Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 13 of 13

Full-Text Articles in Law

Aligned Incentives: Envisioning Syzygy, Karl T. Muth Nov 2010

Aligned Incentives: Envisioning Syzygy, Karl T. Muth

Karl T Muth

In the wake of the failure of AIG, this paper deals with the question of whether incentive alignment is truly the problem with contemporary insurance products (as many in the media and the economics community have alleged) by examining two hypothetical types of insurance where incentives are extraordinarily well-aligned.


Is The Attorney-Client Privilege A Privilege Of The Rich? Federal Hmis Database Reporting And Homeless Client Confidentiality, Jennifer Hammitt Sep 2010

Is The Attorney-Client Privilege A Privilege Of The Rich? Federal Hmis Database Reporting And Homeless Client Confidentiality, Jennifer Hammitt

Jennifer Hammitt

The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) is a new database reporting system mandated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to track the usage of HUD services by homeless people. The HMIS requires collecting identifiable personal information about the individuals who use the services and entering that information into a database that enables information sharing and referral services. This comment arose out of an investigation into the HMIS database and confidentiality issues that I did while working at Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc., as part of the Homeless Legal Assistance Project in the summer of 2009. As this …


Reigning In Charities: Using An Intermediate Penalty To Enforce The Campaigning Prohibition, Samuel D. Brunson Aug 2010

Reigning In Charities: Using An Intermediate Penalty To Enforce The Campaigning Prohibition, Samuel D. Brunson

Samuel D. Brunson

Congress has prohibited public charities from campaigning for or against any candidate for office continuously since 1854. However, the IRS routinely fails to penalize public charities that accidentally violate or deliberately flout the prohibition. And the IRS’s reluctance is understandable: the penalty for violating the campaigning prohibition is loss of the public charity’s tax-exempt status, a death-knell for many public charities. This Article argues that the IRS’s underenforcement of the prohibition is predictable. The prohibition has provoked firestorms of debate among academics, policymakers, and directors of public charities themselves. Where the penalty for violating controversial laws is a hard shove, …


Memory And Punishment, Orlando Carter Snead Aug 2010

Memory And Punishment, Orlando Carter Snead

O. Carter Snead

This article is the first scholarly exploration of the implications of neurobiological memory modification for criminal law. Its point of entry is the fertile context of criminal punishment, in which memory plays a crucial role. Specifically, this article will argue that there is a deep relationship between memory and the foundational principles justifying how punishment should be distributed, including retributive justice, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, moral education, and restorative justice. For all such theoretical justifications, the questions of who and how much to punish is inextricably intertwined with how a crime is remembered — by the offender, by the sentencing authority, …


What Would Coase Do (About Parking Regulation)?, Michael E. Lewyn Aug 2010

What Would Coase Do (About Parking Regulation)?, Michael E. Lewyn

Michael E Lewyn

Like many government regulations, municipal minimum parking requirements exist to prevent externalities- most notably the congestion, pollution and greenhouse gas emissions that occur when motorists drive around a city searching for scarce parking. But because such regulations make parking (and thus driving) cheaper and make walking more difficult, such regulations may in fact increase driving, thus increasing congestion, pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.


"Censorship In The Video Game Industry: Government Intervention Or Parental Controls?", Richard J. Hunter Jr., Hector R. Lozada, Ann Mayo Jul 2010

"Censorship In The Video Game Industry: Government Intervention Or Parental Controls?", Richard J. Hunter Jr., Hector R. Lozada, Ann Mayo

Richard J Hunter Jr.

The article is a comprehensive review of the constitutional issues surrounding legislation which regulates the video game industry in the context of the Illinois Sexually Explicit Video Game Law (SEVGL). The article reviews the process of the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB), the application of strict scrutiny analysis by the Court of Appeals, the discussion relating to the constitutionality of the SEVGL, and revisits the important precedents found in Ginsberg and Miller. The article offers a suggestion for future legislative efforts in the area of regulation of this important industry.


