Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (59)
- State and Local Government Law (53)
- Courts (20)
- Judges (15)
- Fourth Amendment (14)
-
- Criminal Law (11)
- Fourteenth Amendment (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Law and Society (7)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Supreme Court of the United States (6)
- Legal History (5)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (5)
- Evidence (4)
- Property Law and Real Estate (4)
- Rule of Law (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Law and Psychology (3)
- Other Law (3)
- Social Welfare Law (3)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Disability Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Institution
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 30 of 84
Full-Text Articles in Law
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Endrew F. Clairvoyance, Mark C. Weber
Some Reflections On Dissenting, Kermit V. Lipez
Some Reflections On Dissenting, Kermit V. Lipez
Maine Law Review
In the collegial world of appellate judging, where the dominant impulse is consensus, dissents depart from the norm. If their language is sharp, the dissents may offend colleagues and worry court watchers who expect consensus. These self-assigned opinions also add to the pressures of the work. Given these implications, the choice to dissent should never be a casual one. You must weigh the institutional and personal costs and benefits, understand the purpose of the dissent and the audiences for it, and always be attentive to style and tone. In a haphazard sort of way, I consider these issues when I …
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judge Levine: A Survey Of His Most Influential Court Of Appeals Decisions - 1993-2002, Jean D'Alessandro
Judge Levine: A Survey Of His Most Influential Court Of Appeals Decisions - 1993-2002, Jean D'Alessandro
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Wright, Melanie Hendry
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Wright, Melanie Hendry
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Typology Of Judging Styles, Corey Rayburn Yung
A Typology Of Judging Styles, Corey Rayburn Yung
Northwestern University Law Review
This Article calls into question the fundamental premises of models of judicial decisionmaking utilized by legal and political science scholars. In the place of the predominant theories, I offer a new approach to understanding judicial behavior which recognizes judicial heterogeneity, multidimensional behavior, and interconnectedness among judges at different levels within the judiciary. The study utilizes a unique dataset of over 30,000 judicial votes from eleven courts of appeals in 2008, yielding statistically independent measures for judicial activism, ideology, independence, and partisanship. Based upon those four metrics, statistical cluster analysis is used to identify nine statistically distinct judging styles: Trailblazing, Consensus …
Swing And A Miss: The Missouri Court Of Appeals Attempts To Interpret Delaware Corporation Law. Hci Investors, Llc V. Fox, David Ferguson
Swing And A Miss: The Missouri Court Of Appeals Attempts To Interpret Delaware Corporation Law. Hci Investors, Llc V. Fox, David Ferguson
Missouri Law Review
This Note examines the court’s analysis in implicitly adopting this new interpretation of the duties of corporate fiduciaries under the entire fairness standard and argues that by essentially ignoring the dichotomy between the standards and misapplying the relevant case law, HCI Investors was improperly decided. Part II examines the background of the underlying transaction at issue in the case, the parties’ arguments, the lower court’s disposition, the appellants’ arguments on appeal, and the appellate court’s disposition. Part III gives some legal background for the issues at play, including the adoption of Delaware’s corporation law by the Kansas courts generally and …
Shield Law - The Qualified Privilege Of Newscasters & Journalists In Non-Confidential News - Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Combest, 828 N.E.2d 583 (N.Y. 2005), Albert V. Messina Jr.
Shield Law - The Qualified Privilege Of Newscasters & Journalists In Non-Confidential News - Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Combest, 828 N.E.2d 583 (N.Y. 2005), Albert V. Messina Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Consumers Union Of United States, Inc. V. New York, Daphne Vlcek
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Consumers Union Of United States, Inc. V. New York, Daphne Vlcek
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lower Court Compliance With Supreme Court Remands, Elise Borochoff
Lower Court Compliance With Supreme Court Remands, Elise Borochoff
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confronting The Confrontation Clause: Addressing The Unanswered Question Of Whether Autopsy Reports Are Testimonial Evidence - People V. Hall, Bailey Ince
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Promoting The Progress: Three Decades Of Patent Jurisprudence In The Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit, Damon C. Andrews
Promoting The Progress: Three Decades Of Patent Jurisprudence In The Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit, Damon C. Andrews
Missouri Law Review
In the nearly thirty years since the Federal Circuit's first published decision, the court has decided numerous cases that have produced a rich patent jurisprudence. This Article seeks to evaluate that jurisprudence from several perspectives. Part II summarizes the Federal Circuit's patent history in terms of the court's judges, the external factors that have shaped its patent jurisprudence, and the overall success of the court in light of Congress's intent. Part III then evaluates the Federal Circuit's general stance on whether to uphold the PTO's grant or denial of a patent, or a district court's decision to invalidate a patent, …
Forward: Symposium On Evolving The Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit And Its Patent Law Jurisprudence, Dennis D. Crouch
Forward: Symposium On Evolving The Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit And Its Patent Law Jurisprudence, Dennis D. Crouch
Missouri Law Review
As I discuss below, conditions on the ground have changed in the few short months following the Symposium. Congress has now acted, and the Patent Office will soon have additional authority. These changes play directly into the arguments of our Symposium authors and make their results even more important.
