Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Executive Power (16)
- Signing Statements (15)
- Legislative Power (13)
- Separation of Powers (9)
- Constitutional Interpretation (4)
-
- Freedom of Speech (4)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (4)
- Veto (4)
- Antiterrorism Measures (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Judicial Review (3)
- Judicial Review of Administrative Acts (3)
- Due Process of Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Government Employees (2)
- Item Veto (2)
- Legislative Oversight (2)
- Right of Privacy (2)
- Searches and Seizures (2)
- Self Incrimination (2)
- United States Constitution 5th Amendment (2)
- A.B.A. Code of Judicial Conduct (1)
- Abolition of Slavery (1)
- Acoustical Engineering (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Administrative Procedure (1)
- Allen v. United States (1)
- Anti-Zionism (1)
- Antisemitism (1)
- Bill Drafting (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 41
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sense-Enhanced Searches And The Irrelevance Of The Fourth Amendment, David E. Steinberg
Sense-Enhanced Searches And The Irrelevance Of The Fourth Amendment, David E. Steinberg
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Interpreting The Fourteenth Amendment: Two Don'ts And Three Dos, Garrett Epps
Interpreting The Fourteenth Amendment: Two Don'ts And Three Dos, Garrett Epps
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
A sophisticated reading of the legislative record of the framing of the Fourteenth Amendment can provide courts and scholars with some general interpretive principles to guide their application of the Amendment to current legal problems. The author argues that two common legal conceptions about the Amendment are, in fact, misconceptions. The first is that the Amendment was chiefly concerned with the immediate situation of freed slaves in the former slave states. Instead, he argues, the legislative record suggests that the framers were broadly concerned with the rights not only of freed slaves but also of foreign-born immigrants in the North …
Be They Fish Or Not Fish: The Fishy Registration Of Nonsexual Offenders, Ofer Raban
Be They Fish Or Not Fish: The Fishy Registration Of Nonsexual Offenders, Ofer Raban
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Congress Has The Power To Enforce The Bill Of Rigths Against The Federal Government; Therefore Fisa Is Constitutional And The President's Terrorist Surveillance Program Is Illegal, Wilson R. Huhn
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The principal point of this Article is that Congress has plenary authority to enforce the Bill of Rights against the federal government. Although this precept is a fundamental one, neither the Supreme Court nor legal scholars have articulated this point in clear, simple, and direct terms. The Supreme Court does not have a monopoly on the Bill of Rights. Congress, too, has constitutional authority to interpret our rights and to enforce or enlarge them as against the actions of the federal government. Congress exercised its power to protect the constitutional rights of American citizens when it enacted the Foreign Intelligence …
Family Law Federalism: Divorce And The Constitution, Ann Laquer Estin
Family Law Federalism: Divorce And The Constitution, Ann Laquer Estin
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
American divorce law was transformed by the Supreme Court in a series of decisions beginning with Williams v. North Carolina in 1942. These constitutional full faith and credit cases resolved a long-standing federalism problem by redefining the scope of state power over marital status. With these decisions, the Court shifted from an analysis based on the competing interests of different states to an approach that highlighted the individual interests of the parties involved. This change fundamentally altered state power over the family by extending to individuals greater control of their marital status. In the process, the Court cleared a path …
Congressional Criminality And Balance Of Powers: Are Internal Filter Teams Really What Our Forefathers Envisioned?, Emily E. Eineman
Congressional Criminality And Balance Of Powers: Are Internal Filter Teams Really What Our Forefathers Envisioned?, Emily E. Eineman
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Garcetti V. Ceballos: Stifling The First Amendment In The Public Workplace, Julie A. Wenell
Garcetti V. Ceballos: Stifling The First Amendment In The Public Workplace, Julie A. Wenell
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Signing Statements And Divided Government, Neal Devins
Signing Statements And Divided Government, Neal Devins
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Second Class Citizen Soldiers: A Proposal For Greater First Amendment Protections For America's Military Personnel, Emily Reuter
Second Class Citizen Soldiers: A Proposal For Greater First Amendment Protections For America's Military Personnel, Emily Reuter
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Why The President Must Veto Unconstitutional Bills, Saikrishna B. Prakash
Why The President Must Veto Unconstitutional Bills, Saikrishna B. Prakash
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Unconstitutionality Of "Signing And Not-Enforcing", Michael B. Rappaport
The Unconstitutionality Of "Signing And Not-Enforcing", Michael B. Rappaport
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Presidential Signing Statements Controversy, Ronald A. Cass, Peter L. Strauss
The Presidential Signing Statements Controversy, Ronald A. Cass, Peter L. Strauss