Putting The Gene Back In The Bottle: Why California Needs Stronger Protection Of Genetic Privacy In The Wake Of Affordable Dna Testing, Farid Zakaria Jun 2010

Putting The Gene Back In The Bottle: Why California Needs Stronger Protection Of Genetic Privacy In The Wake Of Affordable Dna Testing, Farid Zakaria

Farid Zakaria

In recent years, many “direct-to-consumer” genetic testing companies have started offering a DNA analysis service to the public. Based on the analysis of the DNA contained in saliva, these companies are able to inform the customer about his or her likelihood of having certain traits and of developing a number of diseases. Given the sensitive nature of this kind of information, this paper considers whether it is sufficiently protected under the current legal and regulatory framework. Specifically, the paper studies whether current federal, state, and common law that protects medical and private information also guarantees the privacy of genetic information. …


Corporate Social Responsibility After Citizens United, David G. Yosifon Feb 2010

Corporate Social Responsibility After Citizens United, David G. Yosifon

David G. Yosifon

The Supreme Court recently held in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010) that the First Amendment forbids Congress from restricting the political speech of corporations. While corporate theory did very little to inform the Court’s thinking in Citizens United, this article argues that the holding in Citizens United requires us to rethink corporate theory. Specifically, this article demonstrates that the shareholder primacy norm in American corporate governance relies on the assumption that corporations can be restrained from influencing external governmental operations. We can enjoy the efficiencies generated by shareholder primacy, mainstream corporate theorists have long argued, because we can …


How Incentives Drove The Subprime Crisis, Charles W. Murdock Feb 2010

How Incentives Drove The Subprime Crisis, Charles W. Murdock

Charles W. Murdock

How Incentives Drove the Subprime Crisis

In order to address any systemic problem, whether the goal is to change the system, regulate the system, or change the incentives driving a system, it is necessary to appreciate all the drivers operating within the system. In the case of the subprime crisis, one of the drivers was the changing nature of the subprime loans, which was not factored into the models used by the investment bankers, the credit rating agencies, and the issuers of credit default swaps.

This paper is an attempt to look dispassionately at the subprime crisis from a particular …


The Roberts’S Supreme Court Takes A Sledge Hammer To Ashwander And Cautious Constitutional Jurisprudence: Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission, Allen E. Shoenberger Feb 2010

The Roberts’S Supreme Court Takes A Sledge Hammer To Ashwander And Cautious Constitutional Jurisprudence: Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission, Allen E. Shoenberger

Allen E Shoenberger

The methodology of the Supreme Court in its recent decision permitting unlimited corporate financing of election advertisements is more troubling that the specific holding. All signs of constitutional restraint are abandoned as the court employs a sledgehammer to smash Congresses attempt to eliminate the actuality and fear of corruption from electoral politics.


The Persistence Of Low Expectations In Special Education Law Viewed Through The Lens Of Therapeutic Jurisprduence, Richard Peterson Dec 2009

The Persistence Of Low Expectations In Special Education Law Viewed Through The Lens Of Therapeutic Jurisprduence, Richard Peterson

Richard Peterson

For more than thirty-five years a paradigm of low expectations has infected efforts to educate children with disabilities and has been a persistent and stubborn obstacle to the successful implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and its predecessor, the Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA). This dilemma raises questions addressed in this paper: What is meant by low expectations in the context of Special Education Law? What are the root causes of this phenomenon, and what makes it so resistant to change? How does it impede implementation of the IDEA? And lastly, in what ways does …


Fire With Fire: Heterodox Law & Economics, Karl T. Muth Dec 2009

Fire With Fire: Heterodox Law & Economics, Karl T. Muth

Karl T Muth

This Article first examines, from a historical perspective, the evolution of the law-and-economics movement. It then critically examines the application of economic principles the legal analysis, paying particular attention to how the political process has shaped the law-and-economics scholarship. Finally, it concludes that the principles of law-and-economics, while fundamentally sound, are often misapplied, too narrowly interpreted, and aggregated into a single viewpoint that is politically convenient rather than academically honest.


Memory And Punishment, Orlando Carter Snead Dec 2009

Memory And Punishment, Orlando Carter Snead

O. Carter Snead

This article is the first scholarly exploration of the implications of neurobiological memory modification for criminal law. Its point of entry is the fertile context of criminal punishment, in which memory plays a crucial role. Specifically, this article will argue that there is a deep relationship between memory and the foundational principles justifying how punishment should be distributed, including retributive justice, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, moral education, and restorative justice. For all such theoretical justifications, the questions of who and how much to punish are inextricably intertwined with how a crime is remembered — by the offender, by the sentencing authority, …