Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Cooper v. Aaron; American federalism; civil rights; federal-state relationships; New York v. United States (1992); Printz v. United States (1996); judicial supremacy; types of federalism; federal commandeering; separation of powers; (2)
- Cooper v. Aaron; judicial supremacy; American Federalism; Little Rock school desegregation; racial integration; US Supreme Court; SCOTUS; rule of law; (2)
- Cooper v. Aaron; judicial supremacy; Little Rock school desegregation; Supreme Court and minority rights; judicial activism; right to contract; American federalism; US Supreme Court; rule of law; rule of the Supreme Court; (2)
- Cooper v. Aaron; judicial supremacy; Little Rock school desegregation; racial integration; US Supreme Court; SCOTUS; Southern Manifesto; rule of law; rule of the Supreme Court; judicial supremacy politics; (2)
- Cooper v. Aaron; republican constitution; constitutional change; Article II; Article IV; constitutional violence; domestic constitutional violence legislation; Duncan v. Kirby; Jackson v. Kuhn; Militia Acts of 1792 and 1795; Insurrection Act of 1807 (2)
-
- "accommodation vision" of religion (1)
- "separation vision" of religion (1)
- 138 S. Ct. 356; definition of "mobile interception device"; limitations on electronic surveillance; Title III; “core concerns” test; congressional interpretation of Title III; regulate electronic eavesdropping by government officials; wiretap authorization order; Title III suppression remedy; Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (1)
- 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2521. (1)
- 2017 Ark. 76; habeas corpus actions; Rule 37; limiting scope of review in Rule 37 postconviction actions; litigating ineffective assistance claims; Barnes footnote; (1)
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association (1)
- And life without parole for homicide defenders; de facto life sentencing. (1)
- Appellate proceedings (1)
- Arkansas; Arkansas Appellate Courts; Rule 37.1; post-conviction appeals; Supreme Court Rule 1-2(H); Barnes v. State (1)
- Arkansas; Arkansas DNA statutory law; death row appeals; DNA proof of innocence; forensic science flaws to secure convictions; Innocence Project; meaning of "finality"; death penalty convictions; (1)
- Ascendancy of Free Exercise Clause over Establishment Clause (1)
- Case citations in federal appellate opinions (1)
- Citation provenance (1)
- Citation stickiness (1)
- Citation-practice studies (1)
- Citations used in judicial decision making (1)
- Composition of Joint Supervisory Body (1)
- Cooper v. Aaron; Little Rock history; segregation; Arkansas history (1)
- Criminal trial techniques; closing arguments; permissible argument; improper closing arguments; out-of-bounds argument; criminal trial closing arguments; personal attacks against opposing counsel; commenting on defendant's exercise of constitutional rights; expressing personal opinions in criminal closing argument; prejudicing the jury; asking jury to send a message to deter future crimes; convincing jurors to render verdict our of fear (1)
- Criteria of assignment to Joint Supervisory Body (1)
- Dahda v. United States (1)
- Endogenous citations (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- Frank F. Drowota III (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (1)
Articles 1 - 25 of 25
Full-Text Articles in Law
Goat Testicles, Scientific Evidence, And Consequences: Stopping A Killing Spree With Nothing But Evidence Law, William Gordon Childs
Goat Testicles, Scientific Evidence, And Consequences: Stopping A Killing Spree With Nothing But Evidence Law, William Gordon Childs
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Continuing Evolution Of Juvenile Sentencing Laws, Misty Wilson Borkowski
Continuing Evolution Of Juvenile Sentencing Laws, Misty Wilson Borkowski
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—A Tale Of Two Shootings: Should A Bivens Remedy Be Available When Cbp Agents Shoot And Kill Victims On The Mexican Side Of The Border?, Glenn Larkin
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Sperminator As A Public Nuisance: Redressing Wrongful Birth And Life Claims In New Ways (A.K.A. New Tricks For Old Torts), Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
The Sperminator As A Public Nuisance: Redressing Wrongful Birth And Life Claims In New Ways (A.K.A. New Tricks For Old Torts), Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can God Create A Rock So Heavy That He Cannot Lift It? Outlawing Pensions Under State Constitutions, Chad J. Pomeroy
Can God Create A Rock So Heavy That He Cannot Lift It? Outlawing Pensions Under State Constitutions, Chad J. Pomeroy
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Power Of A Mentor, Marshall L. Davidson Iii
The Power Of A Mentor, Marshall L. Davidson Iii
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Eurojust Joint Supervisory Body’S Contributions To The Development Of Proceedings Before Eu Boards Of Appeal, Xaviar Tracol
The Eurojust Joint Supervisory Body’S Contributions To The Development Of Proceedings Before Eu Boards Of Appeal, Xaviar Tracol
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Picture, Nancy Bellhouse May
The Picture, Nancy Bellhouse May
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Church/State Puzzle, Kermit V. Lipez
Reflections On The Church/State Puzzle, Kermit V. Lipez
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Citation Stickiness, Kevin Bennardo, Alexa Z. Chew
Citation Stickiness, Kevin Bennardo, Alexa Z. Chew
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This Article is an empirical study of what we call citation stickiness. A citation is sticky if it appears in one of the parties' briefs and then again in the court's opinion. Imagine that the parties use their briefs to toss citations in the court's direction. Some of those citations stick and appear in the opinion—these are the sticky citations. Some of those citations don't stick and go unmentioned by the court—these are the unsticky ones. Finally, some sources were never mentioned by the parties yet appear in the court's opinion. These authorities are endogenous—they spring from the court itself. …
Criminal Law—Rush To Judgment: Arkansas's Troubling Interpretation Of Dna Statutory Law, Michael Pollock
Criminal Law—Rush To Judgment: Arkansas's Troubling Interpretation Of Dna Statutory Law, Michael Pollock
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Jurisdictional Skirmish In The Arkansas Appellate Courts: Rule 37 Post-Conviction Appeals And The Importance Of Supreme Court Rule 1-2(H), J. Thomas Sullivan
A Jurisdictional Skirmish In The Arkansas Appellate Courts: Rule 37 Post-Conviction Appeals And The Importance Of Supreme Court Rule 1-2(H), J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure—Jurisdictional Limitations On Federal Judges' Ability To Authorize Electronic Surveillance: A Cry For Congressional Guidance, Meredith A. Powell
Criminal Procedure—Jurisdictional Limitations On Federal Judges' Ability To Authorize Electronic Surveillance: A Cry For Congressional Guidance, Meredith A. Powell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper V. Aaron And Judicial Supremacy, Christopher W. Schmidt
Cooper V. Aaron And Judicial Supremacy, Christopher W. Schmidt
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crossing The Line: Techniques Of Closing Argument That Are Out Of Bounds In Criminal Trials, Blake R. Mills
Crossing The Line: Techniques Of Closing Argument That Are Out Of Bounds In Criminal Trials, Blake R. Mills
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper V. Aaron And Judicial Supremacy, Christopher W. Schmidt
Cooper V. Aaron And Judicial Supremacy, Christopher W. Schmidt
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Editor's Note—The Ben J. Altheimer Symposium—Cooper V. Aaron: Still Timely At Sixty Years, M. Christine Dillard
Editor's Note—The Ben J. Altheimer Symposium—Cooper V. Aaron: Still Timely At Sixty Years, M. Christine Dillard
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.