Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judicial review (2)
- Citation prohibitions (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Commerce Clause; constitutional law; Violence Against Women's Act; interstate commerce; "substantial effects" test; "rational basis" standard; United States v. Lopez; Gun Free School Zones Act (1)
- Constitution; Congressional Oath of Office; swearing-in ceremony; oath requirements; Ironclad Test Oath; Fourteenth Amendment; Constitutional structure; statutory language; Article V; sacred obligation; (1)
-
- Constitutional law (1)
- Federal criminalization of possession of firearms by felons (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Grandparent visitation statutes; reaffirming parental rights; fundamental rights jurisprudence; (1)
- Inherent powers (1)
- Interstate commerce (1)
- Lower appellate courts (1)
- Right of speech and petition (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- South African law; African National Congress; ANC; apartheid government; Multi-Party Negotiating Process; constitution-drafting; Constitutional Assembly; plain language drafting; Constitutional Principles; (1)
- Unpublished opinions (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Felons, Firearms, And Federalism: Reconsidering Scarborough In Light Of Lopez, Brent E. Newton
Felons, Firearms, And Federalism: Reconsidering Scarborough In Light Of Lopez, Brent E. Newton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The application of the federal prohibition of felons possessing firearms is a stretch of the Commerce Clause. Most cases involve a felon who merely happened to be in possession of a firearm. The only relationship to interstate commerce in these cases is that the firearms found were usually manufactured in another state. The application of this prohibition leaves the future of federalism in question.
Constitutional And Family Law—Grandparent Visitation In The Face Of The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause: Parental Or Grandparental Rights? Troxel V. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000)., Oliver G. Hahn
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
You've Taken An Oath To Support The Constitution, Now What? The Constitutional Requirement For A Congressional Oath Of Office, Vic Snyder
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Revolutions: A New Look At Lower Appellate Review In American Constitutionalism, Robert Justin Lipkin
Constitutional Revolutions: A New Look At Lower Appellate Review In American Constitutionalism, Robert Justin Lipkin
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Judicial review allows the Supreme Court of the United States to perform revolutionary constitutional change. The United States Courts of Appeals could also be a vehicle for revolutionary constitutional adjudication.
Constitutionality Of "No-Citation" Rules, Salem M. Katsh, Alex V. Chachkes
Constitutionality Of "No-Citation" Rules, Salem M. Katsh, Alex V. Chachkes
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No-citation rules raise serious constitutional concerns. Assuming that it is constitutional to designate an opinion as nonprecedential, it is not constitutional to prohibit citing an opinion. No-citation rules are unconstitutional for two reasons. The first, citation prohibitions interfere with a litigant’s First Amendment right of speech and petition. Second, citation prohibitions violate the separation of powers.
Publicity And The Judicial Power, Daniel N. Hoffman
Publicity And The Judicial Power, Daniel N. Hoffman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The judicial branch was created in order to ensure that the rule of law and not the rule of man prevailed. Judges must use reasoning and analysis to fulfill this role. Making decisions based on mere coin tosses or without giving a reason for the decision detracts from the rule of law. Issuing decisions that cannot be published or cited also detracts the judicial role of ensuring that law rules the land.
A Constitutional Beginning: Making South Africa's Final Constitution, Christina Murray
A Constitutional Beginning: Making South Africa's Final Constitution, Christina Murray
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Commerce Clause—Violence Against Women Act's Civil Rights Remedy Exceeds Congress's Powers To Regulate Interstate Commerce. United States V. Morrison, 120 S. Ct. 1740 (2000)., Jennifer L. Wethington
Constitutional Law—Commerce Clause—Violence Against Women Act's Civil Rights Remedy Exceeds Congress's Powers To Regulate Interstate Commerce. United States V. Morrison, 120 S. Ct. 1740 (2000)., Jennifer L. Wethington
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.