Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Affirmative action (1)
- Anonymous reporting (1)
- Bakke (1)
- CPS (1)
- Child abuse (1)
-
- Child abuse hotlines (1)
- Child neglect (1)
- Child protective services (1)
- Class-based (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Domestic relations (1)
- Fisher (1)
- Fisher v. University of Texas (1)
- Gratz (1)
- Gratz v. Bollinger (1)
- Grutter (1)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (1)
- Higher education (1)
- Hopwood (1)
- Juveniles (1)
- Legacy (1)
- Mandatory reporting (1)
- Narrow tailoring (1)
- Narrowly tailored (1)
- Parents (1)
- Percentage plan (1)
- Procedural due process (1)
- Race (1)
- Race-based (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Following Fisher: Narrowly Tailoring Affirmative Action, Eang L. Ngov
Following Fisher: Narrowly Tailoring Affirmative Action, Eang L. Ngov
Catholic University Law Review
Affirmative action has been at the forefront of educational policies and to this day continues to enliven debates. For decades, schools have litigated over whether affirmative action can be used to create a diverse student body. Now, the litigation has shifted to whether affirmative action policies are narrowly tailored. The Supreme Court’s most recent affirmative action case, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, requires that schools prove that there are no workable race neutral alternatives in order to demonstrate that their affirmative action programs are narrowly tailored. This article examines the available race neutral alternatives: percentage plans; socioeconomic …
Abolish Anonymous Reporting To Child Abuse Hotlines, Dale Margolin Cecka
Abolish Anonymous Reporting To Child Abuse Hotlines, Dale Margolin Cecka
Catholic University Law Review
All states allow the public to anonymously report suspicions of child abuse or neglect to a toll free central phone number. An extensive examination of the policy and practices behind anonymous reporting hotlines indicates that they are widely unregulated and susceptible to abuse. The possible repercussions of an anonymous phone call create costs to the family and society which do not outweigh the potential benefit of allowing anonymous public reports. Under the guise of protecting children, the law has developed in such a way that it infringes on the fundamental rights of parents and children. At the same time, anonymous …