Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Journal

1937

University of Washington School of Law

Court-packing proposal

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

The American Bar And The Supreme Court Proposal, F. H. Stinchfield Apr 1937

The American Bar And The Supreme Court Proposal, F. H. Stinchfield

Washington Law Review

The issue regarded most seriously was, of course, the proposed increase of the Supreme Court, and, a bit more incidentally, the changes of the lower Federal Courts. Against such an increase the American Bar Association was emphatic. Thirteen out of every fifteen members said no such result can be permitted. This issue is the only one which gets much attention from the public. However serious the other considerations may be, the lay citizens of the United States can think only of the necessity of protection to their Supreme Court. Our influence in this situation must of necessity be great. Whatever …


What Lawyers Think Of The President's Court Proposal, Anon Apr 1937

What Lawyers Think Of The President's Court Proposal, Anon

Washington Law Review

The American Bar Association has announced that in every one of the forty-eight States and the District of Columbia, the members of the Association participating in its recent poll voted disapproval of an increase in the number of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States on the basis recommended by the President of the United States in his message of February 5, 1937. Members of the Association throughout the United States voted by secret ballot by mail, upon the various proposals affecting the Federal Judiciary, four of which were approved by a majority of the members voting; but …