Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
Implied Obviousness: Reevaluating The Jury's Role In Nonobviousness After Kinetic Concepts, Michael A. Silliman
Implied Obviousness: Reevaluating The Jury's Role In Nonobviousness After Kinetic Concepts, Michael A. Silliman
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Nonobviousness is a central patentability requirement, requiring that a person with ordinary skill would not have found the patented subject matter obvious. Due to its flexibility, obviousness is the most commonly litigated requirement. It is thus crucial that the US judicial system determine obviousness uniformly, predictably, and accurately. However, because nonobviousness is a mixed question of law and fact, it is often unclear how much control the judge and jury have over the ultimate conclusion. In Kinetic Concepts v. Smith & Nephew, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit increased the jury's role in the obviousness determination, …