Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 16 of 16

Full-Text Articles in Law

Alaska’S Medical Malpractice Expert Advisory Panel: Assessing The Prognosis, Jonathan Scott Aronie Dec 1992

Alaska’S Medical Malpractice Expert Advisory Panel: Assessing The Prognosis, Jonathan Scott Aronie

Alaska Law Review

No abstract provided.


Evidence, Steven M. Pruitt, Steven E. Williford, Simpson Z. Fant Oct 1992

Evidence, Steven M. Pruitt, Steven E. Williford, Simpson Z. Fant

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.


In Support Of Huber, Jon F. Merz Jun 1992

In Support Of Huber, Jon F. Merz

RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)

The author takes exception to two recent reviews of GALILEO'S REVENGE.


The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried May 1992

The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Helpful Or Reasonably Reliable Analyzing The Expert Witness’S Methodology Under Federal Rules Of Evidence 702 And 703, Michael C. Mccarthy Jan 1992

Helpful Or Reasonably Reliable Analyzing The Expert Witness’S Methodology Under Federal Rules Of Evidence 702 And 703, Michael C. Mccarthy

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Trial By Jury Jan 1992

Trial By Jury

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr. Jan 1992

Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Searches And Seizure Jan 1992

Searches And Seizure

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Protective Sweep Incident To A Lawful Arrest: An Analysis Of Its Validity Under The Federal And New York State Constitution, Steven M. Fox Jan 1992

Protective Sweep Incident To A Lawful Arrest: An Analysis Of Its Validity Under The Federal And New York State Constitution, Steven M. Fox

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Searches And Seizure Jan 1992

Searches And Seizure

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Searches And Seizure Jan 1992

Searches And Seizure

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Searches And Seizure Jan 1992

Searches And Seizure

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Searches And Seizure Jan 1992

Searches And Seizure

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Rationalist Tradition At Trial, James L. Kainen Jan 1992

The Rationalist Tradition At Trial, James L. Kainen

Fordham Law Review

Analysis of Evidence: How to Do Things With Facts Based On Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof, By Terrence Anderson and William Twining (with an Appendix on Probablity and Proof by Philip Dawid). Little, Brown and Company, and London: George Weidenfeld and Nicolson, Ltd., 1991. Pp. 457. $22.00. (Teacher's Manual. Pp. 181)


The Admissibility Of Expert Testimony In Brainwashing-Related Cases - Should Witnesses Be Fryed?, Virginia M. Fournier Jan 1992

The Admissibility Of Expert Testimony In Brainwashing-Related Cases - Should Witnesses Be Fryed?, Virginia M. Fournier

Santa Clara Law Review

No abstract provided.


Criminal Procedure Trial: Amend Provisions Relating To Closed Circuit Television Testimony Of Child Victims Of Certain Sexual Offenses, Jill M. Wood Jan 1992

Criminal Procedure Trial: Amend Provisions Relating To Closed Circuit Television Testimony Of Child Victims Of Certain Sexual Offenses, Jill M. Wood

Georgia State University Law Review

The Act provides that a child victim of rape, sodomy, child molestation, cruelty to children, or sexual assault may testify out of court, and such testimony will be broadcast in the courtroom by way of closed circuit television. During testimony, only the judge, attorneys, camera operators, and a representative of the child may be in the room with the child. The Act does not prohibit the presence of both the child and the defendant in the courtroom at the same time for the purpose of identification.