Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Primary Issues In Compensation Litigation, Commissioner J. Randolph Ward Jan 1995

Primary Issues In Compensation Litigation, Commissioner J. Randolph Ward

Campbell Law Review

This Article seeks to aid the practicing attorney with hearing preparation and research by identifying fundamental issuesthose matters that should be stipulated, or will be litigated, in virtually every workers' compensation case-and the grounds on which they are most commonly controverted. Recent amendments to the operative statutes are noted.


The Fairness Requirement For A Workers' Compensation Agreement - The Effect Of Vernon V. Steven L. Mabe Builders, Isabel E. Loytty Jan 1995

The Fairness Requirement For A Workers' Compensation Agreement - The Effect Of Vernon V. Steven L. Mabe Builders, Isabel E. Loytty

Campbell Law Review

This Note provides a history of North Carolina courts' treatment of voluntary settlement agreements prior to Vernon v. Steven L. Mabe Builders. Next, this Note examines the ruling in Vernon, as well as the court's reasoning. The Note then reviews the relevant provisions of the Workers' Compensation Reform Act of 1994 passed by the General Assembly in July, 1994. Finally, the Note addresses the ramifications of the Vernon decision and concludes with a discussion of the decision's effects and the questions it raises.


The Substantial Certainty Exception To Workers' Compensation, Michael Doran Jan 1995

The Substantial Certainty Exception To Workers' Compensation, Michael Doran

Campbell Law Review

This Article attempts to point toward the correct definition and application of the substantial certainty liability standard, recognizing its foundation in the Woodson and Barrino decisions. This Article also will point out the apparent misapplications of the standard in decisions handed down after Woodson. Finally, in light of the North Carolina Supreme Court's per curiam decision in Owens v. W.K Deal Printing, Inc., which appears to illustrate the court's disapproval of the definition and application of substantial certainty contained in decisions from other courts, this Article will attempt to forecast the direction of future decisions involving this theory of civil …


Mediation Of Industrial Commission Cases, Lex K. Larson Jan 1995

Mediation Of Industrial Commission Cases, Lex K. Larson

Campbell Law Review

This Article describes the North Carolina system of mediating Industrial Commission cases and discusses some of the important issues that are being faced. Where appropriate, North Carolina's system is placed in the context of what other states are doing.


A New Exception To The Exclusivity Provision Of The North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act - Woodson V. Rowland, Debbie Collins Jan 1992

A New Exception To The Exclusivity Provision Of The North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act - Woodson V. Rowland, Debbie Collins

Campbell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Workers' Compensation - Death Knell Of A Good Samaritan! - Culpepper V. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Kathleen G. Sumner Jan 1989

Workers' Compensation - Death Knell Of A Good Samaritan! - Culpepper V. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Kathleen G. Sumner

Campbell Law Review

First, this Note examines the impact of the Culpepper decision on Workers' Compensation claims involving employees rendering assistance to a third party. Second, the Note also serves as a caveat to employers who establish a general employee policy relating to dealing with the public.


Workers' Compensation - A Departure From Precedent Or Past Error Corrected - Rutledge V. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, Sharon L. Hartman Jan 1984

Workers' Compensation - A Departure From Precedent Or Past Error Corrected - Rutledge V. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, Sharon L. Hartman

Campbell Law Review

This note examines Rutledge in view of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act and North Carolina precedent interpreting the Act in the occupational disease area. It focuses on whether the standard adopted by the court is consistent with precedent and the purposes of the Act. Finally, it considers the effect of this standard on the byssinosis victim in proving the necessary causation for a compensable occupational disease.