Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- ALJs (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative law judges (1)
- Administrative stuctures (1)
- Appellate courts (1)
-
- Appointments clause (1)
- Cognitive psychology (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Deference doctrine (1)
- Due process (1)
- Educational psychology (1)
- Free Enterprise Fund (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Inferior officers (1)
- Interbranch appointment (1)
- Jury instructions (1)
- Morrison (1)
- Plain language (1)
- Removal (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Resolving The Alj Quandary, Kent H. Barnett
Resolving The Alj Quandary, Kent H. Barnett
Scholarly Works
Three competing constitutional and practical concerns surround federal administrative law judges (“ALJs”), who preside over all formal adjudications within the executive branch. First, if ALJs are “inferior Officers” (not mere employees), as five current Supreme Court Justices have suggested, the current method of selecting many ALJs likely violates the Appointments Clause. Second, a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision reserved the question whether the statutory protections that prevent ALJs from being fired at will impermissibly impinge upon the President’s supervisory power under Article II. Third, these same protections from removal may, on the other hand, be too limited to satisfy impartiality …
Through The Eyes Of Jurors: The Use Of Schemas In The Application Of "Plain-Language" Jury Instructions, Sara Gordon
Through The Eyes Of Jurors: The Use Of Schemas In The Application Of "Plain-Language" Jury Instructions, Sara Gordon
Scholarly Works
"Through the Eyes of Jurors" is the first law journal article to consider all of the major cognitive psychology studies that examine how "schemas," or the preexisting notions jurors have about the law, shape jurors' use of jury instructions, even when those jurors are given "plain-language" instructions. This Article examines the social science research on schema theory in order to advance our understanding of how schemas continue to influence jurors' use of jury instructions, even when those jurors are given "plain language" instructions.
A significant body of legal literature has examined jurors' use and understanding of jury instructions, and many …
Dubious Deference: Reassessing Appellate Standards Of Review In Immigration Appeals, Michael Kagan
Dubious Deference: Reassessing Appellate Standards Of Review In Immigration Appeals, Michael Kagan
Scholarly Works
The long-standing doctrine of deferential review by appellate courts of findings of fact by administrative agencies is seriously flawed for two main reasons. First, the most prominent justification for deference relies on the empirical assumption that first-instance adjudicators are best able to determine the truth because they can directly view witness demeanor. Decades of social science research has proven this assumption about the value of demeanor false. Second, in principle, the deference rule applies to all types of administrative adjudication, with no attention to the relative gravity of interests at stake in different types of cases or to the varying …