Differentiating The Federal Circuit, Elizabeth I. Winston
Differentiating The Federal Circuit, Elizabeth I. Winston
Missouri Law Review
In 1982, Congress created the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Often referred to as an experiment, the Federal Circuit has flourished Born again from the ashes of its predecessors, the aptly nicknamed Phoenix Court continues to grow in significance, stature, and strength. As it grows, however, the court remains rooted in its history and in its unique nature. This Article explores the Federal Circuit's structure and its impact on the development of Federal Circuit jurisprudence. The Federal Circuit is distinguishable by more than its national jurisdiction - the very essence of the court sets it apart …
Distinguishing Judges: An Empirical Ranking Of Judicial Quality In The United States Court Of Appeals, Robert Anderson
Distinguishing Judges: An Empirical Ranking Of Judicial Quality In The United States Court Of Appeals, Robert Anderson
Missouri Law Review
This Article presents an empirical performance ranking of 383 federal appellate judges who served on the United States Courts of Appeals between 1960 and 2008. Like existing judge evaluation studies, this Article uses citations from judicial opinions to assess judicial quality. Unlike existing citation studies, which treat positive and negative citations alike, this Article ranks judges according to the mix of positive and negative citations to the opinions, rather than the number of citations to those opinions. By distinguishing between positive and negative citations, this approach avoids ranking judges higher for citations even when the judges are being cited negatively. …
A Sea Change In The Appellate Process?, Gerald W. Vandewalle
A Sea Change In The Appellate Process?, Gerald W. Vandewalle
Seattle University Law Review
Professor David Wexler's essay is certain to engender a sense of fear in appellate judges by its very suggestion that we should undertake such a sweeping reform of the appellate process. But the suggestions should-and will-beget the gnawing feeling that Professor Wexler's analysis of the articles by Professors Nathalie Des Rosiers and Amy Ronner, as well as the questions he poses, require us to explore these ideas further. For those of us who follow the "no advisory opinions" we might stop there. For thotshee acpapneolnl aotef courts who use a screening process to divert cases to an alternative dispute resolution …
The Secret Of The Court In The Netherlands, Niels F. Van Manen
The Secret Of The Court In The Netherlands, Niels F. Van Manen
Seattle University Law Review
The procedural organization of the legal system in the Netherlands is quite different from the North American model. The Dutch legal system forbids the publication of dissenting opinions. There is even a veil of ignorance about unanimity, created by what is "secret of the court": justice is handed out in black and white terms, regardless of the judges' motivations. This might create an image of unity and unanimity, and thus promote the legitimacy of jurisprudence, however, this secret of the court also prevents the effects of therapeutic jurisprudence, since those who have "won," but even more so those who have …
Therapeutic Jurisprudence And The Appellate Courts: Possibilities, Linda M. Mcgee
Therapeutic Jurisprudence And The Appellate Courts: Possibilities, Linda M. Mcgee
Seattle University Law Review
Therapeutic jurisprudence has multiple possibilities, provided it does not add another layer of cost, delay, and time to the process. First, we should see "a reduced number of cases for the appellate court to decide, fewer remands and secondary appeals, the streamlining of appeals through partial resolution of issues, the satisfaction of parties' underlying needs and interests, and the reduction of the time a case spends on appeal." Second, the outcome does not have to become part of the case law that applies to similar cases, possibly establishing negative precedent. Third, mediation allows personal healing and the development of positive, …
Interactive Judicial Federalism: Certified Questions In New York, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth I. Weissman
Interactive Judicial Federalism: Certified Questions In New York, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth I. Weissman
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions, Lisa Hill
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions, Lisa Hill
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy, Court Of Appeals: People V. Latham
Double Jeopardy, Court Of Appeals: People V. Latham
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy, Court Of Appeals: People V. Vasquez
Double Jeopardy, Court Of Appeals: People V. Vasquez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection, Court Of Appeals: Trustees Of Union College V. Schenectady City Council
Equal Protection, Court Of Appeals: Trustees Of Union College V. Schenectady City Council
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: Daxor Corporation V. New York State Department Of Health
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: Daxor Corporation V. New York State Department Of Health
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: People V. Thompson
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: People V. Thompson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.