Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 11 of 11

Full-Text Articles in Law

Criminal Court Of New York, City Of New York: People V. Larsen, Benjamin Fox Tracy Oct 2011

Criminal Court Of New York, City Of New York: People V. Larsen, Benjamin Fox Tracy

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Felony Animal Cruelty Laws In New York, Stephen Iannacone Jul 2011

Felony Animal Cruelty Laws In New York, Stephen Iannacone

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.


No Dwelling Left Behind: Expanding New York’S Uniform Housing Statutes To Single And Two-Family Dwellings, Daniel R. Shortt Jul 2011

No Dwelling Left Behind: Expanding New York’S Uniform Housing Statutes To Single And Two-Family Dwellings, Daniel R. Shortt

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.


Actual Innocence After Friedman V. Rehal: The Second Circuit Pursues A New Mechanism For Seeking Justice In Actual Innocence Cases, Jonathan M. Kirshbaum Jul 2011

Actual Innocence After Friedman V. Rehal: The Second Circuit Pursues A New Mechanism For Seeking Justice In Actual Innocence Cases, Jonathan M. Kirshbaum

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.


An Illusory Right To Appeal: Substantial Constitutional Questions At The New York Court Of Appeals, Meredith R. Miller Jul 2011

An Illusory Right To Appeal: Substantial Constitutional Questions At The New York Court Of Appeals, Meredith R. Miller

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.


Prison Ain’T Hell: An Interview With The Son Of Sam—David Berkowitz, And Why State-Funded Faith-Based Prison Rehabilitation Programs Do Not Violate The Establishment Clause, Rebekah Binger Mar 2011

Prison Ain’T Hell: An Interview With The Son Of Sam—David Berkowitz, And Why State-Funded Faith-Based Prison Rehabilitation Programs Do Not Violate The Establishment Clause, Rebekah Binger

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.


"Screening” New York’S New Rules—Laterals Remain Conflicted Out, Fallyn B. Reichert Mar 2011

"Screening” New York’S New Rules—Laterals Remain Conflicted Out, Fallyn B. Reichert

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.


Gallenthin V. Kaur: A Comparative Analysis Of How The New Jersey And New York Courts Approach Judicial Review Of The Exercise Of Eminent Domain For Redevelopment, Ronald K. Chen Jan 2011

Gallenthin V. Kaur: A Comparative Analysis Of How The New Jersey And New York Courts Approach Judicial Review Of The Exercise Of Eminent Domain For Redevelopment, Ronald K. Chen

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Article explores two explanations for why New Jersey and New York take different approaches to judicial review of exercises of eminent domain. Part I examines the approach of both states and their differing procedures for review of administrative agency determinations. Part II discusses how each states' courts and legislatures define "blight." Part III examines how New York's approach leaves municipal officials and redevelopers free to use the more flexible concept of "underutilization" as a proxy for "blight."


The Use And Abuse Of Blight In Eminent Domain, Martin E. Gold, Lynne B. Sagalyn Jan 2011

The Use And Abuse Of Blight In Eminent Domain, Martin E. Gold, Lynne B. Sagalyn

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Article examines the term "blight" and how it is used in eminent domain cases. Part I discusses the development of the term and how various states define it. Part II lays out a hierarchy which may be used to compare the private benefits on one hand and the public benefits on the other hand in redevelopment projects. In Part III, the Columbia University expansion in Manhattanville is examined, at both the New York Appellate Division and Court of Appeals levels. Part IV discusses how forty-three states redefined blight after the Kelo case. Part V discusses how political and business …


Condemning The Decisions Of The Past: Eminent Domain And Democratic Accountability, Christopher Serkin Jan 2011

Condemning The Decisions Of The Past: Eminent Domain And Democratic Accountability, Christopher Serkin

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Essay argues that there is a seldom-recognized purpose to eminent domain: preserving the ability of elected representatives to respond to the will of the people. The author proposes that eminent domain allows government to depart from the policy choices of administrations which came before and is therefore a tool for acquiring "democratic legitimacy." He explores this theory by examining examples such as breaking up the adult use zones in Times Square and reclaiming New York's waterfront, which had been essentially cut off by highways.


Let There Be Blight: Blight Condemnations In New York After Goldstein And Kaur, Ilya Somin Jan 2011

Let There Be Blight: Blight Condemnations In New York After Goldstein And Kaur, Ilya Somin

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Article analyzes the New York cases of Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp. and Goldstein v. New York State Urban Development Corp. and asserts that the New York Court of Appeals erred in allowing such an expansive definition of "blight" and defining pretextual takings too narrowly. Part I Describes the two cases. Part II explains the concept of blight condemnation and how it was used in the two cases. Part III discusses how the two cases treat the federal constitutional standard for pretextual takings. The Article concludes that eminent domain reform requires a narrower definition of "blight" …