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction: The Last Word? The Constitutional Implications Of Presidential Signing Statements, Charlie Savage
Introduction: The Last Word? The Constitutional Implications Of Presidential Signing Statements, Charlie Savage
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The On/Off Switch, Philip Heymann
The On/Off Switch, Philip Heymann
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Presidential Signing Statements In Perspective, Nelson Lund
Presidential Signing Statements In Perspective, Nelson Lund
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Presidential Signing Statements And The Rule Of Law As An "Unstructured Institution", Peter M. Shane
Presidential Signing Statements And The Rule Of Law As An "Unstructured Institution", Peter M. Shane
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Signing Statements: Constitutional And Practical Limits, Louis Fisher
Signing Statements: Constitutional And Practical Limits, Louis Fisher
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Fee Shifting As A Congressional Response To Adventurous Presidential Signing Statements, Harold J. Krent
Fee Shifting As A Congressional Response To Adventurous Presidential Signing Statements, Harold J. Krent
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The First Word, M. Elizabeth Magill
The First Word, M. Elizabeth Magill
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Presidential Signing Statements And Congressional Oversight, A. Christopher Bryant
Presidential Signing Statements And Congressional Oversight, A. Christopher Bryant
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Litigating Presidential Signing Statements, Michele Estrin Gilman
Litigating Presidential Signing Statements, Michele Estrin Gilman
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Signing Statements As Declaratory Judgments: The President As Judge, Phillip J. Cooper
Signing Statements As Declaratory Judgments: The President As Judge, Phillip J. Cooper
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
A Matter Of Direction: The Reagan Administration, The Signing Statement, And The 1986 Westlaw Decision, Christopher S. Kelley
A Matter Of Direction: The Reagan Administration, The Signing Statement, And The 1986 Westlaw Decision, Christopher S. Kelley
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Signing Statements And Statutory Interpretation In The Bush Administration, Neil Kinkopf
Signing Statements And Statutory Interpretation In The Bush Administration, Neil Kinkopf
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Getting To Plan B: A History Of Contraceptive Rights In The United States And An Argument For A Private Right Of Action Against The Fda, Michele Slachetka
Getting To Plan B: A History Of Contraceptive Rights In The United States And An Argument For A Private Right Of Action Against The Fda, Michele Slachetka
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
If At First You Don't Succeed, Sign An Executive Order: President Bush And The Expansion Of Charitable Choice, Michele Estrin Gilman
If At First You Don't Succeed, Sign An Executive Order: President Bush And The Expansion Of Charitable Choice, Michele Estrin Gilman
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article analyzes whether President Bush's charitable choice executive orders, which permit religious organizations to apply for federal funds to deliver social services, are a permissible exercise of presidential power. Although Congress has enacted charitable choice provisions in some major statutes, including a 1996 welfare reform act, it debated but did not extend charitable choice throughout the entire federal human services bureaucracy, as the President's executive orders do. The core question this Article examines is whether President Bush's charitable choice executive orders constitute permissible gap-filling of ambiguous statutes under the Chevron doctrine or impermissible exercises of executive lawmaking under Youngstown …
A Child's Right: What Should The State Be Required To Provide To Teenagers Aging Out Of Foster Care, Katherine M. Swift
A Child's Right: What Should The State Be Required To Provide To Teenagers Aging Out Of Foster Care, Katherine M. Swift
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Teenagers aging out of foster care face harms that can be traced to their lack of preparation for adulthood. This Article argues that teenagers in foster care have a substantive due process right to services not only while they are in state custody but also after they age out of care. The lower federal courts have interpreted the Supreme Court's decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services to mean that foster children-like prisoners and mentally retarded people held in state custody-have a substantive due process right to personal safety. What the courts have not considered is how …
"Sacrificing The End To The Means": The Constitutionality Of Suspicionless Subway Searches, Katherine Lee Martin
"Sacrificing The End To The Means": The Constitutionality Of Suspicionless Subway Searches, Katherine Lee Martin
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origin Of Gun Control In America, David T. Hardy
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origin Of Gun Control In America, David T. Hardy
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Public Employee Speech Rights Fall Prey To An Emerging Doctrinal Formalism, Charles W. "Rocky" Rhodes
Public Employee Speech Rights Fall Prey To An Emerging Doctrinal Formalism, Charles W. "Rocky" Rhodes
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.