Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Selected Works

Constitutional Law

Aboriginal Rights

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Constitutional Dimensions Of Aboriginal Title, Brian Slattery Aug 2015

The Constitutional Dimensions Of Aboriginal Title, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

As the Supreme Court reaffirms in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia (2014), Aboriginal title is a sui generis right which cannot be described in traditional property terms. This paper argues that the explanation for this fact is that Aboriginal title is not a concept of private law. It is a concept of public law. It does not deal with the rights of private entities but with the rights and powers of constitutional entities that form part of the Canadian federation. If we look for analogies to Aboriginal title, we find a close parallel in Provincial title – the rights held …


The Aboriginal Constitution, Brian Slattery Jan 2014

The Aboriginal Constitution, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

In a remarkable series of cases over the past decade, from Haida Nation to Manitoba Métis Federation, the Supreme Court of Canada has thrown a strong light on three basic elements of Aboriginal law: the honour of the Crown, the Royal Proclamation of 1763, and Aboriginal Treaties. This paper argues that these form the framework of the Aboriginal Constitution, which parallels the Federal Pact between the Provinces in the Constitution Act, 1867. Indeed, the Aboriginal Constitution provides the Constitution of Canada with its most ancient and enduring roots.


The Metamorphosis Of Aboriginal Title, Brian Slattery Jan 2006

The Metamorphosis Of Aboriginal Title, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

Aboriginal title has undergone a significant transformation from the colonial era to the present day. In colonial times, aboriginal title was governed by Principles of Recognition based on ancient relations between the Crown and Indigenous American peoples. With the passage of time, this historical right has evolved into a generative right, governed by Principles of Reconciliation. As a generative right, aboriginal title exists in a dynamic but latent form, which is capable of partial articulation by the courts but whose full implementation requires agreement between the Indigenous party and the Crown. The courts have the power to recognize the core …


Aboriginal Rights And The Honour Of The Crown, Brian Slattery Jan 2005

Aboriginal Rights And The Honour Of The Crown, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

No abstract provided.


Making Sense Of Aboriginal And Treaty Rights, Brian Slattery Jan 2000

Making Sense Of Aboriginal And Treaty Rights, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

No abstract provided.


First Nations And The Constitution: A Question Of Trust, Brian Slattery Jan 1992

First Nations And The Constitution: A Question Of Trust, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

No abstract provided.


Understanding Aboriginal Rights, Brian Slattery Jan 1987

Understanding Aboriginal Rights, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

No abstract provided.


The Hidden Constitution: Aboriginal Rights In Canada, Brian Slattery Jan 1984

The Hidden Constitution: Aboriginal Rights In Canada, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

This article reviews the constitutional and historical grounds for Aboriginal and treaty rights in Canada and discusses the legal effects of entrenching these rights in the Constitution of Canada in 1982.


The Land Rights Of Indigenous Canadian Peoples, Brian Slattery Jan 1979

The Land Rights Of Indigenous Canadian Peoples, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

The problem examined in this work is whether the land rights originally held by Canada's Indigenous peoples survived the process whereby the British Crown acquired sovereignty over their territories, and, if so, in what form. The question, although historical in nature, has important implications for current disputes involving Aboriginal land claims in Canada. It is considered here largely as a matter of first impression. The author has examined the historical evidence with a fresh eye, in the light of contemporaneous legal authorities. Due consideration is given to modern case-law, but the primary focus is upon the historical process proper.