Law Commons^™

From Nuclear War To Net War: Analogizing Cyber Attacks In International Law, Scott James Shackelford

Scott Shackelford

On April 27, 2007, Estonia was attacked by a computer network causing widespread damage. It is currently unclear what legal rights a state has as a victim of a cyber attack. Even if Estonia could conclusively prove that it was Russia, for example, behind the March 2007 attack, could it respond with force or its own cyber attack? There is a paucity of literature dealing with these questions, as well as the ethical, humanitarian, and human rights implications of information warfare (“IW”) on national and international security. Treatments of IW outside the orthodox international humanitarian law (“IHL”) framework are nearly …

Colombia’S Incursion Into Ecuadorian Territory: Justified Hot Pursuit Or Pugnacious Error?, Luz Estella Nagle

Luz Estella Nagle

On March 1, 2008, Colombian military forces launched a cross-border airstrike and ground operation into Ecuador to attack a jungle encampment occupied by high ranking members of the Colombian guerrilla army known as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). The specific target of the air attack was Luis Edgar Devia Silva, aka Raul Reyes, the FARC’s number two in command and one of Latin America’s longest enduring guerrilla leaders. Reyes and several cohorts were killed. The Colombian forces retrieved Reyes’ body and forensic evidence, including his laptop computer, and retreated back across the frontier, leaving the Ecuadorian military to …

Two Crises Of Confidence: Securing Non-Proliferation And The Rule Of Law Through Security Council Resolutions, Vik Kanwar

Vik Kanwar

This timely article describes the powers of the United Nations Security Council as they have developed in the field of non-proliferation, and demonstrated in recent resolutions, and goes on to propose a normative framework based on the model of reciprocal “confidence-building” measures to ensure the legality and legitimacy of these resolutions.

Recent proliferation crises (concerning Iran, North Korea, and non-state proliferation networks) have led the Council draw upon various sources-- express and implied powers under the UN Charter, powers granted by specific treaties, and an unusual degree of international consensus-- to expand its powers. This paper attempts to transcend false …

The Natural Right Of Self-Defense: Heller's Lesson For The World, David B. Kopel

David B Kopel

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller constitutionalized the right of self-defense, and described self-defense as a natural, inherent right. Analysis of natural law in Heller shows why Justice Stevens' dissent is clearly incorrect, and illuminates a crucial weakness in Justice Breyer's dissent. The constitutional recognition of the natural law right of self-defense has important implications for American law, and for foreign and international law.

The Rhetoric Of Self Defense, Janine Young Kim

Janine Kim

Might Does Not Make Right: The Flawed Effort To Redefine Jus Ad Bellum Proportionality, Kevin Nilsson

Kevin Nilsson

This Article argues that Israel’s use of force in self-defense in response to a 2006 Hezbollah cross-border raid was disproportionate and, therefore, unlawful under currently accepted interpretations of the international law governing the use of force. The Article continues by examining how Israeli actions during the 2006 Lebanon conflict as well as U.S. statements in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks have highlighted a concerted effort to redefine jus ad bellum proportionality. These efforts, although gaining some support in the form of simple game theory and the need for host-state assistance in the worldwide effort against terrorism, fail to …