Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil forfeiture; illegal drug activity and forfeiture; Title 21 U.S.C. § 881; protections for persons involved in civil forfeiture; Eighth Amendment; (1)
- Commercial speech doctrine; commercial speech test; First Amendment; Central Hudson test; (1)
- Establishment Clause of the First Amendment; parochiaid doctrine; constitutional barrier to certain modes of delivering special education; three-part purpose-effect entanglement analysis; Lemon test; purpose prong; primary effect prong; excessive entanglement prong; statutory sources of government aid to students with disabilities in religious schools; Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act; IDEA; delivery of related services; establishment clause jurisprudence; (1)
- First Amendment; bias crime; anti-bias crime legislation; penalty enhancement laws; criminal law; civil anti-discrimination laws; overbreadth application; use of speech to prove biased motive; (1)
- Free Exercise Clause; First Amendment; facially neutral laws of general applicability; compelling interest test; (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Law—21 U.S.C. § 881 And The Eighth Amendment: Application Of The Proportionality Requirement To Civil Forfeitures. Austin V. United States, 113 S. Ct. 2801 (1993), T. Michelle Ator
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Commercial Speech—Face-To-Face Solicitation By Certified Public Accountants (But Not Attorneys?) Is Protected Speech Under The First Amendment, L. Kyle Heffley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Free Exercise Clause—Sacrificial Rites Become Constitutional Rights On The Alter Of Babalu Aye, Allison J. Cornwell
Constitutional Law—Free Exercise Clause—Sacrificial Rites Become Constitutional Rights On The Alter Of Babalu Aye, Allison J. Cornwell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Anti-Bias Crime Legislation And The First Amendment—Supreme Court Upholds Wisconsin's Penalty Enhancement Law. Wisconsin V. Mitchell, 133 S. Ct. 2194 (1993)., Tamara L. Hamilton
Constitutional Law—Anti-Bias Crime Legislation And The First Amendment—Supreme Court Upholds Wisconsin's Penalty Enhancement Law. Wisconsin V. Mitchell, 133 S. Ct. 2194 (1993)., Tamara L. Hamilton
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Zobrest V. Catalina Foothills School District, 113 S. Ct. 2462 (1993): An Answered Prayer To Students With Disabilities In Religious Schools, Mardi L. Blissard
Constitutional Law—Zobrest V. Catalina Foothills School District, 113 S. Ct. 2462 (1993): An Answered Prayer To Students With Disabilities In Religious Schools, Mardi L. Blissard
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Miranda Comes Out From Under A Stone: In Withrow V. Williams, The Supreme Court Declines To Extend The Rule From Stone V. Powell To Preclude Federal Courts From Hearing A State Prisoner's Habeas Corpus Petition Based On An Alleged Violation Of The Prisoner's Miranda Rights, Marcus N. Bozeman
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.