Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Mobility Allowance And The Law, Mel Cousins Feb 2013

Mobility Allowance And The Law, Mel Cousins

Mel Cousins

The Irish government has recently announced the abolition of the mobility allowance and motorised transport grant. It appears that this decision was heavily influenced by the Government’s view that ‘the schemes are illegal in the context of the Equal Status Acts’. Although the reform options considered and legal advice received have not been specified, the impression has been created that reform would be very complex and that it would be impossible to reform the existing scheme to make it legally compliant without a major increase in its budget. This note discuses the legal issues concerning the operation of the mobility …


Equal Protection, Workers Compensation And Offset Of Benefits (Again) – Caldwell V Maco Workers Compensation And Caputo V Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania) Dec 2011

Equal Protection, Workers Compensation And Offset Of Benefits (Again) – Caldwell V Maco Workers Compensation And Caputo V Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania)

Mel Cousins

As noted in an earlier article, one issue which has received considerable attention in terms of equal protection challenges in US courts is that concerning the offset of one type of social security benefits with worker’s compensation payments. The Supreme Court in Richardson v Belcher upheld the reduction in social security disability insurance because of receipt of a state worker’s compensation payment as rationally based and free from invidious discrimination. The Court and various federal courts of appeals have subsequently shown little interest in subjecting such offset provisions to more than a minimal level of scrutiny. State courts have also …


Equal Protection, Workers Compensation And Offset Of Benefits – Merrill V Utah Labor Commission And Satterlee V Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Company, Mel Cousins Aug 2010

Equal Protection, Workers Compensation And Offset Of Benefits – Merrill V Utah Labor Commission And Satterlee V Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Company, Mel Cousins

Mel Cousins

One issue which has received considerable attention in terms of equal protection challenges in US courts is that concerning the offset of one type of social security benefits with another, with an occupational benefit, or the overlapping of various benefits with worker’s compensation payments. The Supreme Court in Richardson v Belcher upheld the reduction in social security disability insurance because of receipt of a state worker’s compensation payment as rationally based and free from invidious discrimination. The Court and various Federal courts of appeals have subsequently shown little interest in subjecting such offset provisions to more than a minimal level …


Human Rights, Anti-Discrimination And Social Security Benefits: Recent Uk Case Law, Mel Cousins Dec 2009

Human Rights, Anti-Discrimination And Social Security Benefits: Recent Uk Case Law, Mel Cousins

Mel Cousins

Since the adoption of the Human Rights Act 1998, challenges to UK social security law on the basis of the European Convention on Human Rights have become common - especially under the anti-discrimination provisions of Article 14. However, few of these challenges have been successful and, in general, the English courts have shown a poor understanding of the principles of human rights law. The recent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Stec (2005) 41 EHRR SE 295 and the House of Lords in RJM (2008) UKHL 63 have clarified important issues including the material scope of the …


Age Discrimination And Social Benefits: The Long Retreat From Tétreault-Gadoury?, Mel Cousins Dec 2008

Age Discrimination And Social Benefits: The Long Retreat From Tétreault-Gadoury?, Mel Cousins

Mel Cousins

This case note looks at a number of recent decisions of the Canadian courts concerning age discrimination as it applies to social benefits.