Law Commons^™

Transnational Class Actions In The Shadow Of Preclusion, Zachary D. Clopton

Indiana Law Journal

The American class action is a procedural tool that advances substantive law values such as deterrence, compensation, and fairness. Opt-out class actions in particular achieve these goals by aggregating claims not only of active participants but also passive plaintiffs. Full faith and credit then extends the preclusive effect of class judgments to other U.S. courts. But there is no international full faith and credit obligation, and many foreign courts will not treat U.S. class judgments as binding on passive plaintiffs. Therefore, some plaintiffs may be able to wait until the U.S. class action is resolved before either joining the U.S. …

Scrutinizing Federal Electoral Qualifications, Derek T. Muller

Indiana Law Journal

Candidates for federal office must meet several constitutional qualifications. Sometimes, whether a candidate meets those qualifications is a matter of dispute. Courts and litigants often assume that a state has the power to include or exclude candidates from the ballot on the basis of the state’s own scrutiny of candidates’ qualifications. Courts and litigants also often assume that the matter is not left to the states but to Congress or another political actor. But those contradictory assumptions have never been examined, until now.

This Article compiles the mandates of the Constitution, the precedents of Congress, the practices of states administering …

Lawyer-Client Confidentiality: Rethinking The Trilemma, Monroe H. Freedman

Hofstra Law Review

The article discusses three ethical obligations which bear on attorney-client confidentiality in America in cases involving client perjury as of 2015, and it mentions how U.S. lawyers are required to learn as much as they can about their clients' cases, inform their clients of a lawyer's obligation to keep information confidential, and reveal confidential information to a court if an attorney knows that a client has committed perjury. The American Bar Association's ethical rules are examined.

The Curious Exclusion Of Corporations From The Privileges And Immunites Clause Of Article Iv, Stewart Jay

Hofstra Law Review

Since the mid-nineteenth century, courts consistently have held that corporations cannot be citizens for purposes of the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution. Judges reasoned that because corporations were not humans, they were unable to be “citizens” eligible for the clause’s protection against discriminatory treatment by states. Yet the Supreme Court also held that corporations were citizens for purposes of federal judicial jurisdiction, as well as “persons” under the Fourteenth Amendment. Extending these constitutional protections to corporations is based on the idea that businesses are owned by actual people who are harmed when their companies …

Interesting Times At The Federal Circuit, Kathleen M. O'Malley

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Speak Now Or Hold Your Peace: Prearbitration Express Waivers Of Evident-Partiality Challenges, Edward C. Dawson

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Families Now: What We Don't Know Is Hurting Us, Judith T. Younger

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't: Why Multi-Court-Involved Battered Mothers Just Can't Win, Margo Lindauer

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Litigant Consent: The Missing Link For Permissible Jurisdiction For Final Judgment In Non-Article Iii Courts After Stern V. Marshall, Jillian M. Clouse

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Litigating The Arab-Israeli Conflict In U.S. Courts: Critiquing The Lawfare Critique, Wiliam J. Aceves

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

The Gender Gap On The Federal Bench, Carl Tobias

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Hazards Of Proposals To Limit The Tenure Of Federal Judges And To Permit Judicial Removal Without Impeachment, William G. Ross

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mccain V. Grant Parish Police Jury: Judicial Use Of The Inherent Powers Doctrine To Compel Adequate Judicial Funding, André Doguet

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comment: Justice Potter Stewart's Philosophy Of Federal Judicial Administration, James A. Gazell

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federalism, Judicial Power And The "Arising Under" Jurisdiction Of The Federal Courts: A Hierarchical Analysis, Alan D. Hornstein

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

United States V. Payner--Constriction Of The Federal Courts' Supervisory Power, Mary Rich Lewis

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Commentary--Funding The Federal Judiciary, John M. Slack

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Essays From The Bench (Introduction), Eugene A. Wright

Indiana Law Journal

Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench

The Proposed National Court Of Appeals: A Threat To Judicial Symmetry, Luther M. Swygert

Indiana Law Journal

Symposium: Problems of the Federal Judiciary: A View from the Bench

Introduction: A View From The Bench, Jesse E. Eschbach

Indiana Law Journal

Symposium: Problems of the Federal Judiciary: A View from the Bench

Recent Proposals And Legislative Efforts To Limit Three-Judge Court Jurisdiction, Sidney B. Jacoby

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

What Has The Supreme Court Taught: A Criticism Of The Unites States Supreme Court By Way Of A Critique Of Lance V. The Board Of Education Of Roane County, James Audley Mclaughlin

West Virginia Law Review

The subway fare in New York City was recently raised to thirty cents. Incensed citizens immediately declared they would go to court and have the increase declared unconstitutional. "Unconstitutional" and "constitutional rights" have become the watchwords of political protestors and reformers. Moreover, their political forum is often a court of law. Who taught the nation this rhetoric, this mode of action, and this attitude toward law, law reform, and politics? The Supreme Court of the United States. Has the Court deliberately taught this doctrine? No, nor is it apparently even conscious of what it has unwittingly done. It is important …

The Supreme Court And Political Question: Affirmation Or Abdication?, Ralph J. Bean Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The High Court: Final...But Fallible, Ovid C. Lewis

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Separation Of Powers: The Phenomenon Of Legislative Courts, Edwin H. Greenebaum, W. Willard Wirtz

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Federal Courts - Change Of Venue Under Section 1404(A) - Consideration Of Applicable Substantive Law "In The Interest Of Justice", Richard B. Wilkins

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Policy And Procedure In Abstention: Is The Pullman Technique Proper?

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Domestic Courts In The International Legal Order, Richard A. Falk

Indiana Law Journal

Symposium: Procedural Aspects of International Law

The Marshall Court: Nationalization Of Private Rights And Personal Liberty From The Authority Of The Commerce Clause, W. Howard Mann

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Major Labor Decisions Of The Supreme Court Of The United States 1960 Term, Donald H. Wollett

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.