Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Seattle University Law Review

Journal

1997

Medical

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Experimental Medical Treatments: Who Should Decide Coverage?, Jody C. Collins Jan 1997

Experimental Medical Treatments: Who Should Decide Coverage?, Jody C. Collins

Seattle University Law Review

To illustrate the controversy surrounding experimental treatment provisions in general, this Comment examines the case law and resulting legislation pertaining to HDC-ABMT as a treatment for breast cancer. Part I presents background information on autologous bone marrow transplants generally, and how the treatment relates specifically to breast cancer patients. Part II presents a survey of current law regarding coverage of HDC-ABMT for breast cancer. Part III explores the merits and limits of judicial and legislative determinations of whether a particular treatment is covered under an insurance policy. Part III then concludes that while judicial and legislative intervention may be appropriate, …


Who Should Make Medical Decisions For Incompetent Adults? A Critique Of Rcw 7.70.065, Adrienne E. Quinn Jan 1997

Who Should Make Medical Decisions For Incompetent Adults? A Critique Of Rcw 7.70.065, Adrienne E. Quinn

Seattle University Law Review

To show why the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 7.70.065, Washington's medical decision-making statute should be rewritten, this Comment discusses: (1) the importance of autonomy and self-determination in medical decision-making; (2) the purpose of proxy medical decision-making statutes; (3) Washington's proxy *574 decision-making statute; and, (4) current family demographics. This Comment concludes by proposing a new medical decision-making statute for Washington.