Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (30)
- State and Local Government Law (27)
- Criminal Procedure (16)
- Legislation (10)
- Fourth Amendment (7)
-
- Criminal Law (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Civil Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Construction Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Retirement Security Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Taxation-State and Local (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 37
Full-Text Articles in Law
Overcoming Overbreadth: Facial Challenges And The Valid Rule Requirement , Marc E. Isserles
Overcoming Overbreadth: Facial Challenges And The Valid Rule Requirement , Marc E. Isserles
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Course Of Law Cannot Be Stopped': The Aftermath Of The Cumberland Rebellion In The Civil Courts Of Nova Scotia, Jim Phillips, Ernest A. Clarke
The Course Of Law Cannot Be Stopped': The Aftermath Of The Cumberland Rebellion In The Civil Courts Of Nova Scotia, Jim Phillips, Ernest A. Clarke
Dalhousie Law Journal
This article examines a series of cases launched in the Nova Scotia courts following the Cumberland Rebellion of 1776. In these cases loyalists sued former rebels, including those granted amnesty by the authorities, for losses sustained during the rebellion. The article traces the history of the cases and places them in the context of post-rebellion government policy. It argues that such proceedings were without precedent and effectively took the place of official schemes of expropriation of rebel land and compensation to loyalists. It also suggests that the use of civil courts in this way prolonged and exacerbated the social and …
Constitutional Law: A Ruse For Government By An Intellectual Elite, Lino A. Graglia
Constitutional Law: A Ruse For Government By An Intellectual Elite, Lino A. Graglia
Georgia State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Irreconcilable Principles: Law, Politics, And The Illinois Supreme Court, Jackson Williams
Irreconcilable Principles: Law, Politics, And The Illinois Supreme Court, Jackson Williams
Northern Illinois University Law Review
This article attempts to evaluate the recent criticisms of the political structure of the Illinois Supreme Court. The author examines the electoral and legal systems that usually come into potential conflicts. The goal of the article is to illustrate some important issues in the environment free from the sensationalism of press accounts and the emotionalism of political attacks, and provoke a sensible debate among the State's bar, legislators, and public about how the perception of a "political" court impacts on Illinois' legal system.
Maintaining An Accusatorial System Of Justice: The States' Refusal To Follow The Supreme Court's Sanctioning Of Official Police Deception In Moran V. Burbine, John F. Terzano
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Ours is the accusatorial as opposed to the inquisitorial system. Such has been the characteristic of Anglo-American criminal justice since it freed itself from practices borrowed by the Star Chamber from the Continent whereby an accused was interrogated in secret for hours on end. Under our system society carries the burden of proving its charge against the accused not out of his own mouth. It must establish its case, not by interrogation of the accused even under judicial safeguards, but by evidence independently secured through skillful investigation.... Protracted, systematic and uncontrolled subjection of an accused to interrogation by the police …
Contracts Clause, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Department: B.O.C.E.S. For Sole Supervisory District Of Rockland County V. State Of New York
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Brewer
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Brewer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: In Re Gladys H.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: In Re Gladys H.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Suffolk County: People V. Shulman
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Suffolk County: People V. Shulman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Separation Of Powers, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Dorst V. Pataki
Separation Of Powers, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Dorst V. Pataki
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commerce Clause, First Department: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company V. City Of New York Department Of Finance
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ex Post Facto Laws, Supreme Court, Dutchess County: Doe V. Division Of Probation And Correction Alternatives
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Speech, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Macfarlane V. Village Of Scotia
Free Speech, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Macfarlane V. Village Of Scotia
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Speech, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Urbach V. Farrell
Free Speech, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Urbach V. Farrell
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Leslie
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Leslie
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: People V. Gabriel
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: People V. Gabriel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: People V. Himko
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: People V. Himko
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Bell
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Bell
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To A Speedy Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Coplin
Right To A Speedy Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Coplin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County: People V. Johnson
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County: People V. Johnson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: Prudential Securities Incorporated V. Brigianos
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department: People V. Hall
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department: People V. Hall
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Bronx County: Seabrook V. Johnson
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Bronx County: Seabrook V. Johnson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Dutchess County: People V. Mcintosh
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Dutchess County: People V. Mcintosh
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Smith
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Smith
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Admissibility Of Medical Testimony In Ohio: Daubert, Joiner And Ohio's Relevance-Reliability Standard, Gerald J. Todaro
The Admissibility Of Medical Testimony In Ohio: Daubert, Joiner And Ohio's Relevance-Reliability Standard, Gerald J. Todaro
Cleveland State Law Review
This article specifically examines the reliability standard imposed under Rule 702 of the Ohio Rules of Evidence and its application to medical expert testimony in Ohio. Section II reviews Daubert, its progeny, and Ohio law. This analysis reveals tension between Ohio's flexible relevance/reliability standard and the more exacting demands of Daubert. Section III examines the scientific basis of clinical diagnosis and treatment of illness and disease. This section argues that judges should take judicial notice of the conventional methodology underlying the clinical practice of medicine, and thus the preliminary question of reliability of medical expert testimony should rarely require a …
Does New York's Death Penalty Statute Violate The New York Constitution?, Honorable Stewart F. Hancock Jr., Christopher Quinn, Richard Klein
Does New York's Death Penalty Statute Violate The New York Constitution?, Honorable Stewart F. Hancock Jr., Christopher Quinn, Richard Klein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.