Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Taxation - Federal Income Tax-What Constitutes Accident Or Health Insurance Under Section 22(B)(5)-, Marvin O. Young
Taxation - Federal Income Tax-What Constitutes Accident Or Health Insurance Under Section 22(B)(5)-, Marvin O. Young
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought this action to recover federal income tax paid by him for the year 1945 on a sum of $1800 which plaintiff received from his employer pursuant to a "free" sickness benefits plan which plaintiff's employer had in effect, claiming that this amount was excludable from gross income under section 22(b)(5) as "amounts received through accident or health insurance." Plaintiff's employer was an insurance company with authority to write health and accident insurance, and "free" protection was given to all full-time salaried home and branch office employees who could pass a satisfactory medical examination. Many ordinary features of a …
Evidence-Admissibility Of Expressions Of Pain And Suffering, Edgar A. Strause S.Ed
Evidence-Admissibility Of Expressions Of Pain And Suffering, Edgar A. Strause S.Ed
Michigan Law Review
Notwithstanding medical achievements, the human being has not yet been immunized from physical injury and the pain customarily attending such injury. This fact coupled with the ill-controlled fury of modem life has led to an enormous amount of personal injury litigation. Such litigation, with rare exceptions, presents an evidentiary feature of pain and suffering of the victim. Most often the problem arises where pain and suffering are an element of the damages, although it may likewise be involved in showing the nature or the extent of the physical injury.
Negligence-Federal Employer's Liability Act-Extension Of The Safe Place To Work Doctrine, Charles E. Oldfather S.Ed.
Negligence-Federal Employer's Liability Act-Extension Of The Safe Place To Work Doctrine, Charles E. Oldfather S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a lumber inspector employed by the defendant railroad, was inspecting railroad ties on a dock owned by an independent lumber company. The employees of the lumber company had piled the ties so that the ends were either flush with or protruded over the edge of the dock. In order to inspect the ends, the plaintiff assumed a ''bent-over" position in which his right foot was on the edge of the dock, his left hand on the pile and his left foot suspended in the air. After losing his balance, he placed his left foot on the dock where it …
Admiralty-Unseaworthiness Of Vessel In Having Vicious Crew Member Aboard, Richard B. Barnett S.Ed.
Admiralty-Unseaworthiness Of Vessel In Having Vicious Crew Member Aboard, Richard B. Barnett S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a seaman on board defendant's ship, went ashore on leave with the second cook. After returning to the ship, the two quarrelled and plaintiff knocked the cook down. The cook went to the galley and obtained a meat cleaver with which he struck plaintiff on the head, causing serious injury. Plaintiff brought suit against the ship owner for damages on the theory that in allowing a man of the cook's vicious proclivities to become a member of the crew, defendant failed to provide a "seaworthy" ship and that plaintiff had suffered injury as a result. Plaintiff appealed a verdict …