charter Communications Inc.: Consumer Prey, Corporate Predators And A Call For The Death Of The Voluntary Payment Doctrine Defense, Oliver T. Beatty

Oliver T Beatty

This article addresses the collision between consumer fraud statutes, which developed in the last forty years, and the voluntary payment doctrine, which dates back to the 1600’s. The voluntary payment doctrine (“VPD”) provides, in its most common form, that “absent fraud or duress, a person who pays with full knowledge of all the facts cannot recover the money back again.” This doctrine holds true even if the money is not legally owed, and in some cases, even if the payment is made under protest. Conversely, consumer fraud statutes typically allow consumers to recover damages in a broad range of contexts, …