Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Issue Classing--The Express Checkout Of Class Actions, Shaquille Grant
Issue Classing--The Express Checkout Of Class Actions, Shaquille Grant
SMU Law Review Forum
No abstract provided.
Online Threats: The Dire Need For A Reboot In True Threats Jurisprudence, John Sivils
Online Threats: The Dire Need For A Reboot In True Threats Jurisprudence, John Sivils
SMU Law Review Forum
No abstract provided.
Developing A Law School Course On Presidential Impeachment, Gregory S. Crespi
Developing A Law School Course On Presidential Impeachment, Gregory S. Crespi
SMU Law Review Forum
This short essay discusses my motivation for and the process that I went through over the past two years developing a law school course on Presidential Impeachment and related topics. I recommend that those law school faculty members who may have only a modest constitutional law background, but who feel as I do that more sustained discussion of the questions that would be presented by an attempt to remove President Trump from office through impeachment are called for, consider also developing and offering such a course.
I found that through reading a few accessible books and supervising a handful of …
Should Good People Be Doctors? A Comment On Paul Butler And Anonymous, Richard Delgado
Should Good People Be Doctors? A Comment On Paul Butler And Anonymous, Richard Delgado
SMU Law Review Forum
No abstract provided.
Overwriting And Under-Deciding: Addressing The Roberts Court's Shrinking Docket, Meg Penrose
Overwriting And Under-Deciding: Addressing The Roberts Court's Shrinking Docket, Meg Penrose
SMU Law Review Forum
No abstract provided.
The Rise Of The Viewpoint-Discrimination Principle, Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
The Rise Of The Viewpoint-Discrimination Principle, Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
SMU Law Review Forum
The Supreme Court’s freedom-of-speech jurisprudence is complicated. There are few hard and fast rules. One is that judicially-imposed prior restraints on speech are hardly ever permissible. In recent years, another hard and fast rule appears to have developed. It is that the government may never prohibit speech simply on account of its viewpoint. It remains unclear whether this is a per se prohibition or whether such viewpoint-focused regulation must overcome the all but insurmountable burden of serious strict scrutiny. In any event, any governmental rule that attempts to regulate speech based on its point of view will almost certainly be …